Games

Better Graphics Don't Make for Better Racing

The 2015 installment of Need for Speed prioritizes realism and verisimilitude over gameplay.


Need For Speed

Developer: Ghost Games

Driveclub, a Playstation exclusive racing game, is a gorgeous looking game. I only played the free version available to PSN subscribers, which locks out a lot of content, but the one track that is available was more than enough to secure it the tentative title of "Best Looking Racing Game That I've Ever Seen." But after completing that track, one whole race, I turned the game off with no desire to play it again. This decision was based on a tunnel featured on that track and the game's insistence on creating a realistic world, complete with realistic eye adaptation effects (that is, the ability of the eye to adjust to various levels of darkness and light).

As I came to the tunnel, I couldn't see past its threshold. It was all darkness. The game was modeling a realistic perception of light: My virtual eye was overwhelmed by the amount of light outside. It couldn't adjust to the dark, so I couldn't see even a few feet inside the tunnel. This was frustrating because the road curved immediately after the entrance. I obviously couldn't see the curve and crashed into a wall. A similar thing happened when I tried again and exited the tunnel. The sudden influx of light blinded me, turning the screen white. I slammed on the brakes expecting to crash again, but when my virtual eye adjusted, I saw only clear, straight road ahead.

Driveclub is a realistic looking game and part of how it achieves that realism is by making the camera mimic the quirks of the human eye. That's all well and good for a racing sim, those kinds of visual obstacles are important to that experience because the experience is meant to reflect reality. However, not every racing game needs to be this realistic and especially not games like Need for Speed, games that put their emphasis on speed. For the arcade racer, these kinds of realistic visual tricks just impede the experience by blocking my vision and forcing me to slow down.

The great danger here is that as consoles and hardware improve and more developers/publishers chase realism as a means of keeping up with their peers, then all racing games risk converging into a single style that’s unsuited to certain kinds of play.

I bring this up because this year's installment of Need for Speed prioritizes realism and verisimilitude over gameplay. It's a simple arcade racer at heart, but that arcade heart is constantly at odds with the game's presentation of itself.

The most obvious example of this is the fact that the entire game takes place at night and in the rain. As you complete missions and progress the story, it's clear that a significant amount of time passes, but the sun never rises in Ventura Bay and it's always drizzling there. It's like Gotham City but devoid of people, criminals and civilians alike, a city populated with cars only. In fact, this is probably what Gotham would look like in Pixar's Cars universe.

Teasing aside, the night and wetness help show off some of the prettier graphical effects. Streetlamps and headlights can only reflect off rainy pavement in the dark, and the diffusion of flashing police lights is only noticeable due to the dark, wet air. It all looks great, but it results in a visually monotonous game and a more difficult game. Night driving is hard. Other games separate night and day driving because they're very different experiences. Need for Speed can offer only one experience because it prioritizes its aesthetics over variety.

The graphics problem hit me when I went back and started playing Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit, a 5 year old game (I wanted to mimic its handling physics in the 2015 game, but ended up just playing it instead). Hot Pursuit still looks pretty damn good. The cars are still detailed and don't look like a collection of jagged pixels, like some Playstation/Playstation 2 games do. What it lacks, however, is periphery content, a world outside the race track. There's just less stuff on the side of the road, featuring instead mostly just hills, forests, deserts, and ocean coasts. It's a scenic world, but also an emptier one, populated with fewer buildings, streetlamps, signs, etc. This is actually nice because I'm free to focus on the road -- and the road only.

The 2015 game is far denser, and while all that stuff may be on the periphery, it's all still competing for my attention. The big neon sign of a diner calls out to me regardless of how fast I'm speeding down a street. Every additional item on the sidewalk -- a sign, a dumpster, a parked car, scaffolding -- it all competes for my attention. Even if it's easy to ignore for the most part, it's annoying to race in a world that's constantly trying to steal my focus away from what matters most.

This issue of realism also effects how race courses are constructed and presented. Hot Pursuit features much more of an open world to exist within, not in the sense that I can dive anywhere, but that it's literally more spacious. The roads feel wider, curves feel longer, and intersections are bigger. Everything is stretched out to make the road ahead easier to see. The developers want to ensure that I know where I'm going. The race isn't meant to be a maze, staying on course isn't part of the challenge, and getting through it as fast as possible is the only challenge. To that same end, Hot Pursuit is happy to break the verisimilitude of its world by blocking off certain pathways. If I come to an intersection and the race track goes left, then the other directions are literally blocked off with giant yellow arrows pointing me in the correct direction. The game wants to make sure that I know where I'm going, and it prioritizes that information over the reality of its world.

In contrast, the world of Need for Speed feels far smaller. Not in terms of overall size, but the roads and turns feel tighter, more confined. This is a more realistically proportioned world, but it’s also not as fun to drive through because there are fewer places where I can just gun the engine and drive like a monster. I can't get up to 200mph on a city street.

The game also keeps its open world open when I'm racing, it makes no attempt to block me from going down the wrong path. A blue marker does appear on the road ahead of me to mark my course, like a holographic GPS device, but that line has an odd tendency to swerve left and right on straight roads, not to mention that it's rather difficult to see in the night-world of Ventura Bay. It becomes especially problematic when you acquire faster cars and the road is coming at you so freaking fast that by the time that the GPS line shows your where to turn, it's already too late. You've driven past it. This splits my attention yet again, forcing me to keep one eye on the minimap that shows my course, turning me into both driver and navigator.

The need for better graphics drives an overall push towards realism, which results in a darker, more confined world with confusing tracks and less effective GPS-like directions. The gamey, unrealistic, and spacious world of Hot Pursuit doesn’t look anywhere near as pretty, but it knows what is important. Every aspect of the world is designed around helping me drive fast. A slightly blurry but player-friendly world is always better than a photorealistic player-unfriendly world. Better graphics aren't going to make a racing game more fun if all that they're used for is making racing harder. Just let me focus on the road.

To be a migrant worker in America is to relearn the basic skills of living. Imagine doing that in your 60s and 70s, when you thought you'd be retired.


Nomadland: Surviving America in the Twenty-First Century

Publisher: W. W. Norton
Author: Jessica Bruder
Publication date: 2017-09
Amazon

There's been much hand-wringing over the state of the American economy in recent years. After the 2008 financial crisis upended middle-class families, we now live with regular media reports of recovery and growth -- as well as rising inequality and decreased social mobility. We ponder what kind of future we're creating for our children, while generally failing to consider who has already fallen between the gaps.

Keep reading... Show less
7

Very few of their peers surpass Eurythmics in terms of artistic vision, musicianship, songwriting, and creative audacity. This is the history of the seminal new wave group

The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame nominating committee's yearly announcement of the latest batch of potential inductees always generates the same reaction: a combination of sputtering outrage by fans of those deserving artists who've been shunned, and jubilation by fans of those who made the cut. The annual debate over the list of nominees is as inevitable as the announcement itself.

Keep reading... Show less

Barry Lyndon suggests that all violence—wars, duels, boxing, and the like—is nothing more than subterfuge for masculine insecurities and romantic adolescent notions, which in many ways come down to one and the same thing.

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) crystalizes a rather nocturnal view of heterosexual, white masculinity that pervades much of Stanley Kubrick's films: after slithering from the primordial slime, we jockey for position in ceaseless turf wars over land, money, and women. Those wielding the largest bone/weapon claim the spoils. Despite our self-delusions about transcending our simian stirrings through our advanced technology and knowledge, we remain mired in our ancestral origins of brute force and domination—brilliantly condensed by Kubrick in one of the most famous cuts in cinematic history: a twirling bone ascends into the air only to cut to a graphic match of a space station. Ancient and modern technology collapse into a common denominator of possession, violence, and war.

Keep reading... Show less
10

This book offers a poignant and jarring reminder not just of the resilience of the human spirit, but also of its ability to seek solace in the materiality of one's present.

Marcelino Truong launched his autobiographical account of growing up in Saigon during the Vietnam War with the acclaimed graphic novel Such a Lovely Little War: Saigon 1961-63, originally published in French in 2012 and in English translation in 2016. That book concluded with his family's permanent relocation to London, England, as the chaos and bloodshed back home intensified.

Now Truong continues the tale with Saigon Calling: London 1963-75 (originally published in French in 2015), which follows the experiences of his family after they seek refuge in Europe. It offers a poignant illustration of what life was like for a family of refugees from the war, and from the perspective of young children (granted, Truong's family were a privileged and upper class set of refugees, well-connected with South Vietnamese and European elites). While relatives and friends struggle to survive amid the bombs and street warfare of Vietnam, the displaced narrator and his siblings find their attention consumed by the latest fashion and music trends in London. The book offers a poignant and jarring reminder not just of the resilience of the human spirit, but also of its ability to seek solace in the materiality of one's present.

Keep reading... Show less
8

Canadian soul singer Elise LeGrow shines on her impressive interpretation of Fontella Bass' classic track "Rescue Me".

Canadian soul singer Elise LeGrow pays tribute to the classic Chicago label Chess Records on her new album Playing Chess, which was produced by Steve Greenberg, Mike Mangini, and the legendary Betty Wright. Unlike many covers records, LeGrow and her team of musicians aimed to make new artistic statements with these songs as they stripped down the arrangements to feature leaner and modern interpretations. The clean and unfussy sound allows LeGrow's superb voice to have more room to roam. Meanwhile, these classic tunes take on new life when shown through LeGrow's lens.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image