Reviews

Doctor Who: Planet of Evil

George Tiller

An infinite universe must contain a lot of fun, even when it’s trying to kill you.


Doctor Who

Distributor: BBC Warner
Cast: Tom Baker, Elisabeth Sladen, Ian Marter, David Maloney
Network: BBC
US Release Date: 2008-03-04
Amazon

Doctor Who

Distributor: BBC Warner
Cast: Tom Baker
Network: BBC
US Release Date: 2008-03-04
Amazon

Every once in a while an actor and a role collide and combine to make something truly special. Through some strange chemistry the actor enhances the scripted part, the part enhances the actor, and a filmic icon is formed. Other actors may do a creditable job with the role and the actor may be able to play other roles quite well, but the unique collision is what’s remembered. While this may sometimes be bad news for an actor (just ask Leonard Nemoy or Tim Curry), its always great news for the audience.

This is exactly what happened when Tom Baker began playing Doctor Who. Rarely has a character and an actor meshed so well. Quite a few actors have played the Doctor and done it well, but none came close to Baker’s unique and infectious joy de vive. The time-space continuum is his oyster; he’s got the TARDIS to cruise around in and a pretty girl for company. Life is good and he knows it.

Of course one must get serious when combating deranged scientists that are contaminated with anti-matter, and Daleks are always a bummer. But through it all Baker is smiling at you and its hard not to smile back. An infinite universe must contain a lot of fun, even when it’s trying to kill you. This Doctor has an optimism that’s easy to share.

Only an optimist can happily accept aiming for London and instead winding up 30,000 years in the future on a planet that’s at the edge of the universe. Of course, it’s easy to cope when you have Sarah Jane Smith (Elisabeth Sladen) with you. Sarah Jane and the Doctor receive a distress call and soon discover that they are on the Planet of Evil.

The planet of evil is Zeta Minor, which has been bumping off members of a geological survey team long before the Doctor arrives. The sole survivor is an increasingly mad scientist (Frederick Jaeger) who hopes to use the planet’s anti-matter ores to provide energy for his world. Unfortunately, there’s an irate anti-matter being stomping about that is violently opposed to that idea.

Sarah Jane and the Doctor run afoul of a rescue mission whose members suspect the Doctor of murder. The Doctor likes humans a great deal, but this human crew is so inept that even the Doctors optimism is sorely tested. The bodies rapidly pile up and danger comes from the anti-matter being, the rapidly dwindling rescue party, and the mad scientist that they (sort of) rescue.

It’s a good story, certainly better than most of the stuff flung at hapless viewers by the SciFi channel. The set is surprisingly good for a 1970s BBC production. It’s all discolored, oddly shaped jungle and swamp that lends itself very well to the air of suspense. The main technical problem is the remarkably bad doors, which wind up being amusing and contribute to the suspense. The viewer is literally wondering whether the actors will survive using them.

Surviving bad stage carpentry and anti matter beings is one thing, but Daleks are bad news indeed. Destiny of the Daleks, shows Baker at his best. Traveling with Romana, a fellow Time Lord (Lalla Ward) and K-9, his robot dog, the Doctor winds up on Skaro, the home world of the Daleks! The Doctor doesn’t recognize this at first because he hasn’t been there for a few thousand years.

The Daleks are mining a ruined city using captured humans as slave labor. They are seeking Davros (David Gooderson), the mad scientist who created them. They need his help to conquer a particularly stubborn species, the Movellans, who wear silver dreadlocks and rather attractive tights. The Movellans want to capture the Doctor and blow up Skaro. The Daleks want to exterminate him. The humans want to be freed. It’s a high-pressure situation.

Baker responds with complete aplomb. When he’s pinned by a fallen column during an earthquake he sends Romana to get help, then relaxes by reading a book. Davros declares his intentions to conquer the universe and Baker responds by offering him a jelly baby. Computer control of intergalactic war fleets is shown up by a game of rock, scissors, paper. And nobody is better at dealing with a Dalek on the rampage than the Doctor. Every surprise is welcome, even the unpleasant ones. Destiny of the Daleks is one of the best Doctor Who stories around and is a pleasure to watch. The doors work a lot better here, too.

The BBC put a great extra feature on these DVDs, in which a viewer can watch the old special effects or the new computer-generated ones. It proves beyond a doubt that the least important part of a science fiction show is the special effects. The most important part is the willingness of the audience to suspend disbelief, which Baker encourages with ease.

There’s a very good documentary called Terror Nation about Terry Nation, a writer who, among other achievements, created the Daleks. He also wrote Blake’s 7, one of many screenplays. He’s the only writer that got rich writing for Doctor Who. (Douglas Adams hit the jackpot after his Doctor Who days.) Daleks were a hot property and Nation had the copyright. He even had a few in his garage. So anyone wanting to use Daleks had to negotiate with Terry. Since he preferred to negotiate during champagne lunches, the producers were more than happy to do so.

Both the Planet of Evil and Destiny of the Daleks are very good science fiction shows. The whole series is appealing in its humble premise: humans won’t ever improve much, but with a good heart and a bit of courage, we’ll always muddle through. And of course the Doctor is there to lend a hand.

7

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image