genesis-p-orridge-groupthink

Nik Stanbridge Psychic TV, Riverside. 1982. (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0BY-NC-ND 2.0 / cropped)

Groupthink and Other Painful Reflections on ​Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth

TOPY and Genesis P-Orridge’s knowing adoption of cult iconography quickly slid from satiric emulation to full embrace — and we all went along with it.

Conclusion

P-Orridge and the TOPY leadership have been pursuing three specific tactics to distract, dodge, and deflect the allegations of coercion and abuse that have hounded them for decades. But their uncommon success thus far is due, in no small part, to how they leveraged the structural problems already permeating industry, media, criticism, and fandom circles. They closed all the right loops, in just the right ways, to preclude the conditions required for any explicit call-out of their exploitative behavior, while simultaneously enabling their current exaltation.

An ironic sadness permeates this story. TOPY began with so much promise, yet the almost poetic betrayal of its founding principles is worth an essay all its own. Similarly, time and time again, P-Orridge professed a lifelong mission to, in the parlance of Burroughs, “smash the control machines”. But by Thee Temple’s formal conclusion, s/he evidently never so much detested control as was utterly captivated by it; h/er public statements plainly belied what lurked behind the veil in h/er personal life.

The tragedy of TOPY no doubt mirrored the larger failings of the 1980s occult counterculture revival, including its lofty promises to participants. As a disenchanted David Tibet later declared, “chaos magick [is] a lot of shit … if all these magicians are so great and powerful, why are they all so broke and don’t have girlfriends?” (Keenan 2016: 305). David Keenan himself mused, in a more somber tone, about how “I’ve yet to meet a self-described practicing magician who was able to secure even [their] own most basic happiness” (Keenan 2016: 429). There is a truly lamentable aspect of Thee Temple’s arc that warrants our pity as well.

I think there is a final dimension of this predicament to consider—one with far more to say about us, than about anything P-Orridge and h/er coterie did or did not do. Namely: TOPY is protected from any kind of serious call-out because we’re already in too deep as a music community, and we stand to lose too much if we cut P-Orridge and Thee Temple’s narrative legacy adrift. I say this because the seismic impact of a call-out campaign disrupts not just abuser privileges, and not just apologist indignation.

It also unsettles an amorphous and insidious power dynamic: a scene’s unspoken groupthink, invested in protecting the sacred cows and hallowed stories that echo back the shared beliefs, identifiers, and bonds of the subculture itself. Among dark or extreme music aficionados, this is the fictive glue explaining why we are all in this dark, dank venue together, drinking overpriced beer with a rotating cast of patches and pins on our battle jackets. Invariably, these origin myths coalesce around (or are drummed up by) one or several artistic figureheads, whose compelling biography, astounding feats of stagecraft, or creative gifts from realms beyond our ken, jumpstart the scene and inscribe how it unfurls.

When our figureheads are sometimes toppled by allegations of abuse, the legends about the scene itself—wound up in the brand of the now-smashed idol(s)—fragments as well. Indeed, these accusations set in motion an additional set of dire questions: how did we submissively buy into the mythic posturing, the cult of personality, or the glamorous shock and awe? And how does a scene take that sobering look in the mirror, begin to put the pieces back together, and trudge forward?

The threat of painful reflections like these forestall any honest re-appraisal of TOPY and P-Orridge’s four-decade legacy. Too many of our counterculture through-lines, we imagine, are wrapped around the axle of P-Orridge and h/er ilk. To defer any candid soul searching, our only option, we think, is to keep gunning forward, breaking point be damned. This, more than any other reason named thus far, is ultimately why we’re paralyzed with respect to TOPY and P-Orridge. It’s not that we fear what may happen to them; rather, we fear what we stand to sacrifice, we fear squandering the sunk costs in our own scene’s narratives, to which we’re helplessly wedded. Doing so would dredge up a slew of other embarrassments to ponder.

Why have so many scene impresarios and artist-activists—while demanding exploitation’s removal, root and branch—abetted the consecration of a cult and its guru? Why did said cult, despite its documented abuses, enjoy complete deference in the public square when it winked at its audience and professed to be playacting? And finally, what should an honest reckoning look like in 2019? How can our present values be applied to redress this unsettled legacy, since for TOPY and P-Orridge, a final verdict on their legacies is really all that still hangs in the balance?

These must all be contended with, but only through the public conversations that hopefully come soon. And here, I argue, is the point of departure for any deliberate reform of subculture politics that accounts for concerns of collective memory, accountability, and alternative space preservation.

Long defanged, TOPY and P-Orridge can’t harm anyone else right now. But there are still significant stakes for how we, as music lovers valuing restorative justice, choose to tell their story 28 years later; our choices here either reaffirm or break faith with those ethics. If transgressive yet conscientious artists, critics, and fans are serious about redressing the abuses that were previously tolerated in counterculture spaces, then we must be willing to re-examine the aspects of our scene which have calcified and taken on mythic status.

The tastemakers who fawn over P-Orridge and TOPY by regurgitating uncritical discourse should carefully reflect on the implications of doing so, given the sheer volume of sources documenting career-long coercion and exploitation. Their careless praise exemplifies just how much effort is still required to think through oppressive behavior in scenes beyond the single, sensational call-outs that have become weekly occurrences, and to apply the insights of anti-abuse activism to both our informal fan-feelings and historical assessments of past legacies. If we avert our eyes from staring down evidence and rendering a judgment because of how deeply it cuts, then the entire project of musical subculture may be more harmful than empowering. I am still convinced that the work of reform can be done.

* * *

Note: Genesis Breyer P-Orridge’s preferred pronouns are we, s/he, and h/er to reflect their pandrogyne gender identity, but many quotes herein use masculine pronouns to refer to P-Orridge if the speaker’s statement and/or historical events occurred before the Pandrogyne Project’s start in 1993.

Works Cited

Armstrong, Aimee. “The Strange World Of… Current 93″, The Quietus, 16 October 2018

Beckett, Andy. “Accelerationism: how a fringe philosophy predicted the future we live in”, The Guardian, 11 May 2017

Bever, Lindsey. “‘We won’t stop fighting‘: Parents use billboard to reach children inside Church of Scientology”, Washington Post, 11 April 2016

Blistein, Jon. “Marilyn Manson Splits With Twiggy Ramirez After Rape Allegations“, Rolling Stone, 25 October 2017

Brazier, Lottie. “Genesis P-Orridge: fantastic transgressor or sadistic aggressor?”, The Guardian, 10 December 2018

Brown, Mick. “Trip of a lifetime: Ken Kesey, LSD, the Merry Pranksters and the birth of psychedelia”, Telegraph, 2 November 2016

Cashdan, Marina “The Idea Machine: Brion Gysin”, White Review, February 2011

Conroy, J Oliver. “An apocalyptic cult, 900 dead: remembering the Jonestown massacre, 40 years on”, The Guardian, 17 November 2018

Corcoran, Nina. “Moving on After Brand New“, Noisey, 27 January 2018

Cuzner, Russell “Serious Listeners: The Strange And Frightening World Of Coil”, The Quietus, 24 November 2011.

DeRogatis, Jim. “They’ve Got Him!”: The Emotional Scene at the R. Kelly Hearings”, The New Yorker, 24 Feb 2019

Dillon, Nancy. “Famed jazz saxophonist countersued by former protégé who says he sexually harassed her”, New York Daily News, 14 November 2018

Eisinger, Dale. “Genesis P-Orridge Talks Psychic TV, Brian Jones, How New York Has Changed, and More”, Spin, 13 July 2017

Fanni Tutti, C. Art Sex Music London, Faber & Faber Social, 2017

The Fetish for Shit“, Abstract, 1984

Ford, S. Wreckers of Civilisation: The Story of COUM Transmissions and Throbbing Gristle, London, Black Dog Publishing, 2018

Gilbert, Sophie. “The Real Cult of Charles Manson“, The Atlantic, 20 November 2017

Hagen, Olav. “Lusts Dark Exit“, Electric Dark Space, 1991

Hajdu, David. “Listening to Michael Jackson Will Never Be the Same“, The Nation, 22 March 2019

Hogan, Marc and Strauss, Matthew. “Swans’ Michael Gira Issues Statement on Rape Accusations, Larkin Grimm Responds”, Pitchfork, 27 February 2016

Jackson, Johni. “The Wisdom of Counterculture Icon Genesis P-Orridge“, Paper Magazine, 4 December 2017

Keenan, D. 2016. England’s Hidden Reverse (London, Strange Attractor Press)

Kreps, Daniel. “Ryan Adams Accused of Sexual Misconduct, Emotional Abuse by Seven Women“, Rolling Stone, 13 February 2019

Laden, Tanja M. “Meet the Pandrogyne: The Ballad of Genesis and Lady Jaye”, HuffPost, 12 March 2012

Leland, John. “Genesis P-Orridge Has Always Been a Provocateur of the Body. Now She’s at Its Mercy”, New York Times 9 November 2018

Louv, Jason. “William S. Burroughs’ 7 Occult Techniques for Smashing Reality“, Ultraculture

Michael Love, Michael. “Genesis P-Orridge: Stormtrooper of the Future” Paper Magazine, 29 March 2019

Metzger, Richard. “Genesis Breyer P-Orridge: Thee Psychick Bible”, Dangerous Minds(video)

Midgette, Anne and Mcglone, Peggy. “Assaults in dressing rooms. Groping during lessons. Classical musicians reveal a profession rife with harassment.” Washington Post, 26 July 2018

Midkiff, Sarah. “How Cults Make Money“, Refinery 29, 24 August 2018

Minsker, Evan. “Psychic TV History Chronicled in Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth Documentary“, Pitchfork, 4 October 2016

Opstrup, Kasper. “The Way Out. Invisible Insurrections and Radical Imaginaries in the UK Underground 1961-1991″, Minor Compositions, 21 July 2017

Pangburn, DJ. “Try To Altar Everything: Genesis Breyer P-Orridge At The Rubin Museum”, The Quietus, 9 April 2016

Pilkington, Mark. “Sounds of Blakeness“, Fortean Times, 2001

P-Orridge, G. 2010a. “A TOPY Alphabet ov Desire/Rise” in Thee Psychick Bible, ed. J. Louv (Port Townsend, Feral House), pp. 95-9

P-Orridge, G. 2010b. “Addenda to the Second Edition of Thee Psychick Bible” in Thee Psychick Bible, ed. J. Louv (Port Townsend, Feral House), pp. 465-9

P-Orridge, G. 2010c. “Thee Process is Thee Produkt” in Thee Psychick Bible, ed. J. Louv (Port Townsend, Feral House), pp. 401-30

P-Orridge, G. 2010d. “Know-This: ‘Thee Frequency ov Truth'” in Thee Psychick Bible, ed. J. Louv (Port Townsend, Feral House), pp. 506-23

Pursley, Mike. “Interpretations of Genesis: An Interview with Genesis Breyer P-Orridge”, PopMatters, 8 November 2017

Simkins, Alice “A punk retelling of the modern witch trial: The first ever film about Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth”, Hero, 15 October 2016

Reed, S.A. 2013. Assimilate (New York, Oxford University Press), pp. 185-205

Rodrigo. “The Process Church of the Final Judgment“, Cult Nation, 25 August 2016

Rollmann, Hans. “On ‘Art Sex Music’ and Working as an Avant-Garde Artist with Genesis P-Orridge“, PopMatters, 20 July 2017

Romano, Aja. “The history of Satanic Panic in the US — and why it’s not over yet”, Vox, 30 October 2016

Ross, Rick. “Watch out for tell-tale signs“, The Guardian, 27 May 2009

Russonello, Giovanni. “Women Fighting Sexism in Jazz Have a Voice. And Now, a Code of Conduct.”, New York Times, 30 April 2018

Siepmann, Dan. “Acid Testing the Revival of Psychic TV and Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth”, PopMatters, 29 January 2019

Siepmann, Dan. “Strange Vistas from the Occultism of Coil and Psychic TV“, PopMatters, 25 March 2019

Skolnik, Jess. “The Ugly Truths of Loving the Fall’s Mark E. Smith“, Pitchfork, 26 January 2018

Snapes, Laura. “Alice Glass on leaving Crystal Castles: ‘The cruelty never ceases to amaze me'”, The Guardian, 15 June 2018

Stubbs, David. “Throbbing Gristle: The Second Coming”, The Wire, Issue 281, July 2007

Sturges, Fiona “Art Sex Music by Cosey Fanni Tutti review – elder stateswoman of the avant garde”, The Guardian, 20 March 2017

TOPY. 2010. “A Personal Message from Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth” in Thee Psychick Bible, ed. J. Louv (Port Townsend, Feral House), pp. 33-4

Tutti, Cosey Fanni. “‘I smeared Gen in flour paste and whipped him hard‘: an extract from Cosey Fanni Tutti’s book”. The Guardian, 14 March 2017 Vitimus, Andrieh. “Chaos Magic: The Misunderstood Path”, llewellyn, 12 January 2009

unknown. Coil, Brainwashed, 1984

unknown. “Frequently Asked Questions“, Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth

unknown. “Lust’s Dark Exit“, Electric Dark Space, 1991

unknown. “To Libertines“, AbrAhAdAbrA issue #1, January 1985

FROM YOUR SITE ARTICLES
RELATED ARTICLES AROUND THE WEB
PopMatters