'Captain America: Civil War': Bang, Punch, Kick, Shake Hands

Iron Man and Captain America split up the Avengers for an evenly matched and oddly friendly (sometimes witty) showdown.

Captain America: Civil War

Cast: Chris Evans, Robert Downey Jr., Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Anthony Mackie, Don VanCamp, Tom Holland, Daniel Bruhl, Frank Grillo, William Hurt, Martin Freeman, Marisa Tomei, John Kani, John Slattery, Alfre Woodard
Rated: PG-13
Studio: Marvel Entertainment
Year: 2016

When Shakespeare wrote about the “quality of mercy” in The Merchant of Venice, chances are he wasn’t thinking about perpetually quipping guys in shiny suits slamming each other into walls. Nevertheless, Captain America: Civil War takes up that generosity of spirit from its start. For all the heavy metal clanging and grunting in the film’s many fight scenes, it's clear that everyone just wants to forgive everyone else and get back to being friends.

In part that’s due to the inalterable economics of franchise filmmaking. The Avengers as a concept holds that there's always another threat coming down the pike, so the band will always get back together. Regardless of their occasional conflicts, these superheroes enjoy hanging out together. Who wouldn’t? Their headquarters is a sunny, comfortable kind of space, with coffee and cereal in the kitchen. Everybody has a decent sense of humor, the walking and talking AI Vision (Paul Bettany) works as a decent cyber-butler, and Tony Stark (Robert Downey, Jr.) seems happy to pay for pretty much anything.

Like so many comic book movie series now, the rift between the superheroes has to do with mortals' foolishness. Although the audience knows the Avengers have everyone’s best interests at heart, the human population is starting to get sick of them smashing up office buildings and people's homes. Mirroring the disquiet in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, where citizens and politicians argued over collateral damage, Civil War features a rundown of the Avengers' greatest hits as seen from another, non-superheroic perspective. In the video montage prepared by a punitive Secretary of State (William Hurt), the Avengers’ great victories against Ultron and other supervillains appear on screen as if from the angle of people on the ground, getting crushed, drowned, and maimed by all the towering buildings and airborne carriers being flung around.

Unlike Zack Snyder’s brutal and brutally dull grudge match, however, Captain America: Civil War tries at least briefly to wrestle with the question at hand. Are these heroes with superpowers really altruistic or are they just ego-tripping? The same anxiety over the drones era broached in Captain America: Winter Soldier reverberates here, though in a less targeted manner. Is it possible, as Vision suggests, that the team is actually causing more problems simply by their existence?

That’s the rub dividing the team into two polarities. Iron Man argues for an international accord that sets up a United Nations council regulating the Avengers, so they'll pursue no missions without authorization. The opposing side follows Captain America (Chris Evans), previously a dotting-the-i’s kind of guy, now gone rogue.

They’ve both got perfectly good reasons. Stark feels guilt wants to keep the powers that be from killing his old friend, the now-reformed but once-brainwashed assassin Bucky Barnes/Winter Soldier (Sebastian Stan), whom Stark calls the “Manchurian Candidate”, well after the audience has thought it. Their teammates seem less deeply invested in causes, taking sides more to keep things evenly matched than anything else.

The sides are filled out, certainly: writers Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely assemble enough superheroes here to cast three Netflix series and another couple of offshoot-Avengers movies without anybody having to be in more than one of them. But that also makes Captain America: Civil War sometimes confusing. Any viewer is going to have at least a a few moments, particularly in the sprawling mega-battle about two-thirds through, where they wonder, “Hey, I thought she was with them” or even “Wait, who’s that?”

Overcrowding is an ongoing problem for the Avengers. Here the franchise masters give big bold introductions to some new additions to the super-family, like Black Panther (Chadwick Boseman) and yet another iteration of Spider-Man (Tom Holland). They also keep other storylines going by threading in heroes like Ant-Man (Paul Rudd) for comic relief -- on top of that already supplied by the rest of the perennially wisecracking gang. There are times when the film almost seems to be showing off its supporting cast decisions, and for good reason. Whoever hired John Slattery to play Tony Stark's father clearly understands the finer details of properly delivered sarcasm.

Like Captain America: Winter Soldier and the better moments of the Joss Whedon films, Captain America: Civil War works better as big group caper film than action extravaganza. You almost wish that Marvel could just find time in between all the gearing up for the next line of Spider-Man entries and the upcoming Infinity War two-parter, so that two of the team members could just go on a road trip or something. Imagine it: Stark and Rogers on a mission that has them driving across country incognito, no shield, no suit. They bicker, indulge in hijinks, and eventually learn a few things about each other.

Sure, some people would miss the big fight scenes, but that’s not what delivers the entertainment in Captain America: Civil War. This isn’t a film, it’s a clubhouse where everyone would like to be a member.


This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

If The Prince of Nothingwood will popularly be remembered for celebrating the creative spirit of its star Salim Shaheen, it is equally an important communication on Afghanistan, it's culture and its people.

"Now I am just more tired and poor. So no, I haven't changed. I'm just older and more tired," says French radio journalist and documentarian Sonia Kronlund, as she looks back on the experience of making The Prince of Nothingwood (2017).

Joining Salim Shaheen, the most popular and prolific actor-director-producer in Afghanistan on his 111th no budget feature, Kronlund documents the week-long shoot and the events surrounding it. She crafts an insight into a larger than life persona, yet amidst the comedy and theatricality of Shaheen and his troupe of collaborators, she uncovers the heavier tones of the everyday reality of war and patriarchal oppression. If The Prince of Nothingwood will popularly be remembered for celebrating the creative spirit of its star, it is equally an important communication on Afghanistan, it's culture and its people. Alongside the awareness of the country cultivated by mainstream media news outlets, Kronlund's film offers an insight into a country that can humanise the prejudice and xenophobic tendencies of a western perspective towards Afghanistan.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.