Connie Stevens: The Complete Warner Bros. Singles

The songs provide a glimpse into that transitional era between the conservative '50s and the turbulent '60s -- when everything was changing.

Connie Stevens

The Complete Warner Bros. Singles

Label: Real Gone
US Release Date: 2011-11-08

Connie Stevens was always more of a cypher than a star in the early '60s. She played the smart-dumb blonde in a series of television appearances (most notably as photographer/singer Cricket Blake in the hit show Hawaiian Eye, 1959-1963), Hollywood movies, and Broadway productions. Sure, she was eye candy, but there was always something more than just that to her performances.

This was especially true on her records. Stevens' complete Warner Brothers singles from 1959 to 1966 have just been compiled and released, mostly in their original glorious mono. The three dozen sides include everything, even the ridiculous -- such as top ten hit “Kookie, Kookie (Lend Me your Comb)”, in which she and Hawaiian Eye co-star Edd Byrnes make hipster talk over a campy cool instrumental accompaniment. But the collection also contains the more sublime, such as the four Gerry Goffin / Carole King compositions “Why’d You Wanna Make Me Cry”, “I Couldn’t Say No”, “They’re Jealous of Me”, and “Don’t You Want to Love Me”. Evoking distaff romantic angst with an edge is Petula Clark’s dramatic “Now That You’ve Gone” and the dreamy Tim Hardin composition “It Will Never Happen Again.” And then there's everything in between, such as two German releases (sung in Deutsch), “La Le Lu” and “Man Soll Sich So Schnell Nicht Verlieben”, some Hank Williams’ covers (“Hey, Good Lookin’” and “Nobody’s Lonesome For Me”), and other odds and ends.

However evocative or strange or goofy or even transcendent the aforementioned titles may be, this anthology seems much more interesting as an artifact than as art. The songs provide a glimpse into that transitional era between the conservative '50s and the turbulent '60s -- when everything was changing. Although Stevens was in her 20s, she had a fresh and innocent look and pandered to the teen audience on songs like “Sixteen Reasons” (which was her biggest hit, peaking at number three on the charts), “A Little Kiss is A Kiss is a Kiss”, “Why Do I Cry for Joey”, “Make Believe Lover”, and other fluff from the era. She sang about desire in nonphysical terms, as if love began and ended with just a kiss. Some of this is code. As Peter, Paul, and Mary once noted, “If you really say it / the radio won’t play it”, and the implications of a song like “I Couldn’t Say No” are clear, even if Stevens just mentions giving away her kiss to someone she just met.

Stevens’ material didn’t change much in topic, even as the teen world did -- especially after the British Invasion. That’s probably why her later material failed to chart. While the go-go rhythms of “How Bitter the Taste of Love” and the Bacharach-style horns on “All My Life” from 1966 reveal a more sophisticated songstress, she’s still the girl longing for her true love. With the benefit of time, songs like these sound like should have been hits, but compared to radio fare of the time, such as the Rolling Stones’ “Paint it Black”, Beach Boys “Good Vibrations”, Percy Sledge’s “When a Man Loves a Woman”, and “Buffalo Springfield’s “For What it’s Worth”, Stevens sounds immature, even to teenagers.

Stevens career as a singer declined, but her work as an actor continues into the present day. In fact, in 2005, she was voted elected secretary-treasurer of the Screen Actors’ Guild, the union’s second highest position. She has a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame and, like Elizabeth Taylor and Debbie Reynolds, was once married and divorced from Eddie Fisher. But the songs on this disc predate her marriage. They reflect the dreams of a younger girl when getting married was the final step of a woman’s initiation into the adult’s world. She didn’t want to be a child anymore. While being a big girl might not seem especially liberated to modern ears, it was considered so by her young teen fans at the time before The Beatles came and changed everything.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.