Music

Jucifer: I Name You Destroyer

Patrick Schabe

Jucifer

I Name You Destroyer

Label: Velocette
US Release Date: 2002-06-19
Amazon
iTunes

One of the benefits of being a bona fide indie rock band is that you can cut and paste from other, more firmly established and thus more rigid, genres and not bat an eye. Oh, maybe that whole rap-metal hybrid sounded fresh and innovative once upon a long time ago, but it's become its own industry, with each act being basically indistinguishable from one another. And indie rock grants the musician with a mission a depth of history to draw from that sprawls all over the musical map.

For Jucifer, who are undoubtedly an indie rock band (hey, they're from Athens, Georgia!), that pastiche is a sound that draws from some of indie's past glories, particularly Sonic Youth, the Breeders, Nirvana, and some hints of the Pixies, as well as reaching further outside the confines of the "alternative" to draw in some hard-hitting metal inspiration. Not that metal hasn't added to the textures of a considerable amount of indie rock in the past, but here we're talking about re-tooled hardcore.

What hits most people right away is that Jucifer is a duo, comprised of vocalist/guitarist Amber Valentine and drummer Ed Livengood. What makes this special is that you'd never be able to accuse Jucifer of minimalism. For a simple duo, Valentine and Livengood manage to fill up every inch of space in their wall of sound. According to all reports, with little more than the furry of an amped up and distorted guitar and a fierce attack on drums, Jucifer's live shows rock as hard and as fully as any larger combo. But, where the ablum is concerned, that's more or less beside the point. It's what's on disc that counts.

Frankly, I'd be surprised, albeit pleasantly, if Jucifer's live performances could live up to the slick and frenzied layers of the album. Only their third release (following 1999's Calling All Cars on the Vegas Strip LP and 2001's The Lambs EP), the couple shows a real talent for maintaining creative control and still producing worthwhile material. Stacked up under the guitar and drum blitz are the occasional uses of keyboards, strings, horns, feedback, and even some scratching. But the added freedoms of the studio are not meant to diminish the core of Jucifer's guitar-rock sound. As the liner notes make plain, this album was "recorded without Pro Tools, loops, samples, studio musicians, big shots or lackeys". An organic recording process, performed solely by Valentine and Livengood, this disc is neither rough nor overproduced. And yet, without the variety of the additional instrumentation, it's hard to imagine these songs working so well. Without the ocean-like, morose strings of "Surface Tension", the song would be flat. The trip-hop intonations of "Lazing" would be impossible with a simple guitar and drum.

So, don't be fooled. This is a studio record, no doubt about it. But where I Name You Destroyer is concerned, this is a good thing, because it reflects the overlying themes of the album, maybe even more than is intentional. Despite its noisy and gritty furor, there's a glassy, shallow feeling to this disc. It's like the sonic equivalent of a Bret Easton Ellis novel. The characters of these songs are flat, two-dimensional beings who exist in a faux-glamour. Becky, of "Amplifier", is a cocaine casualty, overdosing in superstar fashion. The femme fatale of "Sea Blind" "believes in diet pills and fashion", and lives in a world of drugs and materialism. Even the sultry, almost sleazy, sexiness of "When She Goes Out", "Fight Song" and "Firefly" is mired in a destructive danger.

It would be hard to pull this off without Valentine's voice. The press kit's invocation of "Portishead meets Black Sabbath" as a description for Jucifer is somewhat accurate on this account. Valentine's vocals, on the majority of these songs, might remind one a bit of Beth Gibbons, but only as a slight comparison. The fact is, they're slippery and ethereal, but not exactly jazzy and not airy either. It's more as if her voice approximates the druggy nature of the valium- and cocaine-addicted denizens of the songs. Dazed and bedazzled, the languid vocals give these songs their chrome and plastic sheen. It's only on the tracks where Valentine trades in the high for scratchy metal barking ("Queen B" in particular) that the mood becomes something more aggressive and angry. Consequently, these songs seem to be the least effective, despite adding to the variety of Jucifer's sonic attack.

This is indie rock for true rockers who love their giant riffs and power chords. It's also a pretty fair reflection of the disaffected, shallow-but-glossy world of contemporary values. Whether or not it's a celebration or a criticism is left ambiguous, as is the question of whether it's art or artifice. Valentine and Livengood are playing in the fields of tradition, producing modern rock for postmodern times, but with all that it leaves open, there's little doubt that it works. If there's anything we're supposed to take away from this "expression of love", it can probably best be found in "Amplifier": "Let's all switch on an amplifier / And rock out to the beat". Fair enough.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image