Everything I Need to Know About Being Black I Learned From Kenny Rogers

Mark Harris

For PopMatters TV/Film Columnist Mark Harris, being a minority in a majority world created an ironic, lifelong battle against being force-fed at the teat of popular culture.

Coming of age in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia, it became clear to me -- and to those around me -- that I was black. There's no quicker place to clear up your racial ambiguity than Appalachia. Not that I was the victim of a racist, flaming bag of poo or anything like that. The struggle of being a minority is subtler. It's the everyday grind of keeping up with two cultures, our own and that of the prevailing white world.

White people don't know how good they have it. Sure, there's the whole master race thing, but what they overlook is the privilege of "cultural leisure". As a black man, for every Vibe I read, I have to buy a Rolling Stone; for every Spike Lee joint I see, I have to watch a Michael Bay turd. Too much BET, and I'll fall behind on my MTV. And if I do, I'm labeled culturally retarded: "You've never seen The O.C?!" Yet the fact that I've memorized Pookie the Crackhead's dialogue from New Jack City is somehow meaningless. Why are black people always late? Because we're reading Cosmo.

I had my moment of discovery in the fourth grade. As a reward for learning the dreaded "Mary Had a Little Lamb"/"London Bridge Is Falling Down" medley on the recorder, my music teacher let the class bring in one -- and only one -- pop record to play aloud; sort of our own abbreviated, inbred version of American Bandstand. I couldn't wait to enlighten those clodhoppers with the hippest 45 of the day, "Let's Hear It for the Boy" by Deniece Williams. But Chad Crawley, with his beach boy-blonde mullet-cum-rat tail, brought a rival song, "Islands in the Stream" by Kenny Rogers and Dolly Parton. It was put up to a vote. In hindsight, my defeat now seems less surprising than how secure Chad and I were in our masculinity. The vote made one other thing clear: majority rules, and minority drools. My lifelong battle against being force-fed at the teat of popular culture had begun.

Thanks to my parents' unnerving addiction to Paul Harvey, I was able to avoid listening to the radio for most of my adolescence, but my resistance to TV and movies was, as they say, futile. Over the years, the visual arts have introduced me to people and things I have no interest in, from The English Patient and Sanka to Night Ranger and Harper Valley PTA. Although I've never seen it, I know who wins each season of The Bachelor. It ain't the black guy. I've grown out of hip-hop videos, but now that white America has discovered them, I need to stay relevant. Damn your hipness! Say what you will about the horrors of being a minority, but knowing the names of the Mandrell Sisters without even trying justifies reparations. I feel like the black character in every horror movie who has a bad feeling but "goes along with the group", only to end up in some monster's stool sample.

So, how do we abolish this cultural slavery? Our goal must be a new, race-less national aesthetic. Our homogenized, generic culture must be easy to maintain in order to pass it on to our lazy, ungrateful offspring (punk kids). We'll sing color-blind, public domain tunes like "Happy Birthday", "Chopsticks", and the Windows start-up chime. We'll entertain ourselves with shadow puppets, paper football, and tickle fights. And we'll wear frocks. Now, I can hear white people asking, "But what's in it for us?" How 'bout a little thing called "brownie points"? That, and reduced odds of getting shanked.

I'm not blaming anyone for the situation -- except maybe 4th graders who spell culture with a "k". As a wise man (I think it was G.I. Joe) once said, "Knowing is half the battle." Now that you know, it's time for action. Let's come together like drunken frat brothers who explore their sexual curiosity then vow to never speak of it again. After all, islands in the stream: that is what we are. No one in between. How can we be wrong? Sail away with me to another world. And we'll rely on each other. Uh-huh. Making love with each other. Uh-huh.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.