Harold Melvin and the Blue Notes: To Be True (Expanded Edition)

Stone-cold Philly Soul classic gets the reissue treatment, complete with bonus tracks and thorough liner notes.

Harold Melvin and the Blue Notes

To Be True (Expanded Edition)

Label: BBR
US Release Date: 2016-02-12
UK Release Date: 2016-02-05

By the time they released 1975’s To Be True, Harold Melvin and the Blue Notes were riding high on the success of the Philadelphia soul explosion ushered in by their producers, Kenny Gamble and Leon Huff. Their third release in as many years and one of two released in 1975, To Be True found the group furthering their highly emotive brand of smooth soul to great effect, while also becoming poised as a launching pad for one of the genre’s most iconic voices in Teddy Pendergrass. It’s no coincidence that he is not only front and center on the album, but also listed on the marquee as being a featured member of the group. Within a year, he would be on his own, set to record and release a string of his own chart-topping releases.

But in 1975, Pendergrass was still very much a member of Harold Melvin and the Blue Notes and To Be True is all the better for this. With Gamble and Huff behind the boards, the MFSB players providing instrumental backing and the group assembled to record at the legendary Sigma Sound Studios in Philadelphia, the pair’s golden touch continued to thrive as three of the album’s singles headed into the upper reaches of the R&B charts. “Hope That We Can Be Together Soon”, a Gamble and Huff original, proved the album’s biggest hit, reaching number one on the R&B charts. A smooth soul ballad of the highest order, “Hope That We Can Be Together Soon” was notable also for the presence of Sharon Paige’s velvety smooth vocals paired with Melvin’s grittier baritone, not to mention it being one of the few tracks on the album not to feature Pendergrass on lead vocals.

And while the group was still ostensibly just that, To Be True was the first time rising star Teddy Pendergrass received co-billing, the album being credited to "Harold Melvin and the Blue Notes featuring Theodore Pendergrass". Only 24 years old at the time, Pendergrass was nearly as old as the group itself, it having entered its 21st year of recording and performing in 1975, and his presence arguably signaled the pinnacle of the group’s success and scope of influence. Opening with an impassioned blast of uptempo soul in “Where Are All My Friends", Pendergrass finds himself front and center, clearly becoming the star of the show and proving his worth with each lead.

Relying more on the iconic Philly soul smooth ballad than uptempo R&B numbers, To Be True could well be viewed as the prototypical Gamble/Huff release both in terms of the overall sound and the album’s thematic content. Sharing compositional duties with Gene McFadden and John Whitehead, Gamble & Huff turned in a trio of stone cold smooth soul classics in the searching title cut, “Hope That We Can Get Together Soon” and the heartbreakingly gorgeous ballad “Somewhere Down the Line”. The latter features gloriously smooth harmonies throughout, something largely lacking from the remainder of the album which seemed to serve more as a feature for Pendergrass’ soon-to-be iconic impassioned take on bedroom soul.

Now, some 40 years later, To Be True (Expanded Edition) tacks on a handful of singles edits and alternate mixes. This has long been a tried and true approach in the reissue market and, in general, provides a mildly pleasant addition to an already stellar release. To Be True is no exception. The bonus tracks are of a piece with the album tracks and add little to the overall narrative, but the liner notes help shed light on the atmosphere in which the album was conceived and recorded. And for those who already own the album, this will be the real draw. Everyone else would be well suited to check it out for the original album itself, one of the definitive statements in Philly Soul and a nearly unimpeachable classic in every way.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.