!!!: Take Ecstasy With Me/Get Up

Katie Zerwas

Standing on the fringe of a flock of indie rockers who would rather dance than shoe-gaze, the latest experimental single from the always emphatic !!! shows them moving toward two possible futures, both salacious and audacious (oh, yeah, and you can dance to it)!!!"


Take Ecstasy With Me/Get Up

Label: Touch and Go
US Release Date: 2005-06-07
UK Release Date: Available as import

The sudden rise to indie rock stardom of the enigmatic !!! has left audiences and critics alike a bit bemused. Standing on the fringe of a flock of indie rockers who would rather dance than shoe-gaze, neither their love affair with '80s new wave nor their reverence for soul is what listeners find so shocking. Rather, their mystique has mainly on what one might call their image. Adopting an unpronounceable moniker, working and living more or less collectively, and refusing to pose in the ubiquitous and incessantly trendy stance of dour underground coolness for the music press, !!! have nonetheless found a seemingly limitless fan-base that has managed to digest their genre-busting booty shakers under with the more palatable nom de rock "chk, chk chk".

Yet, as punks trading angst and the three-minute thrash for hedonism and the eight-minute jam, it is little wonder they've received as much pooh-poohing from the indie rock elite as they have accolades. Despite the group's inability to fit snuggly into accepted definitions of indie rock, punk, house, or jam, their sophomore album, Louden Up Now launched them into the searing limelight. Gearing up for their follow-up full-length album due out in Spring 2006, !!! have released what they refer to as a sort of practice single allowing them to experiment with new forms before they begin their characteristically spontaneous songwriting process. True to their irreverent sense of humor, the group chose to test their mettle not with failsafe new wave classics, but with two tracks by contemporaries the Magnetic Fields ("Take Ecstasy With Me") and Nate Dogg ("Get Up").

"Take Ecstasy With Me," the first track on the single (or "side A" if one is lucky enough to acquire the 12"), is a lush new wave dance hit infused with sophisticated world music timbres. Strange and eclectic tones cascade over monster beats as washed out vocals drone a hypnotic melody. The mix is sparse with fuzzy guitars keyed to shimmering synths and a techno feel that is dynamic without feeling too much like an acid trip. The song develops in slow and subtle ways, moving with the body's internal rhythms and blood flow, delicately massaging the ear to full blown orgiastic ecstasy. Despite all this activity, the song never loses track of it's most essential element, the beat, urging audiences to bust a move rather than flop along in morbid hippie twirls or show off through self-aggrandizing sing-along. In short, the song is a testament to !!!'s profound commitment to the party ethos.

"Get Up" is less danceable, but a real doozie. If this is a harbinger of things to come, then !!! is on their way to a fusion of funk and raw krautrock inspired noise. The track opens honestly enough with a blistering funk bass line that remains solid throughout the first movement of the track. The E-laced vocals on the A-side are replaced by an articulate low growl that morphs from sexy bravado to a menacing whisper. The song's dirty grind is washed clean with fuzzed out guitars and sparkling synth tones. The neck snapping beat builds to a predictable house crescendo on the first breakdown, but soon disintegrates into a break-neck tempo. Suddenly, the track is a noise-laden behemoth a la Can. The once sexy vocals collapse into screaming chaos and vocal distortions, the beat becomes undanceable, and the aphrodisiac turns into angst-laced venom. The many twists and turns of "Get Up" compose a brilliant, albeit risky, maneuver on the dance floor.

Overall, the single is well-balanced and leaves this critic perched on the edge of her seat, salivating for the full-length album to arrive and burn the rubber off her dancing shoes. Whether !!! is tending toward the aesthetic displayed in the more disco-oriented A-side or the more experimental B-side is a question only the full-length release itself can answer. Either way, this single predicts yet another inscrutable artistic success.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.