Reviews

Asylum (2005)

Cynthia Fuchs

Surrounded by this sort of oppressive hushing, Stella's largely nonverbal relationship with Edgar resembles a form of attention.


Asylum

Director: David Mackenzie
Cast: Natasha Richardson, Ian McKellen, Marton Csokas, Hugh Bonneville, Gus Lewis, Joss Ackland
MPAA rating: R
Studio: Paramount Classics
First date: 2005
US DVD Release Date: 2006-01-17
Amazon affiliate

Asylum is David Mackenzie's second film about married lady distress. The first, Young Adam, encrypted its interest in the miserable wife in a focus on and narration by her psychopathic lover. This time, while she again has a psychopathic lover, she is also the film's seeming center, unraveling before your eyes.

Asylum -- new to an extrasless DVD from Paramount -- begins sometime in the bland-seeming 1950s. Stella (Natasha Richardson) and her stuffily ambitious psychiatrist husband Max (Hugh Bonneville) are moving into a new home, first espied as they walk slowly through rooms without speaking to each other. The furniture is covered with protective (but also funereal) sheets, the floors are newly shined, the champagne in the fridge serves as modest welcome. Max is the new director of Broadmoor Asylum, a high-security psychiatric hospital. The couple leaves their 10-year-old son Charlie (Gus Lewis) inside as they wander, separately, over to a derelict greenhouse, where shards of glass litter the ground. "We should have this repaired," notes Max. "Goodnight."

With that abrupt introduction to the clamminess Stella is feeling, the film shows the next few days reveal the extent of Stella's frustration. At an airless garden party (no liquor, lots of cigarettes), she can hardly hide her boredom, eluding Broadmoor's very proper director, Jack (Joss Acklund), and turning her attention to the arrogantly disaffected Dr. Cleve (Ian McKellen). Restricted from looking into the asylum cells, instructed to attend meetings with other staff wives, Stella sighs and fiddles with her fingers. "How did my predecessor fill her days?" she asks the maid one morning. "She sewed tapestry," comes the answer. Stella finds another way.

His unsubtle name is Edgar Stark (Marton Csokas). A sculptor incarcerated for killing his wife in a jealous rage, he's now acting as something of a maintenance man (assigned to fix the greenhouse), and technically the charge of Dr. Cleve (whose talent for "arranging things" proves particularly despicable by film's end). After they exchange a couple of meaningful glances and Edgar saves Charlie after he's fallen from a tree, Stella starts making some very strange and overtly bad decisions (though it's never explained, her decision to marry Max seems a precursor to these), so fast and un-desperate that her crisp shift-dresses are barely wrinkled as she hikes them up, her red lipstick hardly smeared. Offered up in an affected, montagey sequence, their early trysts don't suggest passion so much as a series of poses.

The affair leads to disaster -- actually, a series of disasters -- not least because Stella punishes Max for his emotional abandonment, though her social circle only means to punish her -- for being a woman, and worse, for being an unhappy one. Max chides her for wearing a sexy black sheath to a holiday dance, he spends all his time working, not even seeming to notice that she spends large snatches of hers in the arms of another man, though his coworkers certainly do. Asylum hints that Max's emotional clumsiness stems from an overbearing mother (Judy Parfitt), who comes for a visit and immediately voices what everyone else is tippy-toeing around. "Is Stella behaving herself?" she asks. Max responds with the sort of sigh that means she's hit a nerve he can't possibly admit: "Yes, mother."

Surrounded by this sort of oppressive hushing, Stella's largely nonverbal relationship with Edgar resembles a form of attention. But by the time he escapes and she runs off with him to the London, leaving behind Charlie as well as Max, the movie has quite lost sight of what's moving her. (Cleve, concerned with his missing patient, accuses Max indirectly: "Your wife destabilized him"). And much like the women in Young Adam, Stella is punished horribly for her insatiable desire, though that desire is vaguely understandable because Max is so difficult, though in the long run, not nearly so difficult as the increasingly violent, possessive, and off-his-meds Edgar or the increasingly meddlesome Cleve.

Though Cleve remains at the margins of the affair at Broadmoor, lasciviously observing and snidely remarking on Stella's suspected activities, he comes forward once the institution, in league with the police, embarks on a search for the escapee (Cleve's patient). But even as he proposes the doctors and administrators must repair their damaged reps, he has his own agenda. In part he wants to regain control of Edgar, whose condemnation of the doctor as an "old queen" hints at Cleve's particular interest in him. This motive seems complicated, first by Cleve's professed interest in Stella, apparently ever in need of a man to look after her, and then again by his utter absorption by the sculptor's latest work, a teeny little bust of Stella Cleve finds and hides away, so that he can contemplate it in private. It is a mightily creepy little prop, and Cleve's use of it is left to your imagination.

As Stella recedes before this deluge of objectification -- by Max, Edgar, Cleve -- Richardson digs into Stella's many moods and miscues with something like relish (though her descent into depression, physical abuse, and seeming starvation is marked primarily by dark circles under her eyes and frizzy hair). No matter Max's sense of wounding and resentment, Stella is the film's primary victim -- again and again, she's punished. And while you're distanced from her repeatedly, by the end of Asylum, you feel battered as well.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image