Fear of Facebook and technology

In an interview I did a decade ago, composer David Behrman said: "As far as machines being the enemy, I'm convinced that technology is amoral. Whether it's a force for good or evil or neither depends on who is doing what with it and for what reason." I came back to that after I read a Christian Science Monitor article about the power and limits of Facebook.

As you've probably heard by now, Facebook is the social networking site that looks to overtake MySpace in that realm. FB is the tidier, button-down version where you network with old school chums but now is adding new widgets to add the multi-media features that's helped make the scruffier MS such a sensation. I've signed up with both and heard about a lot of great music that I wouldn't have known about otherwise thanks to MS but I have to admit that FB does have some appealing features too. It's look is definitely more staid but I have indeed reconnected with some old buddies from high school and college. Plus added features like iLike let you not only list some of your favorite movies, books and music but you can also find out what your friends on FB enjoy too instantly when you do that. They've also added features like music playlists, song dedications, movie quizzes too. For music nuts like me, you also find out where and when your favorite acts are touring near you (which is a big plus). No wonder they're catching up to MySpace... I still find FB to be a little to anti-septic in its set-up but I'm glad I have it though I wouldn't want to give up using MySpace either.

But back to the article. It notes that FB is indeed gaining momentum in the field but also worries that it's part of a disturbing trend.

"Our personal technologies allow (indeed encourage) us to filter out the things that we find distasteful – television commercials, boring tracks on a CD, political opinions with which we disagree."

That's a great, thoughtful sociological observation but the overall thrust of the article is that FB is another way that we can communicate virtually without having to do it in the real world. And that's where I got to thinking about Behrman's quote again. It's easy to blame and scapegoat technology as ruining our lives. It goes back to the industrial revolution and how new technology was reconfiguring industries and taking jobs away. Also in the 1940's and 1950's, sci-fi books and movies tantalized Americans with stories of robots run amok. Post-war technology was making peoples' lives more convenient but again there were inherent (and sometimes justified) fears that it would and could transform our lives for the worse. That continues to happen today as school-shootings are blamed not just on metal and rap music but also video games. Also, as the CSM article notes, we're physically and maybe emotionally and psychologically less able to deal with other people in the non-virtual world when we're tied up on the Net.

To some extent, that's true. You could be in a cafe or at a park with your laptop as you're reading this now but more likely, you're at home or in your office cubicle. Or are you? I'd be curious to see statistics about how and where people access the Net nowadays. The fact is that with more and more cybercafes and places offering hotspots for Wifi, there's no need to be tied down to home or work to surf the web. Hell, you can do it on your Blackberry or iPhone too, not to mention the many cell phones that have web and mail features now. This means that now more than ever, we can be mobile while still connecting to the Net when and where we want. And rest assured that this trend will continue and flourish.

But going back to Behrman's thoughts again, the CSM article again doesn't address enough about how we use technology. It assumes that we all have a monolithic relationship where we shutter ourselves away, hunched over our computers, cut off from the world. There's nothing there about how the Net helps people connect and not just in a virtual world. Thanks to some of my Net contacts, I've been able to visit people in London, Barcelona, New Orleans, Austin, Berlin, Prague, Amsterdam and other locales where they were kind enough to act as unofficial tour guides. Similarly, I was able to extend the same courtesy when people come to New York. That's thanks to mailing lists, newsgroups and websites. Nothing yet through MySpace or Facebook though thanks to the later, I have someone to visit in San Francisco now.

It's right to point out that virtual networking can and does distract from the non-virtual kind but I wish that articles which like to point that out (and which obviously follow in this tradition of technophobia) also point out that it doesn't always turn all of us into shut-in home bodies all the time.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.