Music

Bullet for My Valentine: Scream Aim Fire

Bullet for My Valentine's second record is an embarrassing slump that shoots at heavy and political targets and makes a disastrous mess of it.


Bullet for My Valentine

Scream Aim Fire

Label: Jive
US Release Date: 2008-01-29
UK Release Date: 2008-01-28
Amazon
iTunes

"Our new album is going to be our heaviest ever!"

Metal fans hear this con from artists feeling the need to cheaply self-promote their new album so often, it’s a wonder everyone hasn’t seen through it by now. Very, very rarely does a band actually shape up to this promise and deliver an earth-shattering, brutal release without losing their character. Far more often the self-important musician behind the above statement will unwittingly fall flat on his or her face, with their bandmates in tow.

There was nothing particularly special about Bullet for My Valentine’s debut, The Poison, except for a few likable, hook-laden guilty pleasures in "Tears Don’t Fall" and "All These Things I Hate (Revolve Around Me)" that eventually found radio play on both sides of the Atlantic. With a lucky break going for them, God only knows why the Welsh quartet think they have something to prove on their sophomore Scream Aim Fire. Not that the album is that much different from their first effort, really, as Bullet for My Valentine’s idea of going ‘heavy’ is to rehash their slick stadium metalcore and add more double-kick to the drums, while amplifying frontman Matt Tuck’s flexible vocals into a tuneless rasp. The man was recovering from laryngitis as recently as the beginning of last year; he should be sketching out the range of his singing tone here, not straining his vocal chords more. In one stupendously ill-advised nosedive, they’ve gone from the UK figurehead of the metalcore scene to yet another ensemble making a tired snatch at credibility by ripping off Ride the Lightning-era Metallica.

Scream Aim Fire’s artwork depicts the austere white pillars of justice circled by vultures and about to be overtaken by a storm, thus satisfying the band’s requisite ‘big statement’ quota. It doesn’t matter that they’re struggling with their own identity and inevitable growing pains -- that only makes it all the more laughable that its amateurishness is advertised from the front cover inwards. Such folly is driven by a purpose; Bullet for My Valentine would really like you to believe they have a deep-rooted political standing, when in reality Tuck has just switched from writing emo songs about hating yourself for losing her to writing about nothing at all. "Eye of the Storm" is as literal-minded as its title suggests; it’s actually a description of him experiencing "Mother Nature’s fury" (a pretty elementary one, too, at that).

The lyrics are on a parallel with the music’s one-dimensionality and tonelessness, the choruses are even more samey and interchangeable than they were on The Poison. There is also a greater distance than ever between dreary pedal to the metal numb-rock and equally insipid mushy power ballads, swinging the album’s core into sudden highs and lows throughout like a diabetic. Words are at a loss to describe how jarring it is, after all the obstinate tough-guy posturing, to be jolted into Simple Plan angst about broken homes ("Hearts Burst into Fire") without a moment’s warning.

Nonetheless, single "Scream Aim Fire" is mindless fun, as long as you don’t follow the lyrics. Tuck is frighteningly insincere, and so focused on being hardcore that he steers his group through an unconvincing breakdown towards the end. He gets to grunt the title over and over, never matching the steely intensity of when the guitars and drums lock in for a few pile-driving seconds in the chorus. The metal tomfoolery stumbles on at its most contrived and generic afterwards: "Disappear" recycles a pissed-off crowd chant in flimsy emulation of Machine Head’s far more visceral "Clenching the Fists of Dissent", while "Deliver Us from Evil" and "Take It Out on Me" limp on for longer than they have any right to.

I question the intelligence of any band that names a song "Say Goodnight" when their record isn’t finished yet (false hope is a dangerous thing, lads), and that plus follower "End of Days" unsurprisingly succumb to girly-man sloganeering ("With every hour / Give me the power!"). On the latter, Tuck realizes we’re all "born to die" and plugs it for the rest of the track like he’s the new Nietzsche. I’m going to restrain myself from making a sarcastic comment. Nothing could possibly be worse, though, than the snivelling, banal piece of trash that is "Forever and Always", intended as an in-band salute to each other and all their fans for ‘sticking with it’:

Forget about the shit that we’ve been through

I wanna stay here forever and always

Standing here in front of all of you

I wanna stay here forever and always

If you dare imagine the kind of sop-drenched backing that written atrocity is set to, you’re far more tolerant than me. Even the guitar solo and handclaps rub off horribly stilted. I can only faintly hope that Tuck, who clearly doesn’t believe a word of what he’s singing (he’s about as emotional as Daft Punk), truly knows that he owes those that admire his band more than this vapid, spineless, offensively bad schlock. Maybe in the future these hacks will have something worth saying. Maybe age, experience, record sales or a combination of all three will mature them. The bottom line is: this disastrously inconsistent and lyrically moronic record isn’t it. And that’s Bullet for My Valentine’s sophomore outing in a nutshell. I’d love to pull it apart in more detail, but I’ve run out of adjectives to express my disdain.

3

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image