Jimi Hendrix: Martin Scorsese Presents the Blues: Jimi Hendrix

Brian James

Jimi Hendrix

Martin Scorsese Presents the Blues: Jimi Hendrix

Label: Universal
US Release Date: 2003-09-09
UK Release Date: 2003-09-15

Recently, Rolling Stone ran a feature on the one-hundred greatest guitarists of all time, and though it was worth flipping through to see who made the list and what positions they occupied, it held precisely zero suspense for the top spot. Of course, it was Jimi Hendrix and could have been no other, a fact even this lame, pander-to-the-younguns publication had to acknowledge. Nearly anyone who ever picks up a guitar even to fiddle around has had or is having dreams of being Hendrix, a man who blurred the boundaries between his instrument and his soul more visibly than any other rock musician. To watch him was to watch his Stratocaster disappear entirely into his body, becoming an appendage as natural as his arms. His vocabulary was limitless, his technique unmatched to this day. His was the axe that launched a thousand ships, each one nearly capsizing under the weight of Hendrix's endless progeny.

As Jesus could tell you, having such an ample following means that countless competing and even mutually exclusive interpretations of your teachings vie to be seen as the true continuation of the legacy. With Hendrix, most listeners came away mimicking his flashiest moments -- the lightning solos, the warped guitar effects, the deafening explosions of feedback. This, of course, is what made him such a hero to the white audience, but underneath it all was a greasy, down-home core that he had fortified in his rough years on the chitlin circuit, playing with such luminaries as the Isley Brothers and Little Richard. He may have expanded on that core to brilliant extents in his solo work, but he never forsook it. In a long-standing debate with his friendly rival, Eric Clapton, Hendrix insisted that the heart of the blues was rhythm, not the phrasing of the lead guitar. That he was right explains how he could venture a great distance from the old I-IV-V and still sound more blues than Clapton doing a sledgehammer take on "Spoonful" with Cream. He wasn't interested in being a purist (i.e., pretentious thief), so the blues camp has never made quite as strong an effort to claim him as one of their own as might be expected for a man of his stature.

It comes as some surprise, then, that Martin Scorsese has attempted to do just that by including him in his Martin Scorsese Presents the Blues series. The project's major flaw is its rockcentric view, one that, despite its obvious reverence for the blues, imagines it as something of a prelude rather than a self-contained art form. This is probably what lets Hendrix sneak in, but it winds up being good for everyone that he did. His compilation thankfully expands Hendrix's blues beyond just "Red House", an overrated and frankly boring song that still finds its way into countless bar-band set lists. A few other tracks from his three studio albums are included as well, but for the most part, the album is comprised of cuts either previously unreleased or contained only on his box set. Hendrix aficionados who already have the box will surely decry this as one more in a long line of rip-offs from the Experience Hendrix folks, but it's nevertheless a nice grab for would-be completists on a budget.

Yet it's much more than simply a collection of leftovers for miserly die hards. As revisionist history, it's a minor triumph, revealing a side of Hendrix unknown to all but a few. (An earlier compilation, the simply titled Blues, prevents this from being a bigger revelation.) For other rockers, a blues album could wind up demonstrating little more than their conservative side, but this turns out to be one of Hendrix's more adventurous posthumous affairs. A couple of duds clutter the proceedings, and epic jam "Voodoo Chile" distracts from the overall spirit, but once the album achieves momentum, it's striking.

The best tracks skip over the wanky soloing and mold the genre in Hendrix's image. Not many people know how to do this without sounding ignorant or disrespectful, but with grounding as firm as Hendrix had, he can make a song as far out as "It's Too Bad" or "Blue Window" sound authentic even when the listener has little idea what it's being authentic to. As with Scorsese's largely stellar box set, this album demonstrates a diversity of the blues that may be the best-kept secret in all of pop music. If you're in one of the countless bands dumb enough to think that all blues are supposed to sound like variations on "Red House", either shell out the sizeable chunk o' change it takes to acquire the Scorsese box set to learn from many masters or just pick up Hendrix's album to learn from one who can do the work of about a dozen.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.