Reviews

The Golden Girls: The Complete First Season

Nikki Tranter

Their advice -- dished out to each other or the seemingly endless numbers of relatives and friends -- reveals dignity and shrewdness.


The Golden Girls

Cast: Beatrice Arthur, Rue McClanahan, Betty White, Estelle Getty
Subtitle: The Complete First Season
Network: Touchstone
First date: 1985
US Release Date: 2004-11-23
Last date: 1986
Amazon

In a recent New York Times article, The Golden Girls creator Susan Harris said she "just always preferred to write about older people. They have stories to tell, and the young ones don't" ("Comedy's Golden Training Ground," 2 January 2005). While Harris has written and produced more than her share of sitcom classics (Soap, Benson, Empty Nest), it's easy to disagree with her on this one. The Golden Girls is not about "older people," but about all of us.

Featuring a quartet of indelible women characters in a Miami share house in the mid-1980s -- forthright New Yorker Dorothy (Beatrice Arthur), Southern belle Blanche (Rue McClanahan), dopey Midwesterner Rose (Betty White) and Dorothy's sassy Italian mom, Sophia (Estelle Getty) -- the series addresses multiple issues. During the first season, just out on DVD, only a few episodes focus specifically on older women's concerns. That said, these episodes are absolutely the season's most affecting, going for drama over comedy as they develop the four leads well beyond the limits of most sitcom "types" and underlining the series' "universal" appeals.

Consider Rose's troubles in the episode, "Job Hunting." Unable to find work, she experiences a real fear that, at 55, she may in fact be useless in the fast-paced 1980s. If her concern that she'll be unable to support herself into old age is age-specific, her basic desire to find decent and challenging work isn't. In "Second Motherhood," Blanche chooses to end a relationship with a father of two young children, because she feels that now, at her age, she should be living for herself, not raising children. Again, this is a situation hardly unique to older women. The series, too, often makes a point of challenging age barriers, with 80-year-old Sophia at times finding herself in similar situations -- anxious about men, feeling trapped by the limits of her age -- as Dorothy, who is 20-some years younger.

So many of these early episodes feature funny (if slightly familiar) and often poignant plots: in "Adult Education," Blanche's morality is tested when a teacher (Jerry Hardin) hits on her, promising good grades in exchange for sex. In "That Was No Lady," Dorothy is tested when a man with whom she falls deeply in love (Glen, played by Alex Rocco) turns out to be married. And then in "The Triangle," Dorothy's hot new doctor boyfriend, Elliott (Peter Hansen), makes a pass at Blanche. Each of these episodes is handled reasonably predictably with everyone hugging before the end credits -- but it's what happens before the hug that makes the show remarkable.

In the "The Triangle," Blanche's revelation that Elliott is a snake ends with Dorothy labeling her friend self-centered and amoral. The tension during Dorothy's jealousy-induced rage is unexpected and uncomfortable: "You could never be a real friend to another woman," she tells Blanche, "You know why? Because you're a slut." Such misunderstanding between friends is typical for a sitcom, but the drama here -- in Winifred Henry's excellent script and magnificent performances by Arthur and McClanahan, is unexpected and uncomfortable. Of course, the truth comes out, apologies are exchanged and normalcy is restored, but not without the viewer getting a peek beneath their usual, comedic relationship.

With The Golden Girls, it's all about authority. Whereas sitcom women of the era were more often than not standard wives and mothers (or, in a frightening number of cases, maids), these "girls" bring a bit of everything to the table. They're wives, ex-wives, daughters, mothers, and aunts, and as such have specific, wise views on womanhood. Though they make common mistakes, they are also experts at life. When Dorothy lectures conservative Rose on her decision to keep seeing married Glen, in "That Was No Lady," she's speaking from her own experience with lasting pain. Dorothy's usually strong demeanor lapses in this episode, and she goes against her better judgment out of a need to escape her depression over her husband's leaving her for a younger woman after 38 years of marriage (Rose and Blanche are both widows). When Rose criticizes her for even considering carrying on the relationship, Dorothy tells her: "I tried to do the right thing, but the right thing was not for me."

It's in this moment, too, that Blanche reveals her own understanding of Dorothy's decision. She asserts, "[I'm] not passing judgment. Rose, sometimes life doesn't work out the way we'd like it to. Sometimes we have to grab our happiness where we can get it." Suddenly, the laughter is over and viewers are reminded that though the women come across as independent and even stubborn, most everything they do is based on this idea, that they understand regret as well as joy. They are not always sprightly as they enter old age, but they're steadfastly making sure they do whatever they can to hold on to what they've got -- especially their friendships with each other.

Their sense of loss and desire speaks to Harris' point about the particular "stories" older women can tell. It's not that Blanche, Dorothy, Rose, and Sophia have experiences that are more interesting than those of younger women. It's that their perspectives are different. Their advice -- dished out to each other or the seemingly endless numbers of relatives and friends parading through their home in this first season -- reveals dignity and shrewdness. They've still got a lot to learn, but as Sophia mocks Dorothy, "You kids. You reach middle age and you think you know everything." Well, almost everything.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image