Do Our Superheroes Satisfy a Secret Craving for Authoritarianism?

Alex Beringer

Chris Gavaler's On the Origins of Superheroes raises compelling questions about our fascination with men in tights.

On the Origins of Superheroes: From the Big Bang to Action Comics No. 1

Publisher: University of Iowa Press
Author: Chris Gavaler
Publication date: 2015-01

A common truism about superheroes holds that we are looking at gods in spandex. Captain America and Superman, so this argument goes, are like myths insofar as they act as shorthand for cultural values. The PBS documentary Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle features a particularly comforting version of this thinking, reminding us that superheroes are always an ‘innocent mythology’ that ‘uplift[s] us’ and shows ‘us how to be better versions of ourselves’”(cited in Gavaler, 11).

It sounds awfully nice. But one need only think of the influence that Nietzsche’s übermensch simultaneously exerted on Action Comics#1 and Nazi Germany to see the problems that such an uncritical reading of the genre poses. The modern superhero narrative is, in fact, so resonant precisely because it's really a patchwork of other enduring narratives, some admirable and others deeply flawed.

This is the call to arms (or to tights, as the case may be) of Chris Gavaler’s On the Origin of Superheroes. For Gavaler, an English professor at Washington & Lee, the task of decoding superheroes is less about arriving at some definitive conclusion than laying bare their contradictory elements. In exploring these pathways, Gavaler offers a diverse array of influences and trajectories.

From a historical standpoint, Gavaler tends to locate the actual “origins” of superheroes in the late 18th century and traces these strands into the early 20th century. While the book gives no direct rationale for this timeline, it generally tends to suggest that superheroes are a reflection of the diverse strands of secularized thinking and political movements that sprung from the Enlightenment. Among the book’s chapters are discussions that place superheroes in the context of a wide array of developments of this period: the French and American revolutions, Manifest Destiny, Darwin’s theory of evolution, and even Jane Austen’s marriage plots. This way of situating the timeline turns out to be satisfying, as it avoids the fallacy of implying that superheroes are somehow a universal fixture of all cultures and time periods.

Among the most compelling and most troubling of Gavaler’s suggestions is the idea that superheroes satisfy a secret craving for authoritarianism in liberal democratic society. He notes that democratic revolutions tend to serve up a “steady diet of so-called Great Men” who save the common folk from the disorder and ideological fissures involved in actual rule by the people. Oliver Cromwell, George Washington, and Hawthorne’s fictional “Gray Champion” are all charismatic figures who impose a unilaterally defined version of justice and then occupy the cult of personality left in the absence of a king (73).

Batman and Superman share this distinction. They fight authoritarian tyrants but do it in a way that itself seems strikingly authoritarian. As Galaver puts it, Western culture secretly craves the drama of the tyrant and the super villain because it creates the occasion for a “black-and-white world sliced cleanly into righteous good and tyrannical evil… the complex shadings flattened into superheroic poses” (59). At its worst, this sort of moral certitude in the name of democracy can resemble the KKK with their costumes and vigilante justice. Indeed, for superhero fans, one of the more chilling passages in the book should come in the clear line that Gavaler is able to draw between costumed heroes and Thomas Dixon’s white supremacist novels, D.W. Griffith’s Birth of a Nation.

The chapter linking superheroes to Darwin’s theory of evolution is another highlight. From this perspective, superheroes might be seen as modern iterations of Victorian works such as Shelley’s Frankenstein and Stevenson’s Jekyll and Hyde, which find sublime terror in the realization that human nature might be changeable. This evolutionary proto-superhero then contains both the supermen of the future (a term Bernard Shaw used before Nietzsche) and earlier, primal versions of humanity. In this way, Gavaler formulates a way of thinking about superheroes that can account for Superman as “man of tomorrow” as the swath of heroes who gain power by returning to the beast within like Wolverine, Spiderman, or, well, Beast.

Gavaler’s idiosyncratic writing style is likely to be the most divisive element of On the Origin of Superheroes. He's a fiction writer by trade and this is clear from the very first pages. He frequently takes digressions into autobiography, relating stories about himself as a teenager obsessed with superhero comics. Other times, the reader must stay with him through long chains of free association. One minute Gavaler will wax philosophical on his love for pulp fiction and The Mask of Zorro; the next, these reflections take him to Wordsworth or Plato. At its worst, the writing can feel aimless and self-indulgent. At its best, it’s what I would imagine it’s like to sit in one of Gavaler’s classes on superheroes: open-ended conversations that wander into some very surprising corners.

But this meandering schema seems to be partly by design. Throughout the book, Gavaler seems less preoccupied with offering a definitive narrative about the origins of superheroes than providing a starting point for further arguments. Ultimately, this what makes On the Origins of Superheroes rewarding. It models an approach to the problem rather than a definitive answer. “Superhero research isn’t like the Chunnel connecting England and France,” Gavaler tells us. Instead “there are a thousand ways to access Magneto’s cavern, some more idiosyncratic than others” (269).

But for all this talk of diversity, On the Origins of Superheroes feels woefully lacking in discussions of the role of women and people of color within the superhero fantasy. As the popularity of Coates’ Black Panther and Wilson’s Ms. Marvel show, the fantasy of possessing superpowers stretches across all different types of identities. One wonders how this might fit into Gavaler’s sprawling approach.

Alex Beringer is an assistant professor of English at the University of Montevallo where he teaches and writes about 19th century American literature, visual culture, and graphic narratives. His work has appeared in American Literature, Arizona Quarterly, and Studies in American Fiction, among other places.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

Electronic music is one of the broadest-reaching genres by design, and 2017 highlights that as well as any other year on record. These are the 20 best albums.

20. Vitalic - Voyager (Citizen)

Pascal Arbez-Nicolas (a.k.a. Vitalic) made waves in the French Touch electro-house scene with his 2005 debut, OK Cowboy, which had a hard-hitting maximalist sound, but several albums later, Voyager finds him launching into realms beyond at his own speed. The quirky, wallflower vocals and guitar snippets employed throughout Voyager drop a funk that brings to mind WhoMadeWho or Matthew Dear if they had disco-pop injected between their toes. "Levitation" is as pure a slice of dance floor motivation as theoretically possible, a sci-fi gunfight with a cracking house beat sure to please his oldest fans, yet the album-as-form is equally effective in its more contemplative moments, like when Miss Kitten's vocals bring an ethereal dispassion to "Hans Is Driving" to balance out its somber vocoder or the heartfelt cover of "Don't Leave Me Now" by Supertramp. Voyager may infect you with a futuristic form of Saturday Night Fever, but afterwards, it gives you a hearty dose of aural acetaminophen to break it. - Alan Ranta

Keep reading... Show less

Hitchcock, 'Psycho', and '78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene'

Alfred Hitchock and Janet Leigh on the set of Psycho (courtesy of Dogwoof)

"... [Psycho] broke every taboo you could possibly think of, it reinvented the language of film and revolutionised what you could do with a story on a very precise level. It also fundamentally and profoundly changed the ritual of movie going," says 78/52 director, Alexandre O. Philippe.

The title of Alexandre O. Philippe's 78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene (2017) denotes the 78 set-ups and the 52 cuts across a full week of shooting for Psycho's (1960) famous shower scene. Known for The People vs. George Lucas (2010), The Life and Times of Paul the Psychic Octopus (2012) and Doc of the Dead (2014), Philippe's exploration of a singular moment is a conversational one, featuring interviews with Walter Murch, Peter Bogdanovich, Guillermo del Toro, Jamie Lee Curtis, Osgood Perkins, Danny Elfman, Eli Roth, Elijah Wood, Bret Easton Ellis, Karyn Kusama, Neil Marshall, Richard Stanley and Marli Renfro, body double for Janet Leigh.

Keep reading... Show less

The Force, which details the Oakland Police Department's recent reform efforts, is best viewed as a complimentary work to prior Black Lives Matter documentaries, such 2017's Whose Streets? and The Blood Is at the Doorstep.

Peter Nicks' documentary The Force examines the Oakland Police Department's recent reform efforts to curb its history of excessive police force and systemic civil rights violations, which have warranted federal government oversight of the Department since 2003. Although it has its imperfections, The Force stands out for its uniquely equitable treatment of law enforcement as a complex organism necessitating difficult incremental changes.

Keep reading... Show less

Mary Poppins, Mrs. Gamp, Egyptian deities, a Japanese umbrella spirit, and a supporting cast of hundreds of brollies fill Marion Rankine's lively history.

"What can go up a chimney down but can't go down a chimney up?" Marion Rankine begins her wide-ranging survey of the umbrella and its significance with this riddle. It nicely establishes her theme: just as umbrellas undergo, in the everyday use of them, a transformation, so too looking at this familiar, even forgettable object from multiple perspectives transforms our view of it.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.