A Band of Bees: Free the Bees

Zeth Lundy

Stylistic U-turn from eclectic Isle of Wighters gives revivalism a good name.

A Band of Bees

Free the Bees

Label: Astralwerks
US Release Date: 2005-06-28
UK Release Date: 2004-06-28
Amazon affiliate

When the Bees' co-founder Paul Butler announces "these are the ghosts" in Free the Bees' lead-off track, it's not insincere showboating. The record's dozen songs are ghosts, aural apparitions of '60s rock, soul, and funk that resonate like a séance on tape. The album's very sound is worn and disheveled as if it has weathered decades just to arrive here in 2005 to masquerade as a new recording. And while this kind of functional homage, this reacquisition of a bygone era, is nothing new in the slow adolescence of rock 'n' roll, no album in recent memory has summoned the crackling, compressed char of aged analog with such eerie precision.

Free the Bees is a 180 degree artistic swivel, a complete sonic makeover that bears almost zero resemblance to the band's 2002 debut Sunshine Hit Me. The Bees (who are legally obligated to go by the name A Band of Bees in the U.S.) may have freed asses with the infectious percussion-prodded grooves of their first record, but now they're spastically liberating appendages and minds. The Mercury Prize-nominated Sunshine Hit Me was recorded almost entirely by Butler and Aaron Fletcher in the duo's Isle of Wight shed-cum-studio; Free the Bees, on the other hand, adds four additional musicians to the official line-up and takes them to London's Abbey Road Studios. Gone are the stoned, head-nodding flirts with reggae, dub, and funk. Free the Bees abandons its predecessor's pristine sound for loud, ragged psych-pop with nothing but cage-free horizons in its eyes.

The band places heavier emphasis on songwriting form the second time around, contrary to Sunshine Hit Me's mellowed-out, textured aesthetic function. The shift in focus offers ample room for wide-reaching stylistic allusions. Album-opener "These Are the Ghosts" simultaneously lends the record its ramshackle embrace of all possibilities and blows away previously formulated perceptions of the band's identity. The song tangles itself up in a raucous tizzy of '60s-via-'00s revivalism, drums flailing, vocals urgent and seemingly out of character (and one of the record's engineers contributing a crucial "whoop!" to the convulsive jam). "Wash in the Rain" is an amalgam of the Spencer Davis Group and the Small Faces, its burly Hammond organ and electric guitar clenching up in each chorus' chunky climax. "Horsemen" pursues a groove of a different kind, the thick, backhanded guitar chords trading the Kinks pounce of the verse for the cathedral harmonies of the Zombies in the chorus. And the sax-led circus oscillation of "Go Karts" (the album's one song sung by Fletcher) dizzily brims with contented repetition, suggesting the whirl of Odessey and Oracle adorned with Stax horn charts.

Not satisfied to romp around in one musical playpen, the Bees wander outside the realm of '60s British rock to explore other touchstones of the era. "Chicken Payback" is a sweat-breaking soul workout, a perpetually twisting party song like the Bar-Kays' "Soul Finger" complete with nonsensical lyrics and farm animal noises that recall some of the playful moments on The Beatles. "The Russian", the record's sole instrumental and closest it gets to sounding like Sunshine Hit Me, is a bubbly stew of Hammond and Rhodes, muffled guitars, and horns gyrating on a funky drum beat -- think the Meters donning paisley sunglasses after ingesting spiked punch. They even try their hand at classic soul with the mid-tempo "I Love You", saturating the horns in reverb, setting the Hammond on "simmer", and nailing dainty, Delfonics-inspired background harmonies.

It really is quite difficult to believe that the band behind Free the Bees is the same one responsible for Sunshine Hit Me; while one record isn't necessarily stronger than the other and both are equally eclectic, they seem to be jumpstarted by wildly dissimilar muses. Even more impressive is the Bees' capacity to not only seize upon vintage sounds, but to present them as sounds rediscovered and reconstituted. "Bury the memory / We don't want to go back," the Bees insist, yet must be aware that words are in vain, that they have gone back, that they've brought the irrepressible memories forward to the nooks of the cranium, and, if not made them new again, let them roam free in the expanses of a modern consciousness.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.