Supernatural: The Vic Chesnutt Re-issues

Michael Metivier


The Vic Chesnutt Re-issues


July, 1999: Vic Chesnutt is playing the Iron Horse in Northampton, Massachusetts, taking an occasional request from the peanut gallery. From the back of the house a man calls out "Speed Racer!" to which Vic replies "Naw, that one's too hard." It's a heavy request. The song, in which Vic belts out "I'm not a victim, I'm an atheist!" is from his first record, Little. It has become one of the iconic Vic Chesnutt songs in a body of work that offers almost nothing but. "Speed Racer" is also the title Peter Sillen chose for his 1992 documentary on the Athens, Georgia songwriter. It's an overwhelmingly powerful, personal song, so it's no surprise that it's both a fan favorite and a live rarity. The audience member doesn't relent: "It's my birthday!" Chesnutt's eyes narrow as he leans forward a bit. There's an uncomfortable pause before he mutters, "You lying motherfucker." Then he starts to play... "Speed Racer".

June, 2004: After years of out-of-print status for Little and the rest of Vic Chesnutt's early oeuvre, the mighty "Speed Racer" can once again be heard at whim -- even if it's not your birthday. Little, West of Rome (1992), Drunk (1993), and Is the Actor Happy? (1995) were all originally released on the now-defunct Texas Hotel label. For a few years after its demise, one could still find the odd CD copy on a retail shelf, or buy a cassette from the man himself on one of his many journeys across Europe and the States. Otherwise, his back catalog mired in legal tar pits, you were out of luck. No more: New West Records, who released Vic's most recent album, Silver Lake, have picked up and re-released all four, with liner notes by folks such as Michael Stipe and Fugazi's Ian MacKaye, expanded artwork, and generous helpings of bonus tracks. Rejoice.

Little (1990)
Little was recorded in one day: October 6th, 1988. The session was produced by Michael Stipe at John Keane's studio in Athens, Georgia. New West's reissue presents the original 10 songs with five bonus tracks that complete the session. As Stipe's liner notes recall, "That I got producer credit on this LP is a laugh -- there wasn't a whole lot to do". The production is indeed bare-bones. The songs are Chesnutt, his nylon-stringed guitar, and few embellishments. Harmonica, female harmonies, and ghostly keyboards are employed with deliberate care when needed.
:. read the full essay

West of Rome (1992)
Although every one of his albums has been hailed as his best, West of Rome is the fan favorite by general consensus. The reason is hard to pin down, though as filmmaker/photographer Jem Cohen points out in the liner notes to its reissue, everything about it "is just right". Michael Stipe's production on the album is more involved than on Little, with nearly every song featuring Jeffrey Richards on drums and wife Tina Chesnutt on bass, with appearances by Vic's nieces "wherever Michael 'heard'" their respective violin and cello, Ray Neal, Kelly Keneipp, and Stipe himself. The performances are loose and woolly, every bit deserving of the "ramshackle folk" tag Q magazine once used to describe Vic's music.
:. read the full essay

Drunk (1993)
Vic Chesnutt's third album, Drunk, was recorded before his second, West of Rome, was even released. But when Drunk dropped a year later, it was a very different beast, a prickly, cantankerous beast at that. It's his most difficult record, musically and otherwise. Just when you've found a delicate moment to latch onto, it squirms out of your hands and scratches you on its way down. This is all to say Drunk's a hell of a lot of ragged fun.
:. read the full essay

Is the Actor Happy? (1995)
"I was supposed to tell you the case of a cult / It's called the cult of inspiration and it is rewarding", Vic Chesnutt sings on his fourth record, Is the Actor Happy?, referencing the artists' collective he belonged to along with Lambchop's Kurt Wagner and others. The full member list has never to my knowledge been revealed, but Chesnutt has had a knack over the years for fruitful collaborations and partnerships.
:. read the full essay

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.