Hijacking Sustainability by Adrian Parr

Parr moves through discussions of trash, disaster relief, slums, and poverty, treating each topic within a social context, emphasizing that a one-size-fits-all approach is ineffectual.

Hijacking Sustainability

Publisher: MIT Press
ISBN: 978-0-262-013
Author: Adrian Parr
Price: $24.95
Length: 224
Formats: hardcover
US publication date: 2009-03

The central idea of Parr’s book Hijacking Sustainability is sound: the concept of sustainability has been co-opted by American companies, governmental bodies, and even Hollywood for the purpose of advancing their respective agendas. The result is antithetical to the whole point of sustainability. Unfortunately, Parr’s method of supporting her arguments is so convoluted and pseudo-academic, it becomes rather inaccessible reading.

Much of the text in the first half of the book, “The Popularization of Sustainability Culture”, reads like the captions on the wall of a gallery showing an eco-art exhibit. Parr mostly aims for scholarly and scientific writing but then veers into a pop culture tone at random intervals. Some sentences are just too long, with difficult logic (plus they’re just not logical at times.) Statistics should support Parr’s assertions, but when they are used at all, they are included in such indiscriminate plenty that the point is lost. For example, an argument that the reinvention of Wal-Mart as an ecobrand is laughable is simple enough to understand, but throwing in a paragraph full of statistics about how many retail feet exist per person in the US versus the UK versus Africa detracts from the central point: “as sustainability culture goes corporate, it is turning into another branding strategy.”

Often wordy to the point of losing the thread of her argument completely, Parr provides plenty of helpful references in the form of endnotes, but the average reader is unlikely to flip back and forth. As Parr then uses author names from the references in her discussion, without providing context for someone who isn’t referring to the back of the book regularly, I found myself confused on a number of occasions about what research Parr was referring to. For someone already familiar with authorship on the subject of sustainability, this might not prove to be an obstacle, but I found it distracting. Footnotes, though they would be plentiful (as is, there are 25 pages of endnotes for 166 pages of text!), would be a better idea for helping the reader to follow along.

Hijacking Sustainability is most interesting when concrete examples are given about what people are doing regarding true sustainability -- like examples of activism including car-shaped tents given to the homeless as both a pseudo-art installation and social experiment. A chapter on sustainability culture within the White House as different presidents have come and gone is a good case study for supporting the book’s overall premise. First Lady Michelle Obama has been in the news lately for her gardening efforts at the White House, but Parr asserts that this is not the first organic garden to be planted at that venerated Pennsylvania Avenue address.

Parr’s discussion of the timeline of greening efforts at the White House as an example set for the US as a whole extends right back to the building of the presidential residence, with natural temperature control mechanisms put in place by original architects. The White House sets an example for others to be inspired by, and it is often the values of the family in residence that affect the green agenda implemented by the staff, Parr points out.

Parr undermines her own credibility when she slips into disrespectful references to world leaders whose attitude toward green initiatives has been less than ideal. Referring to the former president as “President Bush Junior” comes across as condescending, even to this liberal-leaning reader. In addition, the lack of attention to segues makes much of Parr’s material disjointed, as though this book is more of an early draft of her ideas than something intended for mass publication.

In chapter three, provocatively titled “Ecovillages: An Alternative Social Organization”, Parr uses 14 out of the 16 pages in the chapter ranting about the fake nature of artificially constructed suburban communities before coming to the professed point of the chapter. It is almost as a digression that Parr finally starts to discuss the ‘social resiliance’ of ecovillages, where residents tend to barter rather than buy, and every action is undertaken with the good of the community in mind. The inability to consistently focus on the central point of a chapter’s premise significantly detracts from Parr’s intent to educate the reader about sustainability issues.

The second half of the book comes under the heading “Challenges to Sustainability Culture”, and here Parr finally starts to hit her stride. Bringing in concrete examples of e-waste transforming the landscape of third world countries where people who try to harvest reusable and resaleable materials from discarded electronics are exposed to poisonous toxins. Whenever we upgrade to a new efficient and environmentally friendly device, the discarded old device becomes someone else’s problem; the promoter of the new item might have neglected to mention this. The only appropriate reaction is outrage, and Parr finally manages to inspire that emotion in her reader. The writing becomes more readable in the second half of the book, and perhaps starting here would make it easier to stomach the academic tone of the first half of the book.

Parr moves through discussions of trash, disaster relief, slums, and poverty in the second half of Hijacking Sustainability, treating each topic within a social context, emphasizing that a one-size-fits-all approach is ineffectual. She also discusses some aspects of sustainability that are contradictory, for example the reaction of the Indian government following the tsunami of 26 December 2004. The government sought to enforce resettlement zones 200-500 meters back from the shoreline in an effort to protect the fishing communities from likely further coastal erosion and sea level rises. The villagers protested, as a move that far back from the shore would harm their ability to fish as they have for generations. On the one hand, an example of ecologically minded preventative measures, on the other hand the desire to preserve a cultural identity.

Overall, Parr provides some food for thought with regard to the ubiquitousness of so-called ‘green’ measures, which in many cases are being turned into marketing concepts. But would we prefer that the concept of green living remained a marginalized idea?


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.