Jane's Addiction: Strays

Adam Williams

Jane's Addiction


Label: Capitol
US Release Date: 2003-07-22
UK Release Date: 2003-07-21

Over two decades ago, Jane's Addiction emerged from the convoluted punk/metal/glam Los Angeles scene as a ball of mutated sights and sounds. Led by the enigmatic Perry Farrell, the band forged ahead with its unique blend of musical influences, laying the groundwork for the genre that would become known as alternative. An all too brief career concluded as the band broke up in a haze of drugs and acrimony, leaving only a handful of recordings (albeit with an impressive reputation) as its legacy. The importance of Jane's Addiction to the germination of '90s music is a given, and it is surprisingly ironic that the group was not around long enough to enjoy it as it happened. After the group fell apart, Farrell went on to form Porno for Pyros with drummer Stephen Perkins, and to brainstorm the successful Lollapalooza tour concept; bassist Eric Avery pursued other interests, while guitarist Dave Navarro honed his craft as a replacement member of the Red Hot Chili Peppers (The incestuous relationship between Jane's and the Peppers continued as Chili bass ace Flea joined Navarro, Farrell, and Perkins for a short stint in 1997).

After such an extended period apart, it would have seemed unlikely that Jane's Addiction would ever reconvene to record a new album, let alone produce such a fine effort as Strays. But that is exactly what the band has done.

Older, wiser, more tolerant, and generally cleaned up, Farrell, Navarro, and Perkins have joined forces with bassist Chris Chaney in the new millennium's version of their revered group (Avery chose not to re-enlist due in large part to ongoing hard feelings with Farrell). While loyal fans are ecstatic about the new recording, it is a far cry from the Jane's Addiction we knew and loved so many years ago.

Perhaps a sign of the group's growth as artists, perhaps merely a hint of the changing times, Strays is an expertly crafted rock album, noticeably lacking much of Jane's earlier alternative sensibilities. Gone is Farrell's shrill tormented wail, replaced instead by rich impassioned vocals; Navarro's original scattershot playing has matured into ornately heavy riffing reminiscent of Slash's best work; Perkins' drumming is complemented by Chaney's studio expertise, making for a precise rhythmic foundation. Add to the mix Bob Ezrin's stellar production talents, and the end result is Strays.

Farrell's writing and vision had always been the guiding force behind the band's recorded successes, particularly the acclaimed album Ritual de lo Habitual. There are glimpses of the traditional Jane's sound in the new songs "Price I Pay" and "Everybody's Friend", as Farrell's sensitivity is underscored by familiar melancholy, making this pair of tracks as close to vintage Jane's as any on Strays. While the album's lyrical content is consistently strong, the remaining nine tracks are given true life through Navarro's electrifying fret work. "True Nature" and "Just Because" may be more visible due to radio/video airplay, but "Superhero" and "Wrong Girl" serve as the guitarist's coming of age outlet, as he dazzles listeners with his superb playing, and stamps the album with his distinctly heavy brand.

Even Perkins is given an opportunity to enjoy the spotlight, as his ferocious drumming leads the way in "Hypersonic", three-and-a-half minutes of warp speed listening enjoyment. It is easily the most dynamic track of the 11 offerings.

A decade ago, comparisons between Jane's Addiction and heavy rock acts would have been viewed as alternative music heresy. That said, the band's new incarnation, with its decidedly riff-oriented sound, more closely resembles the early dexterity of Led Zeppelin than anything from the original Jane's era.

Released to critical acclaim, the ultimate importance of Strays is yet to be seen. At the very least, the album has already served as the long anticipated reunion between band and fans. Additionally, it shows that the time off has allowed Jane's Addiction to grow and evolve as a musical entity. In spite of Avery's absence, Farrell and company seem to have made peace with the past and are enjoying the present in an effort to embrace the future.

Let's hope we don't have to wait as long for another Jane's album of this quality.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.