Walter Beasley: For Her

Will Layman

Can 'smooth jazz' be particularly bland and mushy? Yes -- yes it can.

Walter Beasley

For Her

Label: Heads Up
US Release Date: 2005-05-24
UK Release Date: 2005-06-27
Amazon affiliate

I had laid out a lovely meal for my family -- a bed of rice, some teriyaki chicken, a medley of sautéed vegetables, and cold beverages -- and I decided to spin For Her, the latest release from "contemporary jazz" saxophonist and singer Walter Beasley.

My daughter, a 14-year-old with a keen eye for insincerity, said, "You're reviewing this, right? Because no way you bought this." She chewed her food meditatively and listened to the title track. "OK, so", she said, "why are those people singing like background vocalists except there's no lead vocal on the song? What are they doing?"

I tried to explain to her that in this kind of music, this "smooth jazz", sometimes the saxophone was the lead "singer". I pointed out that this music wasn't really "jazz" but a kind of instrumental R&B that might sound more like a Marvin Gaye album than a John Coltrane album.

Then my son, who was just about to celebrate his 11th birthday, asked, "Why do the drums sound fake? Are the other instruments fake too?" No, I explained. All the instruments weren't "fake", but the drum parts on records like this were often created through programming. It allowed the producer to get exactly the sound he wanted -- something with an icy, syncopated groove. Tracks 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 11, I explained, had been written by a "producer" who was also the keyboard player and the guy who "programmed" the fake drums. This guy controlled the whole song, then let Mr. Beasley play the melody on his alto or soprano sax. This was how it was supposed to sound. "Well", my son said, "it sounds fake."

"I think a lot of people will like this music," my wife said. "The guy can certainly play the saxophone. And it's not, you know, too jazzy." She smiled at me, which meant something else entirely. "It's not like that other music you usually listen too," she said, "with the squeaking and the squawking all over the place. You can actually eat while this music is on."

Then the singing started in earnest. "Don't Say Goodnight" is a feature for Mr. Beasley's singing. And there is nothing particularly wrong with his pipes, though I don't think they'd get him into the finals of American Idol. But listen to these lyrics for the first verse: "I sit here waiting / My heart anticipating / For you to call me on the phone / And I know it's early / Not quite 7:30 / And soon you'll be coming home / Tonight is special / I planned this sweet event / We'll have dinner by candlelight / I took my time / Chose the perfect wine / To make this evening of ours so right." The rhyming of "waiting" and "anticipating" may be excused, but the overall rap is one shade short of The Onion's comic seducer, "Smoove B".

"OK," my wife said. "I'm sure there's something here you can like." She's right, kind of. The track "Let's Ride" has an actual drummer, one David Cole, who I dig. Funky and human, he locks into a bass line groove doubled by Mr. Beasley's alto and thus lifts the whole song onto the back of his simple, subtly varied beat. This tune actually sounds like it's being played by band rather than programmed on a Korg, like maybe there was a chart and a rehearsal and some exchange of energy between the players somewhere along the way.

Honestly, our dinner conversation -- the clanks of forks against the plates, the call and response of the conversation, the heat arising from some disagreement and the sync derived from some consonance -- is more the stuff of jazz than For Her.

"Maybe it's not supposed to be jazz," my daughter astutely notes. "Like you said, Dad, this is really an R&B album featuring a sax player. Maybe you're judging it by the wrong criteria."

Smart kid. Good point. But if this is an R&B album, I thought, then I have to compare it to the latest Faith Evans album or maybe Justin Timberlake, the Black-Eyed Peas or even the new Al Green. Does it contain one-tenth the juice of those discs? Or is it just a slew of anonymously synthesized beats with a pleasant but bland saxophonist blowing over them, never daring to hit an interesting or surprising note, absent the human cry of someone like, say, Maceo Parker?

My wife offered ice cream for dessert. I walked over to the CD player and slipped on some James Brown. Spoons happily clinked against bowls.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.