...And You Will Know Us by the Trail of Dead: The Century of Self

Aside from a handful of glorious moments, tepid songwriting and a number of recyclables from the already battered hardcore playbook mar this effort, registering a “should have been” in place of a genuine comeback.

...And You Will Know Us by the Trail of Dead

The Century of Self

Label: Justice
US Release Date: 2009-02-17
UK Release Date: 2009-02-23
Japan release date: 2009-02-20

Turned loose from the Interscope fold following the release of 2007’s commercially lukewarm So Divided, …And You Will Know Us by the Trail of Dead is a band now well-versed in the role of casualty. Their most recent outing, The Century of Self, sees the Austin three-piece seeking solace in familiar territory with an album of pummeling grandiosity and cascading dynamics. Aside from a handful of glorious moments, though, tepid songwriting and a number of recyclables from the already battered hardcore playbook mar the effort, registering a “should have been” in place of a genuine comeback.

The new album occasionally resembles the band’s 2002 masterwork Source Tags & Codes for its intertwining of titanic prog gestures within the more rough-hewn fabric of Texan hardcore. But while that album’s arrangements represented triumphant feats of vision, comparable tracks on The Century of Self would seem to signify the work of a far less sophisticated ensemble than that responsible for orchestrating the flawless triad of “Another Morning Stoner”, “How Near How Far” and “Relative Ways”.

Instead, Trail of Dead’s latest jaunt overvalues the band’s onstage prowess. Opener “Giants Causeway” is cartoonishly enormous, and when the bass drum and snare finally kick in with sluggish brutality one minute from the song’s end, the album already seems to have made its most profound statement. “Far Pavilions”, a song abounding with energy, is nonetheless disappointing for its lack of a strong melody. Annoyingly like its second-act compatriot “Ascending”, the song favors the visceral excitement of dueling vocal lines from frontmen Conrad Keely and Jason Reece over the substance of sounder songwriting.

Elsewhere, The Century of Self proves rife with technical trickery way past the sell-by date. “Isis Unveiled” is pure caricature, the cocksure triplets of its opening bassline rumbling into little but the uninspired thudding of roomy toms and a unison vocal interlude. Far too often, Trail of Dead seems to lapse into autopilot, murderously burying the beginning hints of melody with annoyingly overlong cymbal raids or too eagerly cuing the background choir (also cartoonish).

What’s curious, though, is that the album’s best songs are guilty of pretty much every aspect of the album’s greater crime against musicality. “Halcyon Days”, for instance, has all the ingredients of unbearable melodrama, yet somehow transcends this aggravation by harnessing the upward force of hyper-aggressively willing a memorable song into the red zone. Likewise, on “Bells of Creation” and “Fields of Coal”, the band’s lack of self-consciousness unquestionably saves them, reminding the listener to always take their occasionally ludicrous levels of pomposity into stride. After all, that same audacity has been at the heart of almost all of Trail of Dead’s finest moments.

For all its flaws, The Century of Self is not nearly as vainglorious as its title implies. When it comes to art rock, nuance wins over outspokenness eight or nine times out of ten. This album shows no exception. Nevertheless, while there’s a certain temptation to call “Ascending” one of the most insipid songs I’ve heard this year, I’d much rather leave you with this impression of the record: more than anything else, Trail of Dead succeeds here by putting together a collection of songs that accurately reflects the kind of band they have always been. This is still a brash, sweeping, “ring the alarm bell!” brand of music. It’s just not that fun to listen to anymore. (Bonus points, though, for the absurdly detailed, hand-drawn cover art by Keely.)


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.