The Most Enjoyable Films of 2001

Sara Tucker

The Most Enjoyable Films of 2001

The year was certainly a good one for movies, with a lot of diversity, a lot of fun, and a lot of whimsy. Some set out to make one think or reevaluate previous judgments, while others were strictly for our entertainment. So, in no particular order the films that I enjoyed the most this year were:

Legally Blonde (Robert Luketic)
Reminiscent of Clueless, the most delightful, think-pink movie of the '90s, Legally Blonde questions gender roles, cleverly. At first, it seems that Elle Woods' (Reese Witherspoon) raison d'être is her Harvard-bound boyfriend. Soon it becomes abundantly clear that she needs to depend on no one but herself to succeed. In its fluffy way, Legally Blonde makes it feminist-lite message that boys are fun, but girls can also rock on their own.

Moulin Rouge (Baz Luhrmann)
The story is simple -- two people who are completely different fall for one another nonetheless. However, the costumes are breathtaking, the colors lush, and the set design elaborate. It certainly made me fall in love with the Montmarte and Paris that Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec inhabited.

Memento (Christopher Nolan)
How do our perceptions shape our memories? Christopher Nolan's movie, told in reverse order, endeavors to answer that question. We find out information the same way and at the same time that Leonard (Guy Pearce) does, so we too are in constant doubt. In the end, we must still wonder about what we've just watched, trying to figure out how certain characters fit into the plot as a whole or if there is supposed to be a fit at all.

Bridget Jones's Diary (Sharon Maguire)
So, is everyone over the fact that Renee Zellweger gained some weight to play Bridget Jones? Let's hope so. Based upon Helen Fielding's 1997 novel, Bridget Jones's Diary, the casting choice was controversial (could the Texas-born Zellweger play the so British Bridget?). But Zellweger gave her all, allowing us to empathize and laugh along with (and sometimes at) Bridget.

Ocean's Eleven (Steven Soderbergh)
As Out of Sight attests, Soderbergh knows how to make a heist movie. In Ocean's Eleven, the boys try to take down a Vegas billionaire. The chemistry between these eleven thieves, especially the buddy chemistry between George Clooney and Brad Pitt, draws one in and makes this a fun and entertaining movie.

The Tailor of Panama (John Boorman)
What a fine, sly and leisurely spy movie this is. Pierce Brosnan brilliantly plays an anti-James Bond who, upon his banishment to tropical Panama, decides to have a little fun with some of the locals, most of all, tailor Geoffrey Rush. Against a backdrop of sex, booze, and tropical climate, Brosnan certainly seems to be having more fun playing this roguish spy than the debonair, flawless James Bond.

Shrek (Andrew Adamson, Vicky Jenson)
Shrek overturns the fairy tale notions with which we all grew up: the beautiful princess waits patiently for her Prince Charming or knight in shining armor to ride up on his white horse and save her from her banal existence, basically, everything that Disney fairy tales shoved at little girls (and boys) for decades. Shrek pokes fun at these antiquated notions and asks its audience to laugh at the silly idea that only the beautiful can find love.

Amélie (Jean-Pierre Jeunet)
Amélie is fun and thoughtful and at times fanciful. It's about a woman who, because of her lonely childhood, decides to inject some form of happiness into the lives of the people she knows (all without them knowing that she's behind the interferences). Amélie is so quirky and whimsical that it's hard not to walk away from it with a smile on your face.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.