Breath and Bones by Susann Cokal

Megan Milks

It was an exciting time to be in America in all of its gritty splendor, and Cokal depicts it with authority and obvious pleasure.

Breath and Bones

Publisher: Unbridled Books
Length: 384
Price: $23.95
Author: Susann Cokal
US publication date: 2005-05
Amazon affiliate

Who here remembers Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego? You know, the computer game from the '80s that spun off into an early '90s TV show featuring the totally rad house band Rockapella? I do, I do! And I can honestly say that this game and its TV-show sister laid the groundwork for all of my geographical knowledge.

I mention it because Susann Cokal's second novel, Breath and Bones, brought all of that globe-trotting detective work rushing back. But while the computer game's Carmen has the whole world at her feet, Cokal bases her novel primarily in 19th century America. The queen of crime gets replaced by a decidedly noncriminal British painter named Albert Castle, and the gumshoe detective is now Castle's former model and lover, Famke Summerfugl (aliases Ursula Summerfield and Dante Castle), who sniffs out various clues to Albert's whereabouts and always seems to miss him by a hair.

The plot may sound flimsy -- whee, a superhot girl chases after her ex-lover -- but within it lies a historical richness that is Cokal's greatest strength, and which she used just as well in her first novel, Mirabilis. Just when you start yawning at Famke's relentless wild good chase, Cokal snaps you back with Mormons capitalizing on the Chinese silkworm, or with the era's now-bizarre-seeming treatments for tuberculosis, of which Famke is a victim. Cokal draws a many-layered America, full of polygamists, wide-eyed immigrants, yellow journalists, and prostitutes, all of whom are tantalized into the push West by the promised double whammy of adventure and wealth. It was an exciting time to be in America in all of its gritty splendor, and Cokal depicts it with authority and obvious pleasure. For that, I forgive her the book's overlong narrative.

What I have a harder time forgiving is the hotness factor. Cokal's Famke is a naïve Swedish orphan who has grown up a sexually bold PYT in Denmark in the 1880s. An exotically pale redhead who stops men dead in their tracks and at one point has four dudes tailing her, Famke is eightch-oh-tee hot. As she makes her way across America, she is constantly privileged by her beauty -- her flaming red hair and tragically pale, tuberculan skin. Must beauty and tragedy always be linked?

But this doesn't do Cokal's novel, or her protagonist, justice. Famke is resourceful and fearless, if a little vain. By setting up this character as a flawed, tragic, and as such, extremely sympathetic, figure (and oh, what a figure she has!), Cokal sets up the reader to recognize with dislike all those who seek to control her. And there are many, mostly men, who cannot get enough of Famke. Not for Famke's character, mind you, but for her peerless beauty. If she didn't know how to take advantage of her looks, she would be trapped by them. Still, aware of her vulnerability as a woman, and as a pretty woman at that, she ends up cross-dressing for much of her journey.

There is an intriguing feminist statement contained in this post-feminist reimagining of 19th century America. During Famke's short life, she is literally mythologized in Albert's paintings, many of which are recreations of mythical scenes. Willfully, she becomes both muse and myth. Halfway in, however, the roles reverse and Famke, dressed as a man, becomes not just the objectified but the objectifier, reworking for pocket money the paintings left behind by Albert as he visited boomtown after boomtown. As she takes up the artist role, however, Famke paints herself (as a woman). In so doing, Famke becomes her own muse.

This motif is reinforced by the "treatment" for tuberculosis that her doctor and admirer -- who privately thinks of Famke as "Ophelia" -- prescribes: numerous masturbation sessions with the aid of what must be the precursor to the modern vibrator. ("It is another means of flushing," he tell her.) How Famke loves this wonder of medical innovations.

Which brings me to the irksome wink-wink nature of some of Cokal's inside jokes with the reader. Cokal's style is, overall, charming and wonderfully engaging. Few literary pyrotechnics here, and the story is better for it. But, come on, can we just say it? Crotch. Groin. Cunt. There, some alternatives for the "Down There" that Cokal too liberally employs throughout the novel, most often when Famke smirks at the art world's denial that women grow hair "Down There" (tee hee), instead depicting naked women with fictitious Brazilian waxes. Quite right, my dear Famke. But as she indicts the art world's denial of pubes, shouldn't Famke indict herself for using a euphemism for said pubes? You can't have it both ways.

Cokal frames her novel with a related prologue and epilogue twenty-odd years beyond the time period of the narrative. From the first five pages, the reader knows that Famke ends up dead, her young body preserved by a posse of admiring men in an upright glass coffin full of alcohol or something. (I'm giving nothing away.) After playing the role of immortals in myth, Famke achieves her own sort of immortality. Even as she redefined the notions of myth and muse while inhabiting them in life, she ends up with her image ultimately, and literally, assembled and preserved by men. Through not-so-subtle dialogue and a description of the preserved corpse, Cokal ensures that these men are seen as fools, and we are left with an image of a pretty dead thing caged behind glass. Is this not fucked-up?, Cokal seems to ask, then answers: Yes. Yes, it is.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.