Charlie Hunter Trio: Copperopolis

Jazz-jam guitarist and his trio proceed to make the funky good-time rock music you crazy kids are so fond of.

Charlie Hunter Trio


Label: Rope-a-Dope
US Release Date: 2006-02-07
UK Release Date: 2006-02-06
iTunes affiliate
Amazon affiliate
Insound affiliate

Charlie Hunter has become a richly versatile jazz guitarist in the last decade, even if he did start out as a "gimmick" player on a par with Stanley Jordan. Do you remember Jordan? Maybe not, and that's the point.

Stanley Jordan, like Mr. Hunter, was signed to and hyped by Blue Note (jazz's current Cadillac label, what with both Norah Jones and Wynton Marsalis on the roster). His gimmick was that he played the guitar like it was a piano -- finger-tapping the fret board with both hands to achieve a unique sound that enchanted . . . briefly. For a few years during the Reagan administration, he was the star of jazz, then . . . poof!

Hunter's gimmick is an eight-string guitar, allowing him to cover both guitar and bass duties at the same time with remarkable independence and agility. As an economic matter, it's a salary-saver, allowing The Charlie Hunter Trio to sound more like a quintet, Hunter on bass and guitar and saxophonist David Ellis doubling on Wurlitzer electric piano and melodia. It's as an artistic improvement over Mr. Jordan's oeuvre too -- something that works with a band (Jordan's good stuff was all solo) and something that plays dirty, pretty, out and in, equally well.

And so it is that Hunter has transcended the gimmick to play compelling music, a fervent and juiced brand of jam-jazz that has ranged from Medeski, Martin, and Wood groove to spare duets with drummer Leon Parker to a full-album cover of Marley's Natty Dread to accompaniments for vocalists as diverse as Kurt Elling and Mos Def. And in all that diversity of style and context, his "gimmick" has served him well as a through-line of personality. He's a soulful jazz guitarist who has assimilated influences across all of blues-based music. Pretty incredible.

Copperopolis is a back-to-basics record, a rockin' outing for guitar, drums, and tenor sax that works as "instrumental rock" or as boogie jazz for the day after tomorrow. The drummer Derrick Phillips powers it all with a backbeat that never feels fake or falsely "funky". This is not a processed, smoove jazz operation. But at the same time, it's not a loose-limbed Phish-fest either. It's a snatch of Hendrix on "Cueball Bobbin'" a dirt-drenched blues; it's a N'awlins second-line Latin feel on "Swamba Redux"; it's a slow-drag 12/8 groove for unison tenor/guitar on the title track, conjuring the hippest strip club you've ever seen in an old movie; and it's a cute Scofield-esque line on "Blue Sock" that gets you bobbing your head forward-and-back, forward-and-back. "The Pursuit Package" is Dick Dale meets Ennio Morricone, and "Drop the Rock" is an effectively cinematic mood ballad. And just so you deep jazz fans don't feel neglected, Mr. Hunter closes things out with a Meters-y version of Monk's "Think of One" that opens up plenty of space for Ellis to blow over a combination of Phillips groove and Hunter in a Frisell-ian mood. Great variety, but through it all there is home-cooked backbeat aplenty.

For all that, Copperopolis is merely a very good and fun record. It knows what it is about, and so do you -- it's comfortable in its licks and riffs and powerfully tight rhythm section playing. But maybe like a very good romantic comedy or a very well done adventure movie, it comes along at a time when we've seen quite a few already. Like I said, it's a back-to-basics exercise, and so: basic it is. The band plays together the way a true working band should, but no soloist really stretches out or discovers anything new or personal. There are no surprises or dramatic stories here. You should certainly catch these guys in concert, and you'll find everything on Copperopolis perfectly in place. But this also might be that record you put on when you're studying or cooking dinner -- a disc that, if you're not careful, might glide by in the background only half-noticed.

But maybe that's the price of being a very fine and also somewhat prolific and scattershot instrumentalist: they're not all masterpieces.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.