Jonatha Brooke: The Works

Brooke's collection of unreleased Woody Guthrie lyrics set to her own original music isn't Mermaid Avenue III. But it never had to be.

Jonatha Brooke

The Works

Label: Bad Dog
US Release Date: 2008-08-26
UK Release Date: Available as import

Much of the press surrounding Jonatha Brooke’s The Works trumpets the fact that the veteran folkie is the first woman to peruse the vaults of unreleased Woody Guthrie lyrics and build songs around them. But that milestone, like a vice presidential candidacy, isn’t worth squat if the musician or politician in question isn’t qualified, viable, or in good faith. Happily, Brooke is all of those things, and has been for quite some time. Whether as part of the long-defunct and much missed duo The Story or on her solid solo repertoire, Brooke has injected her smart, soulful folk songs with tinges of jazz and R&B, poetry-inspired lyrics, and piercing, inflection-filled vocals. It’s not like she just popped out of the musical ether armed only with the novelty that her name isn’t Billy or Jeff; what matters more is that she’s got the credentials to take on Guthrie and make him her own.

And speaking of Bragg and Tweedy, it’s easy but a mistake to approach The Works with the Mermaid Avenue volumes in mind. Brooke’s album is not Volume III. As with the rest of her catalog, The Works falls on the more polished end of the folk and Americana spectrum. There’s no banjo-fueled “Christ for President” or spooked out and resonated “Black Wind Blowing”. Instead, there’s “All You Gotta Do Is Touch Me”, a warm and sensual duet with Keb' Mo', and the sugary, nostalgic “Sweetest Angel”. But that Brooke is drawn to more sentimental material isn’t a surprise or a detriment. The Works largely highlights the sweet and directly romantic side of Guthrie and fits them into structures more suitable to the coffeehouse than the Mountain Stage.

The sun-dappled piano of “My Flowers Grow Green” pairs with standup bass, church organ, and sparse drums to provide a simple backdrop for Brooke’s voice to soar. It’s not just a pretty song or performance, it’s smart writing. Placing Guthrie’s litany of flowers, “My pinks and my phlox and my four o’clocks”, in a gospel setting is trickier than a standard I-IV-V hoedown. Deft use of minor chords, particularly on lines like “You’ll never kiss another / Prettier than me”, add extra layers of pathos and emotion that would be lost in a more basic folk pattern. “You’d Ought To Be Satisfied Now” appropriately swaggers as a brisk and intricate blues, and “King of My Love” squeezes especially wordy passages into an refreshing and original arrangement of Cajun accordion and piano that speeds and slows.

Each song on The Works takes a different stylistic approach, from the anthemic “There’s More True Lovers Than One” to the smoky, noir-jazz of the opening “My Sweet and Bitter Bowl”, but the production unites them all with sharply recorded performances and a focus on Brooke’s articulate voice. The cohesive sound also helps the two wholly Brooke compositions not stick out like sore, anachronistic thumbs. “Little Bird” is gentle, organ-driven soul, while “Taste of Danger” swims into slightly rockier territory.

It’s perhaps inevitable that until more and more artists become involved in bringing unheard Guthrie lyrics to light, albums like The Works will be compared to the first adventures. But the same expectations should not be applied. Brooke’s song selection and inventive and playful imagination have taken Guthrie's words and given them, if not radical, then at least somewhat unexpected places to live on, places that speak as much to her gifts as his. “My Battle” fuses gospel organ and pacing with the country associations of pedal steel guitar, embodying the populism of “This Land Is Your Land” with those two instruments, and closing with the refrain, “Teach me how to fight, how to win, how to love.” Glory be that through his archives and help from folks like Jonatha Brooke and more to come, he continues to teach us.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.