I'll Fight for Your Life: An Interview with the Drums

Christopher Laird
Photo: CyCy Sanders

He seemed to lose a band member with each passing album, and then a big breakup made him rethink things. Jonny Pierce turned all of that into an album some are calling The Drums' best.

The Drums

Abysmal Thoughts

Label: Anti
Release Date: 2017-06-17

Jonny Pierce can't stop talking.

When PopMatters reaches him by phone, he's lying on his bed in Manhattan, and he's been doing press all morning. You would think he would be listless about this whole interview thing by now, but he's not. He's excited about the new turn his band, The Drums, have taken.

"I've just been hearing from different journalists over and over and over, 'This really feels like a debut ... and you're finally letting us in' and it's exactly what I wanted to do," Pierce tells us. An album titled Abysmal Thoughts doesn't instantly hit like a work of art that revives and brings life to its creator, but that's exactly what happened: "I feel like my feet are more on the ground than they ever have, and I really think it has a lot to do with writing this album." Pierce is feeling his new album and the relief it has brought him mentally, but the journey to get there wasn't as sweet.

The Drums hit the media hard and fast in 2009. The EP Summertime! got music writers all perked up with the band's fresh mix of beachy melodies and New Order tones. They were the most Shazamed band of 2009, Pitchfork called them "The Best Hope for 2010", and they had members of The Smiths showing up at their concerts. The Drums were huge, but Pierce wasn't enjoying it: "I think about the first album and all that buzz. I was on the cover of all these magazines and it was really a giant buzz around the world for the Drums and I was miserable."

The songs on the debut and the following two albums are great, but Pierce's writing style has changed dramatically since then: "I wasn't singing about anything really. It was whimsical, beachy, escapist songs. I mean there were some personal subtlety in there and there was some autobiographical stuff, but for the most part, it was really generalized."

This change was brought on by two precipitating factors, one a bummer, and the other just straight up depressing.

First off, The Drums have devolved into a solo act, after starting as a full-fledged four-piece with the self-titled debut: "With every album, I seem to have lost an official band member. We started as a four-piece with the debut album. By the time we released Portamento, we were down to three. Conner left just before we started Encyclopedia, and then Jacob, just after we finished recording Encyclopedia, told me that he was ready to do other things in his life ..."

Losing Jacob Graham was quite the blow for Pierce. They had been friends since they were small children, and they were the founding members of The Drums. This loss eventually brought Pierce to a revelation about himself though: "I knew that I could record this album on my own. Well, there's no one here anymore. It's just me, so I might as just well say it. I came out of the closet years ago, and I'm sort of coming out of a different closet now as a songwriter."

So, it's a good thing. Being on his own allowed him to write something more authentic to himself, something closer to his heart. "When you have other members in a band you feel some sort of pressure to also represent their feelings," he notes, "so I was sort of writing for a group instead of writing from my heart. So, that's a big difference on this album. And I think it makes the album all the more potent and relevant." So, losing members turned out to be a blessing, but the other inspiration for the album was quite a bit darker.

Pierce lost a love. Not just any love, but the first person he had really let in: "I hadn't ever felt the feeling of having a family or being close with someone and so it finally happened and I thought, 'Oh my god this is wonderful,' and it just didn't last." They tried moving to Los Angeles to put a Band-Aid on the problems, but the relationship problems just followed them there, and before long, Pierce was alone: "We ended up just breaking up, and I'm sitting in the middle of this big apartment in L.A. and I'm feeling crazier than I ever have. I think there were times when I almost went out of my mind. I don't mean that to sound funny or weird. I genuinely couldn't think straight." He was hitting a bottom he had not seen before.

After some time in this mental abyss, the dark times eventually illuminated his past for him: "OK Jonny, you're in your thirties now. Shit keeps hitting the fan, so maybe there's a reason that you're sitting in this giant apartment in L.A. by yourself feeling really dark. Maybe you really need some help. Maybe I'm the problem. Maybe I need to get some help."

He did get some help, but it turned out to be from within himself. He began to write more songs focused on his personal life, and it felt good: "I didn't have a lot of answers, but I had a lot of questions and I had a lot of frustrations and a lot of self-exploring to do, so every track ended up being more of a therapy session." His wounds are exposed on Abysmal Thoughts. Nothing is hidden from the listener. Some songs are quite direct. "Blood Under My Belt" is Pierce taking the blame for past mistakes and expressing his regret for losing someone. Later, "Head of The Horse" is a painful account of returning home and not being accepted for who you are.

At one point in our talk, when we were discussing Jonny's love of dance music, he said something elegant about his own tunes. He quipped: "I write pop songs ... they're short and they're sweet and they're gone." It almost sounds like a dig on himself at first, like that "gone" represents that his songs don't have a lasting impact. Well, they do have an impact -- at least the ones on the new record. He could tell you that himself: "Once you start talking about the inner workings of your heart, it gets addicting. I don't think I could write a song about surfing again. I don't see what the point would be for me." He has come back from an abysmal place, and he has himself and his songs to thank.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.