Dead Meadow: Shivering King and Others

Rob Horning

Dead Meadow

Shivering King and Others

Label: Matador
US Release Date: 2003-06-03
UK Release Date: 2003-06-16

Washington, D.C.'s Dead Meadow has already attracted an inordinate amount of attention, probably because they look like Weezer and allegedly aspire to sound like Black Sabbath (though they are more like Iron Butterfly). This incongruity likely promotes speculation about what statement they are trying to make by playing stoner metal without having sleeves of tattoos or cringe-inducing piercings. One might be tempted to declare that they are democratizing the genre, or revealing that the music transcends the appearance of the performers.

But could it be that they are simply cannibalizing a subculture without committing to the fashion codes that would mark them as lifers in the realm of the outcasts? The message would be that hipsters can co-opt anything they choose, and, by doing so, win the eager applause of their like-minded peers in the music press. One might also assume that some intellectual trappings must govern their numbing, relentless repetitiveness, since it stands to reason that anything so initially repellant must be interpreted in terms of goals more elevated than the usual providing of pleasure.

However, it's hard to shake the nagging suspicion that this must have been a very simple album to write: all that's required is a couple of guitar pedals and more than a few gravity bongs, and a willingness to let the tape roll. Adopting the strategies of '60s San Francisco acid-rock bands Quicksilver Messenger Service and the Grateful Dead (their cover art, with its collage style and ersatz-psychedelic design motifs, suggests the connection as well), Dead Meadow makes songs that aren't so much composed as they are discovered -- the random oozing sounds, undulating amorphously and then seeping from the amps like lava, blend organically, their volume and density emphasizing the point that such sounds can't be under the controlling, shaping restraints of their creator. This, then, would be the pretense behind it, and the reward for listeners comes through surrendering to the massiveness rather than searching within it for orchestrated details.

Aside from two short interludes ("Me and the Devil Blues" and "She's Mine"), all the songs are prog rock epics that don't actually progress. Some have acoustic guitars pushed prominently to the front of the mix, defeating their usual gentleness; most have meandering "solos" that don't seem to have any structure at all, but are instead a squall of croaking notes. The tempos are all turgid, with a molasses-like thickness seeming to weigh them down and prevent them from developing momentum. Beyond that,Shivering King and Others consists of plodding, wah-wah saturated dirges that thump along like a post-ironic Melvins, while featuring the most muddied and miserable whine heard anywhere outside a Jandek record. Indeed, the albums of Jandek's crazed electric period, highlighted by the psychopathic Interstellar Discussion and Telegraph Melts, might be considered an influence for "Good Moanin'" and "Heaven", if it weren't so unlikely that Dead Meadow have actually heard them.

Like the tuneless riffing, the bleating vocals seem designed to alienate and obfuscate, making for challenging listening that prevents one from comfortably dismissing their achievement through lackadaisical enjoyment. The lyrics, mostly indecipherable but helpfully reprinted in the CD booklet, deal with cosmic themes, exploring the unfathomable mysteries of life and nature. "I don't know but I believe in the endless surging of the sea" (from "I Love You Too"), "A healthy baby born couldn't stop crying / A man that died softly smiling" (from "Everything's Going On"), "The light never goes dim, It's the state we're in / We'll sink into the sea, just you and me" (from "Raise the Sails") -- these give an indication of their mystical drift, which entirely suits the incomprehensible hugeness of their sound.

This aesthetic -- which privileges size, pain, complexity, obscurity, volume, and the infinite implied by the uniform over pleasure, proportion, smoothness, diminution, and elegance -- has its roots in the 18th century fascination with "the sublime" rather than merely "beautiful." The involuntary passions and terrors inspired by things sublime (a mountain, a ruined castle) were held to be more artistically significant than the dainty, decorous responses to things beautiful (a flower, a chaste woman), as sublime objects turned one's attentions to God's majesty, death's inevitability, and one's own surprising insignificance in the grand scheme of things. By demonstrating an interest in the sublime, an 18th century artist's work took on an uncontestable dignity in a time when growing commercialization made more and more art generic, trivial, and disposable. Perhaps the same can be said of Dead Meadow's interest now.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.