Aerosmith: Pump

Jason MacNeil



Label: Geffen
US Release Date: 2001-11-20

After having accomplished the goal of getting back on the rock/pop radar with its previous album, Aerosmith decided the Great White North, particularly Vancouver, was the place to set about making an enormous comeback in the United States. The end result is now an integral part of the group's history, a large number of singles and MTV-friendly and unfriendly videos and a superb, thorough album. But despite the obvious songs brought to mind from this record, it's the often-underexposed numbers that set the album on its monumental selling path. From the opening riffs of "Young Lust", the Toxic Twin duo of guitarist Joe Perry and singer Steven Tyler run roughshod over a simple yet infectious guitar riff with Tom Hamilton's ascending and descending bass lines propelling the song like a train about to fall off the tracks. Video of this song coming to fruition has been documented, but years later it still sounds fresh and full of life.

Another hidden treasure is the following track, "F.I.N.E.", with Tyler at his double-meaning best, talking about not making love in 25 weeks and certain body parts that squeak. The number is a bit more polished and touched up in the studio, lacking the overtly raw quality oozing from "Young Lust". It's also one of the more noticeable solid efforts from guitarist Brad Whitford and drummer Joey Kramer. Nothing really needs to be said about "Love in an Elevator", which has become an early crowd sing-a-long in recent concerts. The five-minute song, preceded by another double entendre, is a shining five minutes, particularly the middle bridge, where Perry takes the song by the neck and strangles every note for all its worth. The horn section near the song's conclusion is an oddly nice touch, fitting for the song's "wall of sound" quality.

Aside from the four brief snippets such as "Going Down", "Water Song", "Dulcimer Stomp" and "Hoodoo", the only number sounding as if the group is mailing in the effort is the formulaic "Monkey on My Back". In fact, it would appear that the harmonica and more organic instrumentation on "Don't Get Mad, Get Even" would be a much better fit in this slot, leaving the former song in a later, quasi-filler position. Indulging too much in studio effects and background noises, "Monkey on My Back" seems to lose what minimal energy it has quickly, settling for a basic guitar riff and Tyler's ranting. "Janie's Got a Gun", notable for its message as much as for its music, is another cornerstone here. Tom Hamilton co-wrote the song with Tyler, but again the bridge is Perry's territory. Albeit briefer than his playing in "Love In An Elevator", it shows a bit more dexterity and styling. What is odd is how the song seems much more pop-oriented towards its conclusion.

After a brief deluge and a paltry attempt at trying to create a down-home country or Irish feeling, Tyler returns with his "umm mm mmms" and another hit single, "The Other Side". Relying too much on the horn section and too little on the rhythm section, the group tends to sound out of place here, perhaps a case of being too overproduced and overdubbed. "My Girl" sounds as if it was culled from the conclusion of "Young Lust", with an almost identical opening before moving into a slightly old time rock and roll groove in the vein of the Beatles. A big letdown is not only the one-minute asinine Jim Morrison poetry dabbling of "Hoodoo", but "Voodoo Medicine Man", which sounds too confused and almost a waste of time if not energy. Dabbling into different rock and acoustic arrangements, the song is quite aimless.

Thankfully, the foul sonic taste is lost for the finale of "What It Takes", a nice melding of pop and rock driven by piano and accordion. Although Tyler drops some of the band's song titles (such as "F.I.N.E." and "Heart's Done Time"), the song amply passes all tests for durability and crispness. Although some of the songs within sound a bit dated, perhaps due to their saturation of FM Rock radio, most of the album still sounds extremely new and timeless. Not entirely stellar from top to bottom, but when the group still hits paydirt with some of the album's songs, it can't be all that bad.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.