Bob Dylan: Blood on the Tracks

Ronnie D. Lankford, Jr.

In a way, the songs have become part of me, and playing the album more of a rite than a listening experience. I suppose when art reaches the level of Blood on the Tracks, it is religion.

Bob Dylan

Blood on the Tracks

Label: Columbia
US Release Date: 1975-01-17

It was the summer of '89, after my junior year of college, after my girlfriend dumped me, and after I'd sublet an apartment off-campus, that I first listened to Blood on the Tracks. Since I lived alone and didn't have many neighbors, I staid up as late as I wanted, playing guitar and listening to music. I worked for spare change as a bus boy at Bonanza, but the job didn't take up more than 15-20 hours a week. Why a friend, knowing I was an emotional wreck would loan me a copy of Blood on the Tracks is beyond me. I suppose it wasn't as dangerous as a fifth of Jim Beam or a .45 Colt, though songs like "You're Gonna Make Me Lonesome When You Go" did lead me to contemplate jumping from my second story apartment window. While I haven't spoken to the friend since college, and the girl somehow managed to live her life without me, Blood on the Tracks has remained a faithful companion ever since.

I'm not certain why it took me so long to listen to the album. I'd been a Dylan fan for a number of years and knew the album was important, perhaps his best. I was familiar with "Tangled Up in Blue" from the radio and played a rudimentary version of it on my acoustic guitar. Perhaps it was destiny, the stars lining up, or just a whim of the Great Mother that conspired to save the album for a special occasion when I'd be most receptive to it.

The magic thing about Blood on the Tracks is that it's so emotionally raw; this is what makes the album cut so much deeper than Dylan's earlier (and later) albums. On albums like Highway 61 Revisited and Blonde on Blonde, he wrote great songs, lyrics, and melodies, but remained detached. On Blood on the Tracks, he's wearing his tattered heart on his torn shirtsleeve, and he paints a sad, tired tale of a man scraping bottom. Add to this the idea that Dylan is really singing about himself as he desperately tries to hold on to his wife, Sara, and pretty soon you're feeling real sorry for the big lug. Sure, this might not be the real scenario, but when you listen to the music, it sounds pretty damn close.

Blood on the Tracks kicks off with three real downers, slowly miring you into the cheerless world of love gone to hell in a handbasket. "Tangled Up in Blue"'s plot line follows two lovers as they lose and find one another over a period of several lifetimes. The point of view is as screwed up as it is in Shakespeare's sonnets, with Dylan standing outside and inside the story at the same time. While the tale of the two lovers pulls you in, the strangeness -- shifting from loggers in the great North woods to revolutionary France -- keeps you off balance. The sadness thickens in "Simple Twist of Fate", as happenstance -- forgetting to drop a coin in a blind man's cup -- keeps lovers separated, and Dylan's self-pity -- at once condescending, resigned, and filled with pain -- drops to an emotional low in "You're a Big Girl Now".

Just when you're ready to break out a fresh pack of razors and slit your throat, Dylan cuts loose with an angry "Idiot Wind", an epic "fuck you" song blown into cosmic proportions. It's as though he combined "It Ain't Me Babe" with "Desolation Row", and then poured out a spleen full of viciousness he'd been withholding ever since Blonde on Blonde. He spits out: "You hurt the ones that I love best, and cover up the truth with lies / One day you'll be in the ditch, flies buzzin' around your eyes / Blood on your saddle". Sure, he may be a little too pissed off to be objective here, but the song serves as a needed blood letting, cleaning out all the poison.

The emotional ups and downs continue, from bummers like "You're Gonna Make Me Lonesome When You Go" and "If You See Her, Say Hello" to the surprisingly uplifting "Shelter from the Storm". I've never really understood the significance or appeal of "Lily, Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts", but I'd miss it if it wasn't on the album. It's the seventh song and it lasts so long (about nine minutes), that it always surprises me when three more songs appear after it.

Over time, Blood on the Tracks has taken on a religious significance to me. I like to have the CD case lying on the bedside table, just so I can take a peek at it now and then. The lyrics, as they pile up on one another, as one song spills into the next, continue to reveal new tidbits of wisdom; they offer assurance, providing just the right phrase for whatever trial or tribulation I find myself in. In a way, the songs have become part of me, and playing the album more of a rite than a listening experience. I suppose when art reaches the level of Blood on the Tracks, it is religion.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.