Hellfire Sermons: Hymns: Ancient and Modern

Jason MacNeil

Hellfire Sermons

Hymns: Ancient and Modern

Label: The Bus Stop Label
US Release Date: 2002-11-15
UK Release Date: 2002-11-15

Prior to the Manic Street Preachers rise to the British rock elite, there was a band that many believed would eventually become what the Manics are today. A few clippings and rave reviews in mags such as NME and Melody Maker ensued, including "as raw and bloody as 1992 gets". But, as is so often the case, the group was a commercial blip. Although they are still together and do gigs in and around their stomping grounds, the Hellfire Sermons will have to be content with a series of undervalued gems that were recorded from 1988 to 1993. And this compilation does the band a great service.

Taking a page from bands like the Smiths and the Cure, lead singer Colin Pennington has that snarl in his voice that James Dean Bradfield can still churn out, but there is a definite pop element to many of these songs. A palpable tension is felt but the band work just under its surface on the introductory "Freak Storm". One annoyance though is the group appears to shortshift the song, not giving it a proper sendoff. "Rachel Clean" gets to the point quickly through Alan Creevy's pounding of the skins. The Stone Roses would be another fair comparison, but whereas the Mancurians seemed to take that extra risk that either paid off or imploded Hellfire Sermons were content with being tight and very good, but not worthy of awe. "H.O.N.E.Y.M.O.O.N" comes off as a preamble for Morrissey's "You're the One for Me, Fatty" with a crunchier rhythm section.

In other parts of the album, you would swear Lou Reed has hijacked the vocals, especially on "Quicksand". The band winds its way around a melody rapidly before moving into another exciting and infectious pop blueprint. Fans of the early versions of the Beautiful South should get a kick out of "Penny Pinching Cathy", one of the golden nuggets among the 19. What the listener will find with roughly a quarter of these numbers is how they seem to be going nowhere fast, but like "Gentleman Caller", a slight alteration will have you cracking a smile and back alongside with them. The waltz-like pop rock of "The Best Laugh I Ever Had" is sinfully dreamy and gorgeous. "People say that I'm crazy", Pennington sings with Neal Carr offering some nifty and nimble guitar solos on the angst-sounding "Covered in Love".

As the album progresses, the band becomes a bit edgier and rough around the edges on tracks such as "Sacred Skin" despite the "la la la la la" sporadically added. This harder sound has its drawbacks though on the polished and too slick "Callaghan". The lyrics are better but the arrangement sees them trying too hard. "Sarasine" carries this further, sounding ominous and moving into territory that the Manics would revel in during The Holy Bible. The music is more pronounced here and there are some effects like background voices that seem at odds with what the band had been musically rooted in. As for "No Hands", please see Elastica.

Taken from three albums and nine different studio sessions, this collection does the group a great amount of deserved justice. But if the order of the selection could have been mixed up a tad more, the flow of the record would be even better than it is. A tune like "Bill & Sarah" or "Real Life Seams" works just as well closer to the start rather than one of four songs in a row taken from the same session. Regardless though, the album is a testament to the idea that the cream doesn't always rise to the public's top. Perhaps the talented and under-valued Hellfire Sermons were the original Rialto, falling incredibly through the cracks.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.