Reviews

Babylon A.D.

The fact that Aurora incarnates some extreme other possibility -- be it "light" or darkness, miraculous birth or genocide -- makes her one more "mother of the future."


Babylon A.D.

Director: Mathieu Kassovitz
Cast: Vin Diesel, Michelle Yeoh, Mélanie Theirry, Gérard Depardieu, Charlotte Rampling, Lambert Wilson
MPAA rating: PG-13
Studio: Fox
First date: 2008
UK Release Date: 2008-08-29 (General release)
US Release Date: 2008-08-29 (General release)
Website
I learned something that day. Too bad it was the day I died.

-- Toorop (Vin Diesel)

"Save the planet," says Toorop (Vin Diesel). "Whenever I read that bumper sticker I had to laugh." This because, Babylon A.D. soon reveals, the planet is pretty much unsalvageable. Though it's hard to tell when the film is set, it posits a dystopia sometime after 2017, in which mercenaries like Toorop measure their moral worth against terrorists, whom they consider unprincipled, if well financed, scum.

Such self-serving measurements are conducted against a backdrop of extreme class disparity. While regular citizens live in squalor, power-holders -- say, the Russian gangster Gorsky (Gérard Depardieu), or the High Priestess (Charlotte Rampling) -- appear to be doing okay, with efficient transportation, hefty security guards and state-of-the-art weapons, not to mention lots of money. As expected, their depravity and avarice are highly visible: Depardieu's nose is even larger and more misshapen than usual, the with an even larger, more misshapen nose than usual, the High Priestess is introduced getting a less egregious version of the beauty treatment endured by Katherine Helmond in Brazil.

Toorop, by contrast, is all business, first appearing as he resists pickup by a less philosophically fit fellow fighter ("I thought you were in Sudan killing babies!") by blowing his head off. Since Gorsky has sent this inevitably dead man, Toorop knows money's involved, and so he follows up. The mission -- transporting beautiful virgin Aurora (Mélanie Theirry) from a Mongolian monastery through Eastern Europe to NYC -- pays well and includes a new identity (a fake "passport" injected into the neck) for Toorop, so he can return to the States and retire. Gorsky makes the usual threats ("Cross me and you'll have no place to hide anymore"), as does Toorop ("Goes both ways"), but they strike the deal and soon Toorop's road trip is underway.

The general incoherence of this journey reflects and reinforces that of the film, which has been essentially disowned by director Mathieu Kassovitz as "pure violence and stupidity." While the basic Children of Men-ish thematics (people smuggling, the end of nations, the intersections of religion, biological warfare, and environmental devastation) might have been intriguing in the project's early stages, such complexities have long since been reduced to PG-13 car chases, shoot-outs, and generally unconvincing special effects.

Unfortunately this is the second such descent into American summertime pap for Diesel's costar, Michelle Yeoh (see: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor). As Sister Rebeka, Aurora's guardian, she predictably eschews one of Toorop's guns ("I can defend myself") until she doesn't, at which point she proves to be an expert shot as well as martial artist. Her skills are mostly beside the point -- not that this is precisely clear -- as Toorop perceives and treats her as he treats everyone else, with disrespect and distrust ("Don't fuck with me," he says on meeting her in the snow outside the monastery, "or I'll leave you in the middle of nowhere with nothing but your ass to sell to get back here to your perfect world").

He regards the pale-complexioned girl with similar conduct, though you know she's special because she makes her entrance accompanied by a heavenly female chorus and soft-filtered light. "Are you a killer, Mr. Toorop?", she asks her designated escort. He squints and cocks his head and grinds into dismissive mode: "I'm just the delivery boy, you're just a package." Sister Rebeka strikes a pose, instructing her charge not to talk to this cretin, but the relationship -- chaste thought vaguely lustful -- is already in motion. (And surely, it is only exacerbated when she spots what he's got in his trunk: loads of weapons and ammo, because, he smiles charmingly, "You can never have enough firepower.")

The episodic structure of their travel doesn't build that relationship so much as it ordains it. Toorop learns that Aurora is the child of two competing ideas, embodied by that dogmatic High Priestess and by a brilliant cyborg-making scientist, Darquandier (Lambert Wilson). Both sides send thugs to retrieve the girl, who not only spoke 19 languages at age two and has ooky premonitions like Agatha in Minority Report, but is also "carrying" a precious cargo; Toorop suspects it's a biological weapon, though it might also be a virginal surprise.

The film, based on Maurice G. Dantec's lengthy sci-fi novel, Babylon Babies, does include a brief mention of the changes in conception and identification that afflict this jumbled world. Since animal species have become extinct, Toorop notes, they have been replaced by "second generation clones, copies of copies." How this is bad or what the technologies involve is not explained, but the fact that Aurora incarnates some extreme other possibility -- be it "light" or darkness, miraculous birth or genocide -- makes her one more "mother of the future" as men tend to imagine such creatures. This is tedious, certainly, and underscores the movie's moldiness along with its messiness. But when the final scene reveals a twist, that Aurora is replaced in this capacity by Vin Diesel (who utters a caution lifted directly from the end of The Terminator), it's hard not to feel afraid.

2

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image