Coming to Wherever You Are - Muchmusic, MTV and Youth Identities by Kip Pegley

A comparative study of MuchMusic and MTV that examines how each relates to issues and perceptions of gender and nationality, racial diversity, and an overall sense of cultural identity.

Coming to Wherever You Are

Publisher: Wesleyan University Press
Subtitle: MuchMusic, MTV, and Youth Identities
Author: Kip Pegley
Price: 24.95
Length: 168
ISBN: 978-081956870
US publication date: 2008-06-30

Coming to Wherever You Are: Muchmusic, MTV and Youth Identities is purported to be a cross-cultural look at music television. Kip Pegley, an associate professor at Queen's University School of Music in Ontario sets out to compare and contrast the US-based MTV music channel (and its affiliates worldwide) with Toronto's MuchMusic and its international stations.

Pegley asserts that Canada has long resisted MTV as a primary music video channel (although there is an MTV Canada affiliate) both because of the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) policies prohibiting new stations that replicate existing channels' content, and because MuchMusic is viewed as addressing its audience as distinctly Canadian by providing cultural content reflecting a distinctly Canadian aesthetic.

But are the two representations of popular culture really so very different? Pegley aims to answer this through a comparative study of each station's musical programming and non-musical branding. She also examines how each relates to issues and perceptions of gender and nationality, racial diversity, and an overall sense of cultural identity.

Early in the book, Pegley outlines the purposes and parameters of this study. She intended to study the broader identities of MuchMusic and MTV, and their respective audiences, as well as specific content, including ads, rotation schedules, program titles, hosts and VJs, and music videos. For the purposes of comparing the music video content, Pegley chose to sample playlists for the week of 4-11 November 1995. (This week was chosen because it fell between the "important" events of Halloween and American Thanksgiving. Why these events were deemed so important is unclear.) The study parameters included musical genre (genre designations were based on the song's sonic qualities, the video's visual style, and the relationship between performer and audience as depicted in the video); the gender, race, and nationality of the performer; the performance force, language of lyrics, quantity of lyrics, and the film qualities of the video itself, among others.

Pegley then devotes a chapter to each of the above-mentioned issues. Chapter two, titled, "It's All Just Fluffy White Clouds": The Extra-Musical Imagined Communities is an overview of each channel's entire televised content. Chapter three, "Simple Economics": Images of Gender and Nationality explores the connections between woman, instrumentation, and expressions of nationality by comparing the difference in instrumental performances by women. Pegley asserts that, during the sample week, two markedly different coherent subgroups -- the female Euro-American and the female Euro-Canadian -- were presented, and that these two groups represented and reinforced separate national narratives (videos informing this assertion included those by Hole, Smashing Pumpkins, and Alanis Morissette).

Chapter four Multiculturalism, Diversity and Containment is perhaps the most interesting because it addresses the subject in a more in-depth manner than other chapters. It explores how each station expanded and changed, from the 1980s into the 1990s, in relation to the concepts of multiculturalism and ethnocentricity. This section provides detailed discussion on the underrepresentation and marginalization of black artists on both channels, and how the issue has, or hasn't, been addressed over the years. (For instance, consider the change from MTV's early claims that these artists weren't picked up because of the perception that a white audience wouldn't think of them as "rock", to Yo! MTV Raps.) It is suggested that MuchMusic isn't criticized for racial marginalization perhaps because it has received less attention overall, but also perhaps as a result of the CRTC's early cultural inclusion policies.

Pegley follows this section with MuchMusic and MTV: The Finnish Context, which presents each station's international marketing strategies, analyzing how such strategies reshape the local markets and music scenes as well as viewers' attitudes toward their environment. Pegley cites a case study in Finland, where MTV Nordic and Jyrki (a MuchMusic brand and format airing in an after-school time-slot) were direct competition. She discusses how both the local and global tensions in video music production, dissemination, and consumption caused cultural fluctuations which had measurable effects on the Finnish youth population of the period. The ramifications of this are unclear. However, it's still an interesting look at how each of these -- by now accepted as entirely divergent -- entities operates and wields influence in an international setting.

The concluding chapter essentially reiterates everything Pegley stated in the introduction, not only the step-by-step of her study, but the less thinly-veiled championing of MuchMusic. She also states that her original goal was to analyze MuchMusic, merely using MTV as a secondary source. In this then, perhaps she has succeeded. In closing paragraphs, she writes, "I, too, appreciate MuchMusic's unique contribution to popular culture within Canada, its spontaneity and its accessibility." She then qualifies that this should not exempt the station from cultural criticism. As Coming to Wherever You Are: Muchmusic, MTV and Youth Identities is sure to be included in future popular culture and music studies curricula, it's sure that MuchMusic won't be left out of the discussion anymore.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.