Daredevil: The Devil, Inside and Out Vol. 1-2

Jason A. Zwiker

This is a man making complex choices and compromises; no longer the devil-may-care swashbuckler with the simple liberty of always doing what’s right.

Daredevil: The Devil, Inside and Out Vol. 1-2

Publisher: Marvel Comics
Contributors: Artists: Michael Lark, Stefano Gaudiano, David Aja
Price: $14.99
Writer: Ed Brubaker
Length: 144
Formats: Trade Paperback
First date: 2006-10-25
Last date: 2007-04-18
Writer website

If you had lost everything -- your career, home, friends, and freedom; the simple ability to walk down the streets you'd known since childhood -- what would you do if presented with the chance to get it all back? What would you do or, more to the point, what wouldn't you do?

This is the essential question of The Devil, Inside and Out, a story that redefines Matt Murdock even as his life is sewn back together.

It's been one hell of a ride for Murdock over the last few years. He watched Karen Page die at the hands of one of his most hated enemies, beat Wilson Fisk, Kingpin of Crime, to the ground, declared himself to be the new kingpin of Hell's Kitchen, and stood revealed in the press as the vigilante Daredevil.

Brian Bendis and Alex Maleev had already torn most of Murdock's life asunder before Ed Brubaker took over the writing reins. The transition in creative teams occurred at one of the most jarring moments in the history of the character, but the talent of the people involved made it seamless. Bendis and Maleev finished their run on the series with Murdock disbarred as an attorney and placed behind bars, pending trial, then Brubaker and Lark told the story of what happened next.

The Devil, Inside and Out, a twelve-issue story arc in the monthly series and a two volume set in trade paperback format, is divided in two acts. The Devil in Cell-Block D covers Murdock's time behind bars on Ryker's Island and The Devil Takes a Ride carries him overseas to find out who has destroyed his life and why.

Both parts of the story work as fantastic visual complements to one another, Lark's art being some of the best in comics today. He captures not only the visual oomph of the streets of Portugal, France, and Switzerland as well as he had the closed-in walls of the prison but also manages to impart a sense of how Daredevil, moving through them with radar in lieu of eyesight, is experiencing them. As well, the halves of the story form a stunning examination of the character under extreme duress.

The ethical problems of his double life as attorney and vigilante have been there all along, of course, they simply were not subjected to such minute scrutiny until now. When Daredevil was first created by Stan Lee and Bill Everett way back in 1964, Murdock was simply accepted as one of the good guys. He put criminals behind bars by day as an attorney-at-law and helped corral them by night as a masked vigilante.

But when prisoners in vol. 1 of The Devil, Inside and Out discuss the possibility of verdicts delivered in Murdock's cases being overturned if he is convicted of having been a masked vigilante at the time, it forces to light the fact that the double life Murdock has been leading is, professionally and legally, not simply some obscure gray area. It is, as an attorney like Murdock might say himself, actionable in a court of law.

And when he makes the choices and arrangements necessary to put his own house back in order in vol. 2, it forces readers to view him in a whole new light. This is a man making complex choices and compromises; no longer the devil-may-care swashbuckler with the simple liberty of always doing what's right.

And, as Vanessa Fisk points out while revealing the orchestrations that have brought him to this point and that will continue to haunt and dig at him, his actions and choices are far more selfish than he allows himself to realize.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.