Reviews

The Accidental President: How 413 Lawyers, 9 Supreme Court Justices, and 5,963,110 Floridians (Give

Mark Dionne

The most remarkable portion of The Accidental President concerns the final Supreme Court decision that effectively appointed George W. Bush president. Most of the criticism leveled in the book is fairly light, but at the end Kaplan rips into the Supreme Court decision.


The Accidental President

Publisher: William Morrow & Co.
Length: 323
Subtitle: How 413 Lawyers, 9 Supreme Court Justices, and 5,963,110 Floridians (give or Take a Few) Landed George W. Bush in the White House
Price: $26 (US)
Author: David A. Kaplan
US publication date: 2001-10
Amazon
"The candid citizen must confess that, if the policy of the government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court . . . the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
-- Justice Antonin Scalia, dissenting in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 1992

Once upon a time, the 2000 election debacle was set to be the most analyzed and discussed item of contemporary history since, well, impeachment. The controversy over that stalemated election seemed destined for a long life. Historians and journalists were poised to write books exploring the minutia of election law, illuminating the depths of hypocrisy and finding out who actually won Florida.

A passage at the end of David Kaplan's The Accidental President: How 413 Lawyers, 9 Supreme Court Justices, and 5,963,110 Floridians (Give or Take a Few) Landed George W. Bush in the White House, obviously written before September 11th, recalls this era. "George W. Bush may be forgotten soon enough. His presidency is accidental and the tranquil times don't cry out for great leadership."

Are you like me? Did you just shudder?

At least two Election 2000 books have been well worth reading. I've already recommended Jeffrey Toobin's Too Close to Call (see my complete review here) and I can similarly recommend Kaplan's The Accidental President. Kaplan is a senior writer for Newsweek and the author the The Silicon Boys.

The Accidental President has some annoying Newsweek-y quirks. When Gore considers publishing an op-ed that might offend the Supreme Court, Kaplan writes that Gore decides to go ahead with it by saying "Fuck 'em." At least, I think the Vice President said "Fuck." Kaplan writes it as "-- 'em." I understand Newsweek uses the dashes, but I think book buyers can handle a swear word or two. Kaplan also exhibits some habits of mainstream, middle-of-the-road journalism. He consistently balances his criticisms by noting that either political party can be as hypocritical or noble as the other. "What would each have said if they'd been playing with opposite hands -- Gore in front, Bush demanding a recount? No doubt the same things..." As true as this may be, it de-emphasizes what actually did happen and what was said.

However, The Accidental President is also a strong re-telling of the sprawling legal battle. Kaplan clearly had excellent access to many participants and remains unswayed by some of the myths. Does anybody still believe, as Jim Baker was so fond of saying, that the votes had been "counted and counted again"? You should read this book. Do you think Gore maliciously targeted legal votes of our military and Bush's team rescued them? Do you think Secretary of State Katherine Harris acted impartially and independently of the GOP? You're wrong and you should read this book. And one for the Democrats out there: do you think that if the state-wide recount had gone through with Gore tallying up more votes, then he'd be president? You should read the book.

Kaplan sets up his various scenes and numerous characters with brevity and skill. By dropping a few details of his settings or subjects, Kaplan manages to quickly transport the reader to the many different areas of the conflict. "The courtroom of the U.S. Supreme Court is as glorious a setting as there is in government, a testament to the splendor of marble and congressional appropriations." Kaplan also recreates the time with bits from the media, such as newspaper headlines, news telecasts and jokes from Letterman and Leno. Also, like any good reporter, Kaplan rarely misses a chance to take a dig at TV news .

The most remarkable portion of The Accidental President concerns the final Supreme Court decision that effectively appointed George W. Bush president. Most of the criticism leveled in the book is fairly light, but at the end Kaplan rips into the Supreme Court decision. His forceful indictment turns a fairly breezy history into a scathing critique. Kaplan reveals the decision as patently hypocritical, intellectually unconvincing and legally bankrupt. Kaplan makes use of his law school background to put the decision in context, both within the law and history. These end chapters alone makes The Accidental President worth reading.

Toobin's Too Close to Call similarly eviscerates Bush v. Gore. Toobin is a frequent contributor to The New Yorker and Kaplan writes for Newsweek. That is the best illustration I have of the differences between the two books. Where Toobin has the depth and assuredness and trusts the reader with denser legal issues, Kaplan has the lighter style and the ability to quickly set a scene. Look, there's no reason to pit The Accidental President and Too Close to Call against each other. They both appear to have gotten their facts straight and both present those facts in a coherent fashion. Considerable achievements. Look, if you're going to be some kind of geek and read a book about the 2000 elections, you might as well be a real geek and read two.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image