Richard Russo's 'Everybody's Fool' Reminds Us That Fortune Comes in Gradations

Only in Russo’s world could we hang as tightly as we do on a belief that misguided fortunes might correct themselves and turn life’s cruelties around.

Everybody's Fool

Publisher: Knopf
Length: 496 pages
Author: Richard Russo
Price: $27.95
Format: Hardcover
Publication date: 2016-05

In the '90s, Richard Russo delivered two virtually unassailable novels. The second of those was Straight Man, a wildly funny tale of an interim chairman in a college English department. It arrived in 1997. The first was 1993’s Nobody’s Fool, a rich, nuanced (and, yes, funny) novel that introduced us to Donald “Sully” Sullivan.

If fiction lovers of that era craved a character, they got more than they bargained for with Sully. He was the kind of character who populates small towns all over America: smarter than many, more troubled than most and, like the town he called home, North Bath, he was waiting for his luck to change. Haunted by a childhood he seemed incapable of fully escaping, he got by, waiting on some rich reward that wasn’t ever going to be as sweet as he’d imagined. Like most people, one guesses, Sully found a way to be happy with what he had to be happy with, temporary though that happiness may be.

The novel was well-received, popular enough that it was adapted for the screen, starring none other than Paul Newman. Russo handled the adaptation and saw his own fortunes rise in the coming years. He wrote several scripts for the screen and picked up a Pulitzer for his 2001 novel, Empire Falls. His novels remained impeccably written, balancing on a fine line between the hilarious and the heartbreaking.

There were some who no doubt wished he’d return to North Bath for a short visit with Sully, a chance to check on the fortunes of the people bound to North Bath. That kind of return can be a death knell for some writers. It conjures images of Nora Desmond in Sunset Boulevard attempting to reconnect with former glories and only accentuating her sad desperation.

It doesn’t have to be that way. Some writers pull off this feat with grace. Although there were doubters and detractors Stephen King’s Doctor Sleep revisited Danny Torrance, a character from King’s early classic The Shining, and succeeded at telling a different story with a familiar character. It was, in short, a different book. So, too, is Everybody’s Fool, a different book from its predecessor even if there are elements of the familiar.

Sully is back this time. Now 70 and living in the house left to him by his former teacher, Miss Peoples, Sully is still full of the same wisecracks that made him a fascinating study in the first book. He’s lessened some of the burdens in his life, including his father’s house, which haunted him so in the 1993 novel. Bath has seen its share of misfortune, to be sure. We’re told that at the start of the novel as we witness the burial of a judge whose “scrotum-shrinking judicial gaze of disapproval” is never far from Raymer’s mind as he casts his thoughts back on a life of under-achievement in a town that seems to produce little else. The houses are sagging, the very ground on which everyone walks doomed, and there are carcinogens in virtually every air molecule. Carl, the contractor, can’t save his business to save his life; Sully’s fortunes may have improved but his health hasn’t; Rub, Sully’s dimwitted friend from the first novel, isn’t a lick smarter than he was in 1984.

But Sully’s not the primary focus of the story. Instead, our gaze is cast toward Douglas Raymer, a bumbling chief of police who’s bent on identifying his late wife’s lover. Armed with a garage door opener he sees as his passe-partout he goes about solving the mystery. Or trying to. He’s driven more by his heart than by his intellect, and as such becomes imprisoned by the logic of his emotions rather than the logic of the world. It leads him to a series of funny (and sometimes darkly funny) episodes.

Only in Russo’s world could we laugh as hard we do at a man digging up a grave, setting a fire, or being struck by lightning. Only in Russo’s world could we hang as tightly as we do on a belief that misguided fortunes might correct themselves at any given moment and turn life’s cruelties around. The pain that Raymer, despite his limitations, feels is real and so the reader follows him on his misguided errand with the hope that he will find relief.

As with Nobody’s Fool, there are cruelties that are inexplicable: the scourges of alcoholism and addiction of unemployment and poverty and the cruelties of age and forgetting are present and unrelenting for those who suffer from them. Domestic violence is a reality of this town as well, and one that leaves a mark on the souls of its residents. This tempers the laughter that the book inspires, providing us with a stark reminder that fortune comes in gradations. There's darkness at the corners and, much more so than in Nobody’s Fool, we are asked to contemplate evil via Roy Purdy, a guy in a black hat if ever there was one.

Purdy’s villainy can be a bit hard to take at times, especially because it so clearly rounds the corner of redemption and, at times, threatens to turn the tone of the novel away from its best qualities. This is one of the major criticisms of Everybody’s Fool, along with Russo’s tendencies toward pedestrian humor in racial matters, particularly Raymer’s relationship with Cherice, an African American woman who also teeters on the verge of caricature. Explored on a slightly more nuanced level it may have deepened our appreciation of the story a little more. There's a tendency here, as in other Russo novels, to race toward a resolution that can leave the reader wanting just a taste more.

Still, those faults are forgivable in the face of a character such as Sully, whose return is as welcome as any character’s in memory. The return trip to Bath is also well worth the time, as it gives the reader a chance to glimpse a world that's familiar both inside and outside the confines of the novel’s covers. It’s an enjoyable read in which the characters stay with us long after the last punctuation mark and long after we’ve closed the book, gazed at the spine and jacket and longed for just one more sentence to carry us along into what comes next for the people of Russo’s rich imagination.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.