A Decade by Lantern Light: "Green Lantern" vs. "The Office"

In his last review for the U.S. version of The Office, Erik Adams of The A.V. Club explained that the final episode of one of the biggest TV shows of the past decade “…gets sentimental, but it deserves to get sentimental.” But it was also more than that. As was Geoff Johns decade-long run on Green Lantern…

In his last review for the U.S. version of The Office, Erik Adams of The A.V. Club explained that the final episode of one of the biggest TV shows of the past decade “…gets sentimental, but it deserves to get sentimental.” “Finale” was a chance to wrap up the season by tying up loose threads, giving answers to long-lingering questions, and to give the characters a sense of completion while still leaving their respective narratives open for viewers to imagine what happens.

But it was also more than that.

The final episode of The Office had to find meaning beyond being the last episode. It had to be a monument to nine years of dedication from the cast, the crew, the producers, and the viewers. It needed to be something that could convey the level of emotion expected from a phenomenally successful TV show that knew when to throw in the towel.

Sentimentality plays a big part in how we consume media. We have our favorite characters, our favorite fictional locations, our favorite bands, and our favorite episodes/issues/songs. Part of storytelling is being able to relate to the audience, thus, if the audience develops an emotional connection to the story, then the creator has done his or her job.

“This song is ending. But the story never ends.”

Comicbook readers of every age are often sentimental about the books of their childhood. While not an odd phenomenon, it’s a perfect example of how we chose to remember the past. My favorite Green Lantern is Kyle Rayner because when I was nine years old and my favorite color was green, I picked up Emerald Twilight. The little artist in me immediately connected with Kyle and his affinity for doodling, his general aloofness, his sincerity, and his amazingly detailed and creative constructs.  To nine-year-old Jay, Kyle Rayner was the coolest superhero ever. And that’s the way I choose to remember those Bronze Age stories: As fond reminders of the excitement I had for a character to which I could actually relate.  

But it wasn’t all good, of course. Much of the art was typical of the era: overly saturated and air-blown. Kyle’s girlfriend met the same refrigerator-based end as a frighteningly large number of female love interests at the time, and the villains were pale comparisons of their Silver Age counterparts. Similarly, while the Office had it’s fair share of low points, sentimentality compels us to remember the good times, and remember them fondly. I’ll always love “Café Disco”, but I don’t have to re-watch any of season eight.

Green Lantern #20 is Geoff Johns’ final issue of the series and the franchise. Nine years ago, Johns wrote Green Lantern: Rebirth, a six-issue limited series that resurrected Hal Jordan, the most popular Green Lantern ever, brought back the legendary Green Lantern Corps after a nearly 15-year absence, expanded the Green Lantern mythos farther than ever before, launched the franchise into a popularity it had never experienced in the past, and created a whole new paradigm for how the Green Lantern corner of the DCU would work. With over 100 issues under his belt, Johns spent the time in between developing new lore, an ever-growing idea about the power of emotion, and a cohesion in narrative structure that couldn’t be rivaled. Green Lantern #20 is not perfect, but it’s rooted in sentimentality because it deserves to be.

“If you want a happy ending, that depends, of course, on where you stop your story.”

There are three narrative elements that have stayed consistent throughout Johns’ run on Green Lantern, and the first two are the emotional spectrum and the betrayal by the Guardians of the Universe. Subsequently, both elements are a big focus of “Wrath of the First Lantern” as we learn how the Guardians have manipulated emotion since the beginning of the universe, with the revenge of Volthoom, the First Lantern, as the straw that broke the camel’s back. In the past, the Guardians have always found a way out of taking responsibility for their bad decisions. Now, they have nowhere else to run because the one thing they were afraid of has happened: emotion won.

The third and arguably most relevant element of Johns’ tenure is Hal Jordan. Much like Jim Halpert on the Office, Hal is the protagonist. Though it sounds like a no-brainer, the fact is that the Green Lantern franchise is a big one that has to accommodate for a lot of leading names: Guy Gardner, John Stewart, Kyle Rayner, and most recently, Simon Baz. The Office populates each episode with storylines from all the employees, but the true overarching narrative is about Jim, his relationship with Pam Beasley, and his growth over the course of a decade from a simple paper salesman to a family man and executive of a sports marketing firm.

The emotional spectrum and the Guardians of the Universe may have been the backdrop and the catalyst, but Hal Jordan is the focus; his journey of redemption upon being resurrected, his trials against the Sinestro Corps, his victory against Nekron during the Blackest Night, and his final stand against the corruption of the Guardians. Johns sent Hal through the ringer over and over again to prove—perhaps to himself, to the readers, and to the character—that Hal could overcome, no matter the circumstances.

“I left the ending ambiguous, because that’s how life is.”

The joy in reading Green Lantern #20 comes from this sentimental sense of finality. Hal Jordan needed his happy ending, and though it can’t happen right this moment, Johns gives us portents of the future, or at least a future. We get to see our favorite Green Lanterns with gray hair, after they’ve shelved the rings and found peace and happiness in normal life. I'll be honest; I shed a tear or two after seeing Glomulus—constructed out of white light this time—next to Kyle, aiding those in need even into old age. The continuity-obsessed out there will grind their teeth at the prospect of a predetermined future, and the super-critical will cry foul by calling it manipulative, but that’s not really the point. This is the emotional payoff to years of stories dealing with the idea of emotion. If it seems like Johns is trying to make his audience cry, then that’s okay because he deserves it, and so do we.

Green Lantern: Rebirth got me back into comics. It was the series that ushered me into the modern age of comics and showed me that creative minds can do extraordinary things with concepts I thought I’d come to know well. Geoff Johns changed the landscape of the Green Lantern franchise farther than it’s ever been taken and Green Lantern #20 is the explosive, exciting, awe-inspiring, emotional finale to it all.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.