The Allman Brothers Band: Stand Back -- The Anthology

Peter Su
The Allman Brothers Band

Stand Back -- the Anthology

Label: Hip-O
US Release Date: 2004-06-08
UK Release Date: 2004-06-14

Even if it's to Lynyrd Skynyrd that the Allman Brothers Band will always be measured against, their pioneering Southern rock has always been closer, in substance and even sound, to the Grateful Dead. And as someone who would pick Skynrd as the Southern rock band, I'd also place the Allmans, finally, as a good -- maybe very good -- band below Skynyrd and the Dead, in that order.

Lynyrd Skynyrd, including even their umpteen officially released live versions of "Free Bird", were never a jam band so much as a band that occasionally played that really long song. Sure, "Freebird" had those lengthy solos, but solos in the traditional rock sense were still what they were: the song itself was still a formal composition meant to be played as such, not a springboard for improvisation ad infinitum. One wouldn't have mistaken Lynyrd Skynyrd, after all, for a jazz band.

Between the three bands, the Allmans definitely had the most skilled virtuoso in Duane. But jam bands, unlike guitar solos in a verse-verse-chorus-verse song, are at least as much about chemistry as individual heroics. Moreover, jamming aspires to transcendence in a way that many good compositions don't. Jamming aspires to hold your attention without benefit of lyric or being anchored to a steady beat, instead relying on sheer sonics to so entrance the listener that they won't think about leaving. Though the Allmans are praised for their earthiness (for a jam band!) and even though I appreciate earthiness as an abstract standard over hippie trippiness, even I admit that the Dead are greater than the Allmans exactly because their flights of fancy were more unfettered. When they really took off with a song, Garcia and company wouldn't come down again until they'd taken that song to new, completely unexpected melodic and rhythmic domains. I don't listen to much psychedelia or even much freeform jazz but, when I do, that's what I expect all that jamming and improvising to do.

So why was Lynyrd Skynyrd the Southern rock band? Because, for rough-hewn jamming, I'd take the Dead and, for message, Ronnie Van Zant offered a more complete, aggressive, and controversial vision of the New South than the Allman Brothers. Beyond the sheer pleasure of their music, the Allmans' South was much closer to the near-mythic Americana of the Dead than the recognizably contemporary locale of "Sweet Home Alabama". What is their greatest song, "Ramblin' Man", if not a reiteration of the joys of the open, timelessly American road, one filled with dirt roads, Greyhound buses, and sweet country girls, a reiteration told by Huck Finn a decade older and 130 years later? Which is to say that, when they hit the nail on the head, they were as American as Mark Twain; when they didn't, they could be, well, clichéd.

I also have my doubts as to whether this is the better two disc Allman Brothers Band compilation than The Road Goes on Forever. Sure, thanks to tracks licensed from other labels, you get the Allmans' entire career and 32 as opposed to 30 tracks. But after the 1975 cutoff date for that classic compilation, the Allmans sound became increasingly generic and, though they never had much message, they gradually had even less. If their blues leanings (not to mention actual covers) gave their earlier songs the grit that made "Whipping Post" more than just another do-wrong woman number, they gradually sink into fairly mundane stories of regret and love and hardship, usually filtered through the persona of the world-weary traveler that legions of bluesmen and rockers have been adopting at one time or another for the last several decades. At least, earlier, the Allmans themselves had spiced up that persona with their youthfulness, making explicit the connections that had always existed between youthful assman and weathered bluesman (Check out their take of Sonny Boy Williamson's "One Way Out" and compare Gregg's breathless tension with the original's hurried-but-unworried drawl).

It's been almost 30 years since Road, so one can't exactly call this new compilation profiteering. Casual fans no doubt will appreciate a distillation of more than two decades of merely passable albums. But for quality of music alone, stick with the time-tested compilation instead.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.