The Ettes: Danger Is EP

Garage-punks continue build the hype.

The Ettes

Danger Is EP

Label: Take Root
UK Release Date: 2009-03-10
US Release Date: 2009-04-07

Garage pop trio the Ettes ended 2008 on a high note, landing a spot on Allmusic’s “Favorite Garage Rock Albums of ‘08” with their sophomore disc, Look at Life Again Soon, and leave many of the genre’s followers scrambling to find the record and brad to friends that they’d totally been into the Ettes all along (cough, cough). The band -- guitarist/singer Coco, drummer Poni and bassist Jem -- has wasted no time this year building on those gains, enlisting new buddy Dan Auerbach (of the Black Keys) to produce a few tracks for their Danger Is EP, giving new fans a chance to better acquaint themselves with the band’s band of high-octane beat-punk boogie.

The two Auerbach-produced tunes -- “No Home” and “Lo and Behold” -- pick up where last year’s LP left off: the former all lo-fi skronk with Coco’s come-hither vox and bleating guitar riff, the latter track channeling ’50s female rockabilly chained to a great prickly solo, with both songs checking in near the 3-minute mark. Meanwhile, “Subject” (accent on the second syllable) is a swaggering, welcome carryover from Look at Life, and two live tracks, “The Rules” and “I Heard Tell”, from 2004 and 2008, respectively, show how fully formed the band’s sound was five years ago, with only a subtle shift from blooze to punk.

And since the physical EP is going the way of the dodo, the disc includes three value-added music videos of vary quality and interest for tunes off Look at Life: “Crown of Age”, “I Get Mine” and “Marathon”. And yes, they’re all on YouTube and the band's website, so take “value-added” with a grain of salt.

Despite being a little light on new material (hence the only-okay grade), if you missed December ‘08’s proclamation that the Ettes were on the fast track to being the Next Big Thing, consider Danger Is your final warning.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.