Denison Witmer: Safe Away / Are You a Sleeper?

Reissue of sensitive Philly songster's 2002 debut full-length, served with an extra disc of sincerity.

Denison Witmer

Safe Away / Are You a Sleeper?

Label: The Militia Group
US Release Date: 2006-10-17
UK Release Date: 2006-11-06

Looking back at my review of Denison Witmer's The River Bends and Flows Into the Sea, I was perhaps a tad unnecessarily harsh, surprised as I was by the sweetness and simple charms the album had to offer, not to mention the complete lack of edginess. But since then, Witmer's songs, particularly "22", have refused to give up the modest acreage of my brain where they first set up camp. So I have approached the re-release of Witmer's first full-length, 2002's Safe Away, with appreciative curiosity rather than trepidation, knowing not to expect strings of jaded f-bombs or blasts of unnerving guitar feedback, but rather a well-above-average set of classically constructed songs reminiscent of the '70's heyday of hammer-ons and sensitivity. And that's pretty much what Safe Away turns out to be, like the quiet musings of your kindest friend.

Witmer drew comparisons early on to the late Elliott Smith, but apart from a very slight vocal resemblance, there aren't many similarities, particularly with regards to aesthetics. Produced by the Innocence Mission's Don Peris, Safe Away has just as much sincerity and vulnerability, but is infinitely more well-adjusted. Witmer, at least on this four-year old recording, is also a much more traditional strummer. Compare his "Los Angeles" with Smith's "Angeles" for example. "I remember thinking that someday you'd leave / And praying in your bedroom before I fell asleep", he sings nakedly and with no small amount of remiss, but one gets the sense that whatever sad times Witmer's been through, he pulls himself together by the time he sits down to write. Smith, on the other hand, naturally or by design, always sounded as if he was coming unhinged in the moment. That distinction may have initially caused my resistance to Witmer's songs, which is unfortunate. Safe Away is like a warm, fuzzy blanket, and everyone needs one of those now and again.

"What Will Stay?" is a highlight of the record, with its jangly, half-fingerpicked guitar pattern of alternating bass notes, and Peris's ever-so-slight production touches. "What will stay / When everything is going, what remains?" Witmer sings with gentle confidentiality, then "Am I safe?, am I safe? / When everything is going, I'm afraid". But there's only the most threadbare hint of despair, and we know the answers are, respectively, "Something" and "Yes". Of course, it's never been cool in the non-Top 40 world to turn the other cheek, to use the word "pray" literally, or to declare "I won't leave" when other songwriters would already be three hours down a lonesome highway -- but in the good guy style of James Taylor and buddy Sufjan Stevens, Witmer's warmth is a refreshing change of pace.

Included in the re-release is a second disc, tying together two recent EPs and a couple of bonus tracks. Are You a Sleeper? is a companion to 2005's Are You a Dreamer?, featuring a couple of alternate versions of tunes from that album and some heretofore unreleased songs as well. The exquisitely delicate "Castle and Cathedral" showcases the talents of Rosie Thomas, another artist working the sweet and quiet beat. In a way, it's easier to hear Thomas perform the material, since we're more used to hearing sentimental female voices than male ones. But the acoustic version of "Little Flowers" is just as gorgeous, its keyboard-enhanced chorus among Witmer's best melodies. The second EP is comprised of three live tracks from a Philadelphia performance, backed by the band Saxon Shore. The ambience provided by the band works admirably on the otherwise repetitive hooks of "The '80s" and "Grandma Mary". The live recordings unfortunately sound a little thin and distant, so perhaps that's the reason the tunes come off as slightly lackluster, despite the bigger arrangements. Still, the full-band update on "Los Angeles" suggests, even filtered through the room sound, the more adventurous and textured directions Witmer has taken since Safe Away's initial release, and hopefully will continue to take.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.