24 Tweets

Michael Dare
Image (partial) by Hugh Macleod found on Gaping

Having to bop back & forth between Facebook & MySpace & Plaxo & Blogger & Skype & Twitter is just too fucking much & I’m wading thru all thi[0!]

24. Yeah, I came here to check it out, signed up, sat back, and waited. Within a day I had almost 50 followers even though I hadn't twitted

23. once. Every time I started something it ran too long, as I often do, and being an adherent to the beginning, middle, and ending theory of

22. writing, I found no way of communicating I was happy with. I live with the dreaded red negative number outside the Twitter box. I

21. considered posting cutesy sayings like "The early worm gets eaten by the bird." Aren't you glad I didn't? I'm certainly not going to bother

20. anyone with what I'm actually doing right now. I'm typing, obviously, and anyone who disagrees can meet me outside. But there's a larger

19. issue at stake here as social networks continue to take over our lives. If there were just one place, I could deal with it, but having to bop back

18. and forth between Facebook and MySpace and Plaxo and Blogger and Skype and Twitter is just too fucking much. I'd rather not know

17. anybody than have to face the mountain of blather, and I don't mean you personally. All your postings are succinct and precise. You're a

16. genius. I'm talking about all that other crap out there. What am I doing? Right now? Twitter, do you really want to know? Wading through

15. crap. That's all I do. This is my first and last twit, though it may go on for a while. I say if you want to believe in evolution, just take a look at

14. the human mind today compared to 20 years ago. Today, our PCs are an extension of our brains, which are intricately connected to everyone

13. else's brain. 20 years ago, if you wanted to be published, you had to find an editor at a publishing house or newspaper or magazine to reach

12. an audience. Now all you need is a library card. The death of newspapers has less to do with Craig's List and more to do with the death of the

11. job of editor. In the reader's quest for the uncensored and thoroughly enlightened version of whatever it is we like, we just Google and find it,

10. whatever it is we're looking for, it's there, in abundance. We don't need no stinking editor. Fuck editors, always telling you what they think

9. you should read. We cut out the middleman and mainline the pure stuff. Like a sculptor who dreams of giant bronze statues, writers dream of

8. expanding their horizons, moving from words, lots of words, to actual sentences that say something, upward to paragraphs that expand upon

7. your every thought, adding up to complete pieces with themes that bind it all together, more than words and sentences and paragraphs, a

6. fluidity of thought that leads to the novel, the final experiment for any budding wordsmith. The evolution of the writer is the constant

5. expansion of your ability to string it along in a larger and larger forum where everything has a coherency that fulfills the reader's desire for

4. meaning, which is all we're really looking for. Twitter is the opposite of that. Now that writers are personally involved with their readers,

3. skipping the editor and the publisher, the words flowing directly from one computer to another, the job of middleman has become purely

2. technological. What else is Twitter but a big bad editor telling you how many words you can use, so fuck Twitter too. I only write to size if

1. someone is paying me. It costs to shut me up. Faced with Twitter, Charles Dickens would have a coronary. 140 characters? Bite me.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.