Black Furies: Death Trip Saturday Night

Once you're drunk off your ass and the Furies' leather-jacket roadies are packing up the amps, you'll realize that you don't even remember who just played and won't be able to recall a single song.

Eventually you'll run into that one frightening statistic: in any given music year, 90% of the CDs released will not turn a profit. Some might think "Oh, do they mean those groups who have only one Now! That's What I Call Music compilation?" If it were only that easy. Hundreds upon hundreds of new bands pop up each year, but most people will probably hear of only just a few of them. There is good reason why most don't succeed: they just don't do anything. They are either imitating their idols to the point of parody or writing songs so generic that you forget them the moment you heard them. The latter is certainly true for the Black Furies.

This San Francisco rock act isn't a bad band. They aren't lacking six-string proficiency by any means: one would get the impression that this would be a great band to see live while downing beers by the pitcher-full (calling their style "beer-rock" would be surprisingly apt). But once you're drunk off your ass and the Furies' leather-jacket roadies are packing up the amps, you'll realize that you don't even remember who just played and won't be able to recall a single song.

As blunt as it may be, you don't even have to listen to Saturday Night Death Trip to know what it sounds like -- you've heard every single guitar part here before. The songs all just blur together after awhile: it begins with a riff that sounds less catchy than it should be ("Hardwired" is a great example of this) and then shoots off into a generic chorus and will have some guitar soloing popping up at various points (and we "get it" -- you can play a guitar solo -- you don't have to remind us of that on every single track). You might be caught up in the occasional inebriated sing-along, but even then it's hard to keep that up when every song on the album is pleading for your call-and-response to the chorus. It's hard to know what to feel when a chorus consists of the words "Can you feel it?" repeated multiple times in a row. The sheer lack of innovation in the pseudo-title track "Saturday Night Death Trip" should tell you all you need to know: "Death Trip Saturday Night / Money in my pocket and I feel alright / I ain't gonna make it till the morning light / I'm on a Death Trip Saturday Night".

Yet for such a product of overwhelming generalities, one might be compelled to ask where the blame lies. The answer: all over the place. First, it should be noted that the production on this album, in a word, sucks. Two of the strongest elements are hushed down to the point of barely there, much like taming a lion until it behaves like a house cat. Most any rock band wouldn't exist if not for the presence of booming, powerful, commanding drums -- here they're just an afterthought. Same goes for the vocals: there's no ferocity. You can hear the lyrics just get swaggered around in the mouth but never spat out. At times, the Furies' break out into vocal harmonies -- would be nice if we could actually hear them. To top it all off: there are no ballads. This isn't to say that every single rock album ever released is required to include a ballad, but it certainly would be a welcome change of pace given the Furies' tendency to play at full-throttle all the time (hell, even the occasional mid-tempo song would be a nice break).

What's most frustrating about Death Trip Saturday Night is that it's actually tolerable in doses. If you had this on your iPod Shuffle and "Bitter Pill" popped up, it would be a pleasant (though not necessarily great) listening experience. As easy as it is to flat-out pan this band altogether, you get the feeling that they just might be capable of something more. As for when (or even if) we find this out, you can only hope for the best as you stagger to a taxi, worried more about how much your tab is than where you can buy an album by the Black Furies.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.