Reviews

Dharma & Greg: Season One

Lesley Trites

First aired in 1997, Dharma and Greg is almost old enough to be considered retro, along with songs from the '90s.

Dharma & Greg

Distributor: 20th Century Fox
Cast: Jenna Elfman, Thomas Gibson, Mimi Kennedy, Alan Rachins, Susan Sullivan, Mitchell Ryan
Network: ABC
First date: 1997-09-27
US Release Date: 2006-06-13
Last date: 1998-05-20
Website
Trailer
Amazon
Silly, you don't sleep in the rain. You make love in the rain.

-- Dharma Finkelstein (Jenna Elfman)

First aired in 1997, Dharma and Greg is almost old enough to be considered "retro," along with songs from the '90s. It's also intelligent as far as romantic comedies go, humorous without being stupid. Now released on DVD in an attractive package that includes commentaries for three episodes and an interactive game called "Reaching Your Inner Dharma," Season One establishes the show's use of stereotypes to poke fun at extremes, in this case, conservative and liberal. Both unorthodox and familiar, Dharma and Greg's relationship imagines a romantic-comedic version of middle ground.

In the pilot episode, Dharma Finkelstein (Jenna Elfman) and Greg Montgomery (Thomas Gibson) lock eyes passionately on the San Francisco subway. She gets off and though he tries to follow, he's just a moment too late. Not to worry: soon after, he finds her in his office, where he works as U.S. Attorney, cross-legged on his desk. Her position, both at ease and out of place, as Elfman points out on the commentary track, "sums up" Dharma. A yoga teacher, dog trainer, and free spirit, Dharma tends to challenge the status quo.

The contrast between Dharma's spontaneity and Greg's bureaucratic, upper-class world forms the sitcom's conventional premise: opposites attract. Dharma convinces Greg to join her for pie in Reno, where they marry on their first date. Fortunately, their chemistry is convincing enough that it sustains them through the first season's various "worlds colliding" plots. Greg's first sight of Dharma's parents, Abby (Mimi Kennedy) and Larry (Alan Rachins), constitutes one such episode. She's a painter who likes to work in the nude, her husband is posing as her naked Adam. "The naked woman," Greg tells Dharma, "is your mother." As she's intuited however, Greg's stiffness is not intractable, and he's willing to accept her family's eccentricity.

Dharma has a slightly harder time with Greg's parents. Predictably, Kitty (Susan Sullivan) and Edward Montgomery (Mitchell Ryan) are as rich and conservative as Dharma's folks are free-thinking. Upon their initial meeting, Dharma sets herself to the task of liberating the Montgomerys' minds and improving their relationship ("You know, you guys should try doing it outside!"). In turn, Kitty tries to teach Dharma some social graces, appropriate to the wife of a Montgomery. The tensions become slightly more complicated when Dharma gets a taste of "power" (in the episode titled "Mr. Montgomery Goes to Washington"), and her new age ethics take a beating (at least temporarily).

Essentially unsurprising, this dynamic proves durable (the show ran for five seasons). Its charm stems from the ludicrous situations that pit these different backgrounds and values against each other. In "Invasion of the Buddy Snatcher", Kitty is unable to get rid of ducks that have nested in her backyard pool. She calls Abby, who conveniently has a degree in ornithological intelligence and manages to communicate with the ducks. Eventually Abby and Larry "mate" in the pool to drive the ducks away. Kitty is appalled, but happy to be rid of the ducks.

The jokes often come at the expense of Larry and his burnt-out forgetfulness or Kitty's uptight conservatism. Due to a bad telephone connection, for example, Kitty and Edward assume that Abby and Larry have propositioned them for swinging, reasoning that because Abby and Larry are "hippies," they must be "into" swinging. The show, however, frequently celebrates Abby and Larry's untraditional (they were never married) partnership, as it appears more loving and functional that Edward and Kitty's cold and businesslike marriage.

In the commentary for the pilot episode, Kennedy and Rachins complain that critics didn't write enough about the show's "new ideas," revealed within the context of a romantic relationship ("So it made sense," as Elfman puts it). Dharma & Greg does attempt to explore some of the more "serious" issues facing young couples in the first year of marriage, but these are usually undercut by elaborate displays of the characters' idiosyncrasies.

In "The Ex-Files", Dharma meets Greg's ex and becomes jealous, then sets out on an obsessive quest to find the ex a new partner, going so far as to screen candidates herself. She is like a caricature of a jealous partner, shedding light on what jealousy will push people to do. And In "Much Ado During Nothing", Dharma and Greg worry that their sex life is becoming boring, a typical concern for a young married couple. The show makes the situation unusual, however, in that the catalyst for their worry is that Dharma's best friend Jane (Shae D'Lyn) won the coveted "duck," a prize apparently invented by Dharma and Jane and awarded for having sex in the weirdest place. Dharma and Greg become obsessed with winning back the duck and spice up their sex life in the process.

This becomes the first season's pattern. As the newlyweds learn about one another, they also provide a lens through which to view their social and political circumstances. If Dharma & Greg's basic dynamic is not so new for television marriages (see: I Love Lucy), its charismatic performers and energetic scripts make it seem fresh.

Dharma and Greg: Season One - Living Room Lawn clip

7

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image