Music

Honey Hush

Da Muzicianz

Popular songs like Da Muzicianz' 'Hush' suggests that it's not only okay, but romantic and positive to assume to know what a woman wants, and to act in her best interests, while she may not say otherwise.

I try not to pay too much attention to the Ying Yang Twins. But I've this self-titled album from Da Muzicianz (featuring Twin D-Roc and his real-life brothers) on my desk, and imagine, to my surprise, that there's actually a romantic track on there. The last time I noticed what either Twin was up to, he was beating up a woman's body part in a hit single, an act that briefly riled up the rockcrit/blog world. I've also got a single from the Twins next to me called "1st Booty on Duty" (you know, the first stripper out) so I'm not really expecting such romance from these guys, but there it is. Right?

Well, no. Da Muzicianz' "Hush" makes an effort, but it does so in a way that epitomizes a form of acquaintance rape, and in an especially insidious, subtle, way. The narrator says, perhaps honestly, that his lust is combined with true feeling and he's even afraid of being hurt: "Here are the keys, they go to my heart / I just hope you don't tease me and tear it apart." The openness sets the tone for a mature, equal sexual encounter, but then traditional male privilege takes over:

"You don't have to say a word

I want to get sexual with you

You don't have to say a word

Your body is talkin' to me."

The idea seems romantic, that the man knows what his partner wants and is taking the lead. However, it actually serves to limit her voice, remove her option for consent, and reduce her to a body. The second-person pronoun in that chorus either disempowers the woman or removes anything except the superficial. The man may not be trying to get away with anything, but he is choosing for the two of them. When one sexual partner is denied explicit consent or the conditions to sincerely give consent, then the resulting sex is rape.

People, male and female, don't understand this idea. Nothing short of explicit expression of a desire to proceed counts as consent, and even a "yes" can be revoked at any time. Guys: if a woman is naked on your bed, it still doesn't mean she's consented. If you're between her legs and moving forward, just about to penetrate, she still has every right to say no.

Here's the line that might get me strung up, so keep reading: not all rapists are evil people. This idea intensifies the already scary idea of acquaintance rape. Not all rapists even know they're rapists. Our culture has such confused ideas about consent that some guys don't even know what to look or ask for, or when they've got the green light (note: this problem doesn't absolve them of guilt or make it any less troubling, and it doesn't mean that some guys won't make sure they find what they're looking for, but more on that later). Popular media like "Hush" suggests that it's not only okay, but romantic and positive to assume to know what a woman wants, and to act in her, ahem, best interests for her. For this reason, it's important not only to reach individual people, but also to reform the culture.

Da Muzicianz (TVT) demonstrates the way date-rape culture works. While "Hush" alone removes female subjectivity, the tracks around it show how a broader worldview informs this idea of romanticism that's ultimately misogynist. "Camera Phone" appears next on the album, with its repeated insistence, "Shake something for the camera, ho!" The track demands that a woman objectify herself. With femininity positioned as purely physical, the conditions are unlikely to be met in which, still denied a vocal response, a woman in the bedroom can freely consent.

The preceding track, "The Girls I Know", describes "do-whatever-I-ask girls" and a woman praised solely for being ready to "cook me some dinner". The women Da Muzicianz know keep a number of guys on the side, take you for your money, and "aint got no rules". The sexual climate in this world is a free-for-all. Given that idea (and similar ones expressed throughout the album), the possibilities for sincere consent remain severely limited, and the need for verbal acknowledgement becomes even more important.

Instead, gestures of sexist chivalry become elevated as a form of true romanticism. You can tell I'm serious and I understand you because you don't even have to tell me what you feel. I'm so sure of this relationship that I'm removing your right to choose and I'm going to make sure I find a way to fuck you. It's very endearing, indeed. By blocking a woman's right to speak, a man ends her ability to consent, no matter his intentions. It doesn't matter if, as in this case, the man does so gently. Even the sound of "Hush" implies an inherent romance. The track comes out almost as a lullaby, with soft production and inviting synths. The track's mood suggests a beautiful night in satin sheets, which only serves to hide the undercover aggression penetrating the evening's activities.

None of this understanding of culture, of course, excuses an individual. Each person is responsible for his own actions, no matter what ideas media or other people have put into his head. If you commit rape, it's your fault. It's that simple. At the same time we need to change and resist the culture that promotes these attitudes. As much anger as I have in my heart over this issue, I'm more interested in preventing rape than in assigning blame.

Alan Berkowitz efficiently gets to some of the major ideas concerning consent in his article "Guidelines for Consent in Intimate Relationships". He describes four key ingredients: "1. Both parties are fully conscious; 2. Both participants are equally free to act; 3. Both parties have clearly communicated their willingness/permission; and 4. Both parties are positive and sincere in their desires." I strongly recommend reading his whole article, and I'll avoid summary here, but I want to stress one key point. Each of these points (including the continuum implied by the first) speaks not to what we typically speak of as force, but to a context in which the possibility for consent is disabled. While people have taken these concerns too far (including those who have misread Andrea Dworkin as saying that all heterosexual sex is rape), it is necessary to understand that power dynamics are not even. That unevenness, unspoken coercion, impaired decision-making skills, etc., can all contribute to an atmosphere in which honest consent is impossible. At that moment, sex must not happen.

Culture not only encourages misunderstandings of sexual relationships, it also contributes to this unbalanced context. Da Muzicianz' "Hush" is no more or less problematic than any number of popular songs -- including Akon's "Smack That", a recent chart-topper -- but it does exemplify the way in which rape culture builds on seemingly innocuous material. It's soft, it's romantic, it appeals to the heart, it's vulnerable. And it's rape.

* * *

Songs discussed can be heard on Da Muzicianz My Space

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image