Are these the best of musical times?

For someone who's running a satellite radio station, Lee Abrams has it so backwards that it's understandable why he can't figure out that merging his XM with Sirius is something that even the Washington establishment frowns upon. In his post at the Huffington blog, he tries to make the case about why right now is the worst time for music. What he actually does, though he doesn't realize it, is make the case that this might be the best time.

To see this, let's look at some of his assumptions. First, he details how you know when the music industry is in a lull.

* "The music media is on autopilot."

Right now, there are more outlets than ever, especially in the online world. Factor in blogs and you've got thoughts and opinions all over the place.

* "Artists have short life spans, and quickly become trivia questions."

That's always been the case for most artists. It's the exceptions that we keep coming back to and talking about. Also, he better get used to it because this is going to be the trend from now on. And besides, don't we all love one-hit-wonders now and then?

* "There's an underground happening, but it is still out of reach to the masses."

This guy's never heard of MySpace or Sonicbids or any ol' artist site where they can post music files? It's all easily available to anyone online. Even better, there's never been easier ways for artists to get the word out about their work.

* "The mainstream music culture features harmless lyrics by harmless artists."

Again, this kind of thing always happens and it always will. Yawn...

And now his list of ways that you know that the industry ain't in a lull...

* "Music media goes through explosive evolution."

If that ain't now, it ain't never! The industry's gonna wait a long time before it gets shaken up like this. The big difference is that it's the technology doing it.

* "Artists are in control."

Boy howdy, ain't that the truth? Back to MySpace again, that's part of how artists can reach the masses or at least a decent fan base to sustain them.

* "Music impacts culture profoundly. There are fights over music."

There are plenty of fights and wars playing out right now and it's about music. Specifically, the major labels are trying and failing to reign in music so it's available only in stingy ways that make it less portable. Slowly, they're realizing that DRM ain't gonna work so they'll have to find other ways to play nice with consumers.

* "Listening technology changes."

Yep, that's what's goin' on. Along with our portable MP3 players, we're listening on our phones and taking music where ever we want.

* "The "look" is new: Different and scary."

He's talking about clothing no doubt but there is changing look going on- it's how the technology looks that's different and it's sure as hell scary to the gate keepers who want utter control over how music is bought and listened to.

So that means we're living in a golden age of music, right? It's still unclear how a lot of this is going to play out and the dust isn't going to settle for real because just as solutions come up, new technology is going to keep changing everything.

As for the quality of music, which is Abrams' bottom line in his essay, that's a matter of opinion. We all see and hear music in our teens and tweens as our faves and the soundtrack of our lives and the way we judge everything before or after that. Anyone who grew up on 60s, 70s, 80s or even 90s music is probably disenchanted and threatened by a lot of the new music they hear now and that's expected- one day, your kids'll be disgusted at what THEIR kids are listening to and on it goes.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.