Carpe Diem: Put a Little Latin in Your Life by Harry Mount

Frank Wilson
The Philadelphia Inquirer (MCT)

Seize the Latin, or fun with a dead language.

Carpe Diem: Put a Little Latin in Your Life

Publisher: Hyperion
ISBN: 9781401322342
Author: Harry Mount
Price: $19.95
Length: 272
Formats: Hardcover
US publication date: 2007-11

If memory serves -- and that tells you something right there -- I had five years of Latin in school, three in high school, two in college. I think I started off pretty well: I remember some A's in my first year. Unfortunately, the Law of Diminishing Returns eventually exerted its irresistible power, and I was soon down to B's, and then C's. But I did pass. I always seemed to be able to scrape by with enough correct answers on the grammar and vocabulary tests, and to make my way more or less ignorantly and uncertainly toward the gist of what we were called upon to translate.

So Harry Mount's charming little book Carpe Diem: Put a Little Latin in Your Life would seem to be right down my alley. "In brief," Mount writes, "if you already know the bare bones of Latin" -- which is about all I can honestly claim to know -- "by the time you've finished this book, your dormant knowledge ("dormio," "dormire" -- I sleep) will have woken up."

In fact, even "if you have no knowledge, dormant or otherwise you'll have the basics, which should mean you'll at least be able to translate ... the simple Latin -- but all the more moving for that -- of Leonardo Bruni's epitaph in the church of Santa Croce in Florence." (The English translation awaits you on the last page of the book.)

So here's the epitaph:

"Postquam Leonardus e vita migravit

Historia luget; eloquentia muta est

Ferturque musas tum Graecas tum

Latinas lacrimas tenere non potuisse."

Actually, I thought I had a pretty good idea right off the bat as to what the epitaph was getting at, which led me to think my ignorance was not quite as abysmal as I supposed. Alas, as Mount wended his way blithely through declensions and conjugations, subjunctives and ablatives, and less and less of what he was explaining adhered to my consciousness, I began to feel exactly as I had in those classrooms long ago: not quite on top of the material at hand.

So his book had a peculiar and somewhat paradoxical effect on me: However much I might miss being young, I am certainly glad to no longer be a student in a Latin class.

Mount, by the way, would approve of my splitting the infinitive in the foregoing sentence. "English pedants," he notes, "date their dislike of a split infinitive from Latin. Since you can't split a Latin infinitive because it's a single word, you shouldn't do it in English." But, he points out, " `to boldly go where no man has gone before' ... actually sounds better than `Boldly to go ...' or `To go boldly ...,' and is easily translated into Latin -- "Ire audacter eo quo nemo antea." (That's obviously worth remembering if you plan to attend a Star Trek convention.)

Mount thinks the world of Latin, but his enthusiasm is grounded in reality. "To say you need to understand Latin to understand English, as some people do say," he writes, "is as crazy as suggesting you need to understand Anglo-Saxon, German, and Norman French to understand English."

He notes cannily that "the only reason you will understand English better as a result of reading Latin is because it is so different from Latin, not because of any similarities. It is in computing the changes from one language to another that you are forced to think about the structure of each of them."

No, Mount says, "the really useful thing about Latin is ... that it will help you to understand Latin, in which some of the most stirring prose and poetry ever was written."

It is this evident passion for both the Latin language and the literature it gave birth to -- as well as Roman "tempora et mores" (come on, you can figure that out, right?), about which he writes so entertainingly -- that lends force to Mount's disappointment over how much the study of Latin has lately declined in his native Britain, where "the number of children studying Latin in private schools and the remaining grammar schools has collapsed" -- from 60,000 doing the tough O level in 1960 to 10,000 doing a more basic replacement today. (In the United States, he notes, "there's a bit of a revival going on." In 1977, only 6,000 students took the National Latin Exam. By 2005 that number had soared to 134,873.)

As for me, I'm going to take Mount's parting advice and get the Loeb classic translations of Horace, Catullus, and Caesar's "Gallic Wars" and see if I can get my Latin up to speed.

Oh, and the translation of Leonardo Bruni's epitaph that appears on the last page? I'd quote it, but that would spoil the fun of reading Mount's book, wouldn't it?


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.