Music

Black Ox Orkestar: Ver Tanzt?

Justin Cober-Lake

Black Ox Orkestar

Ver Tanzt?

Label: Constellation
US Release Date: 2004-04-26
UK Release Date: Available as import
Amazon
iTunes

Klezmer music has an interesting history running through the 20th Century. It had been a traditional folk music that Jewish travelers took with them through various parts of the world, serving as an important cultural repository in the diaspora. The music, usually performed in a minor key, made its way to the United States, but soon disappeared. In the late '60s and '70s, musicians and historians began to rediscover klezmer and its significance, leading to a revival period that continues today, and includes several acts that combine traditional styles with more contemporary sounds, such as the Klezmatics.

Now, a strong klezmer album has appeared from an unlikely source: Constellation, an independent label from Montreal that's known for its post-rock bands with their sonic expansiveness and cinematic expressions. Constellation is now home to Black Ox Orkestar, a klezmer quartet from Montreal that claims as influences not only tradition European Jewish folk music, but also indie rock and free jazz. The concept sounds highbrow and, while it certainly involves an intelligent approach to playing, its results often strike the gut more than the head. After all, new music frequently involves an accretion of various styles, and Black Ox Orkestar (which include members from Constellation's Silver Mt. Zion and Sackville) simply show a standard process utilizing original parts.

On the group's debut album Ver Tanzt?, the music relies most heavily on Eastern klezmer styles, although a hint of Morocco lies in some of the tracks. Most of the disc's tracks are updated versions of traditional folk songs, with a nod to jazz found more in the band's approach then in its sound. The three originals -- opener "Shvartze Flamen, Vayser Fayer", "Ver Tanzt?", and "Toyte Goyes in Shineln" -- fit the mold of the other pieces, and are indistinguishable as original, a fact that compliments both the band's songwriting and its steadiness in performance.

Although the album maintains a steady tone through out, Black Ox Orkestar varies tempo and mood enough to keep the individual tracks interesting. Slow, dirge-like numbers are off-set by more stomping, militant-sounding pieces, and each track by the band, unlike many of their labelmates, is relatively short. The orchestration of instruments -- usual suspects such as guitar, violin, mandolin, as well as contrabass, harmonium, and others -- remains fairly steady, but different instruments come to the fore on each of the tracks. The percussive melody on "Skocne" provides a particularly nice change of pace toward the end of the album.

I suspect most of you are in the same boat as me: you don't speak Yiddish and won't be able to understand the lyrics. However, you shouldn't be put off by that, as singer Scott Levine Gilmore's vocals are expressive enough to make a literal rendering often feel unnecessary. Gilmore's voice fits in like another instrument, and the band uses it much the way that Sigur Ros (who even sing in their made-up "Hopelandic") use vocals. If you are able to understand Yiddish, on the other hand, you'll be in for what appears to be a challenging political discourse. If you can get the message, the band has transliterated an original Yiddish poem for you in their liner notes. "Who's Dancing?" includes the lines "Do the oppressed mirror the oppressor? / The beaten child is in the street with fists / And the sad race of wise men / Sends brutes / To the border." The poem reveals the politically taut nature of the band. The members draw their music from the Jewish heritage and speak about history, using a medium important to those outside of Israel; at the same time, they question the efficacy of Zionist attitudes.

Black Ox Orkestar have entered the indie rock scene with music unlike anything else on that scene before them, and they've done so by reaching to the past. It's an odd compound of sound, and yet it's highly effective. In mixing a variety of influences and traditions, the band has created an album that's backward looking and forward thinking, as well as challenging and moving.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image