Fyre Festival Is an Argument for Higher Taxes -- on the Rich

Photo: Courtesy of Bahamas Ministry of Tourism / Fyre Festival

Every day elite policymakers throughout America make the same arrogant blunders as the Fyre Festival organizers did, and their mistakes can be seen in a drive through most inner cities.

The luxury music-art festival known as Fyre Festival self-destructed last weekend, with the world watching. Victim of its own ambition and lack of planning, the disaster has titillated and delighted the world, which has interpreted it as a sort of comeuppance for the one percent.

Fyre Festival has been described as many things: as surprise, as disaster, as “Lord of the Flies dystopia meets social media hysteria” (as Vanity Fair put it).

However, there ought to have been nothing surprising or unusual about Fyre Festival (besides the fact that it seemed poised to make Blink-182 cool again). Fyre Festival was a most predictable culmination of contemporary capitalism: a suavely presented pitch that promised everything and provided nothing.

Indeed, it's the perfect expression of contemporary capitalism. The organizers felt they would strike out on their own, do something new, with merely a load of cash and a vision. They substituted the contemporary values of swaggering confidence, social capital, wealthy friends and big talk for the traditional values of experience, ability, and wisdom. For a brief instant before its self-destruction, Fyre Festival generated social media buzz and followers, attracted by the novelty of something that might turn out to be the promise of the next big thing (sort of like a live-action Google Buzz). What’s more, with merely a few big names and some sleek advertising, they convinced hundreds to follow them.

It’s worthwhile exploring the stupidity of those who attended because it says something important about those with money and status in today’s world. Attendees clearly did little research, or if they did, they didn’t care that the event had no history, that the organizers had no experience, or that there didn’t seem to be any infrastructure to back up the superficial claims of the advertisers. They bought on, confident that money and confidence could make the improbable happen. The difficult material reality of building a luxury festival site from scratch? Insignificant next to the immaterial combination of vision and credit.

The attendees trusted in the combination of vision, big names and big money to produce a worthwhile experience that matched their expectations. They are the epitome of today’s policy-makers: easily sold by a glitzy vision backed by capital, even when there's no wisdom or experience behind the vision, and even when that vision seems to directly contradict the wisdom of experience. More eager to be seen doing something new than to be trusted to hold the tried and true course, Fyre Festival capitalists leap onto bandwagons just in case it (and they) turned out to be the Next Big Thing.

But by doing so, they draw capital away from the things in society that are real and substantive and meaningful. How many schools could have been funded by the money wasted in a Fyre Festival that didn’t even happen? In its own way, Fyre Festival is an argument for higher taxes. Amid crumbling schools and hospitals that are afraid to ask for a cent more in public funding, Fyre Festival capitalists are so desperate for things to spend their loose change on that they shower it on half-baked ideas without any serious thought about the follow-through.

Fyre Festival underscores what happens when society centralizes the unrestrained right of the rich and wealthy to accumulate their wealth and be as foolish as they want with it. Fyre Festival capitalists operate in sound bites and social media ads, not evidence-based decision-making. Fyre Festival capitalists are Ronald Reagan, iconoclastically declaring that “Government is the problem!” They are Margaret “there-is-no-such-thing-as-society” Thatcher. They are Donald Trump, defiantly proclaiming “We will build a wall!”

“Let’s just do it and be legends, man!”

Fyre Festival is more than just a beachfront wasteland in the Bahamas. It’s the wasteland of contemporary capitalism, strewn with the abandoned commitments and broken promises of bankers and the wealthy. It’s privatized public services, Charter schools, subprime mortgages, income-contingent student loans and public / private partnerships: all of them the glitzy produce of money and big names, all of them promising the world (better / bigger / more enjoyable than ever before!) and all of them failing to meet the expectations and needs of those who buy into them.

Fyre Festival is not an exceptional case. It is the natural byproduct of a society that fails to temper show with substance; vision with materialism.

Fyre Festival organizers thought they could snap their fingers and build a village from scratch. Instead, they created a disaster. Elite policymakers throughout America make the same arrogant blunders every day, and their mistakes can be seen in a drive through most inner cities.

Fyre Festival capitalism exposes not just the stark divide between rich and poor (in a society where luxury music festivals can actually be a viable idea), it also exposes the starkly different impacts of inequality on these two groups. Who are the victims of Fyre Festival capitalism? The truly wealthy -- the one percent -- who attended the festival were able to jet away, or seek refuge in their own always ready nearby cabanas and laugh off the experience. The somewhat-less-wealthy were rescued by the struggling public services of a developing Caribbean nation, who rushed in when they learned of the disaster to try and help mitigate some of the harm.

When Fyre Festival capitalism descends on inner-city suburbs, or rural counties, it produces the same outcomes. The wealthy laugh and shrug off their failed experiment, the upper-middle-class are rescued by the establishment at some minor inconvenience to themselves, but the poor are left to clean up the mess. Whether that mess is the half-constructed wasteland of the Fyre Festival site, left to be cleaned up by the Bahaman government, or the ruined schools of the urban inner-city, Fyre Festival capitalism leaves its most vicious footprint on the backs of the poor, while it is the wealthy who scream and demand media’s acknowledgement of their suffering.

Fyre Festival capitalism produces the million-dollar consultant who bemoans a slight tax hike and speaks to the media about his lack of freedom and his suffering; while the spectator on the street remains homeless because tax brackets are inadequate to fund public housing. Yet it is the oppressed million-dollar white consultant who will command the media’s attention, not the homeless black man dying on the street.

Fyre Festival caught the world’s attention, mostly thanks to the gleeful mirth of a population that earnestly desires to see the suffering of the rich and powerful. It should be taken as a warning by the rich and powerful whenever the desire for justice is replaced by the desire for vengeance -- and the public that watched the Fyre Festival fiasco was a vengeful public, delighted by the spectacle of powerful and rich people suffering. As a public, we were a narrow step away from that other public that watched and cheered as the rich and powerful were marched to the French guillotine in 1793, and many times since then. In the social media storm that weekend, we saw the glint of the guillotine and felt its deadly breath on our cheeks. And we loved it.

If Billy McFarland, Ja Rule and their class are upset, it's because Fyre Festival exposed the stupidity and cupidity of their class in a way that left them feeling unexpectedly exposed. It revealed a stark naked truth that they -- and even we -- had all thought well layered in comfortable and concealing clothes. Someone had the audacity to tell the emperor he had nothing on. And they did it on social media, with the whole world watching, no less.

Fyre Festival caught the world’s attention, but it should have surprised no one. It's the natural fulfillment of contemporary capitalism: an inevitable disaster spurred on by sleek showmanship, swaggering confidence, carefree capital, and the epic words “Let’s just do it and be legends, man.”

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.