Isaac Hayes gets religiously sensitive

A press release from 60 Cycle media says that soul legend Hayes doesn't wanna be the voice of Chef on the South Park show anymore because he thinks the show is getting insensitive to religious beliefs. The creators would gleefully agree with him but you have to wonder if he hasn't been reading the scripts for all the years that he's worked with them.

His statement is:

"There is a place in this world for satire, but there is a time when satire ends and intolerance and bigotry towards religious beliefs of others begins." Mr. Hayes adds, "religious beliefs are sacred to people, and at all times should be respected and honored. As a civil rights activist of the past 40 years, I cannot support a show that disrespects those beliefs and practices."

No doubt that he's thinking of the recent uproar over the Danish cartoons of Mohammed when he says this but also that the South Park people are dying to fan some flames here over such controversies.

Before his quote above, the press release also has this information:

While fully acknowledging "South Park's" right to freedom of speech, Mr. Hayes is disappointed with what he perceives as a growing insensitivity towards personal spiritual beliefs, not only with South Parkғ episodes but also the recent Danish cartoon controversy.

The two schools of thought about how to deal with the Mohammed cartoon controversy go like this: 1) It's culturally insensitive and nowadays inflammatory to publish the cartoons, or 2) It's freedom of press and if we let religious extremists decide what can or can't go into print, then we become part of their theocracy. I definitely sympathize with the first view but have to say that I'm more in line with the 2nd one.

Let's suppose that the inflammatory cartoons were about Christ instead. Do you think that any religious groups in the State would demand boycotts or worse for the publications involved? Of course they would. Religious extremist is ugly in any form.

And so when another potentially inflammatory controversy may be set to erupt over cartoons lampooning religion, Hayes decides that he doesn't want to be part of it. It's his decision to make but it's not like South Park has never been disrespectful of religion before. Christ and Satan have been characters that appear in the 'toon and the show's creators are only too happy to make light of them. Hayes certainly knows this.

In light of the volatile situation over the Mohammed cartoons, he doesn't want to be involved in South Park anymore (which he doesn't say clearly in his statement) and that's somewhat more understandable. Hayes has every right to express and exercise his religious views but he should also explain why his religious views didn't stop him for working on South Park for so long.

Maybe Hayes' thinking is "People got mad over those religious cartoons so I don't want to be involved in another set of religious cartoons that are going to get people mad." The thing is, South Park's targets are usually Christian ones when it comes to religion. One reason that the show doesn't get threats and boycotts as much as you'd think is that they're equal opportunity offenders like Howard Stern, so they also piss on the left-wing plenty, hence the term "South Park Republicans." Of course, the shows' creators swear that they're not allied with either side but like Woodward's book on Bush, either side gleefully picks out the parts that prove their point and push/spin those tidbits their way.

Does Hayes know more than hes letting on? Surely heՕs privy to scripts and must see that the show is going into some more murky waters. But will they slap Christ as well as Mohammed in the future? If theyre going after Mohammed, maybe the expedient thing to do was to distance himself from the upcoming uproar (and thereՕll surely be one if this happens). if its a matter of him being sick of the Christ-bashing, then again, he should say why he put it with it for so long.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.