The Klezmatics: Brother Moses Smote the Water

Matt Cibula

This review will be relatively short, as I have run out of synonyms for "amazing".

The Klezmatics

Brother Moses Smote the Water

Label: Piranha Musik
US Release Date: 2005-03-08
UK Release Date: 2005-01-24
Amazon affiliate

This review will be relatively short, as I have run out of synonyms for "amazing".

I am already on record as saying that the Klezmatics are the best band in America, and this album just cements that opinion in my mind. If they even register on anyone's radar screen, it's usually along the lines of "Oh, that klezmer group, they played at Charlotte's wedding on Sex and the City, sure, but it's a novelty group, isn't it?" Uh, NO. As wonderful albums like Rhythm and Jews have demonstrated, no other group in the land has the kind of reach, breadth, depth, and pinpoint precision that they bring to the table. They're not often the flashiest, nor perhaps the most exciting -- but they are the best, and this is not negotiable.

The German world-music label Piranha is not the K's usual label; this is a recording of a 2004 show in Berlin. I'm actually shocked that they have never made a live album before, and that it took a special occasion concert like this one to make that happen. The "special occasion" part is that this show features "freedom songs" from the Jewish and Christian musical traditions -- but the really important thing about the show is that it featured two hugely important special guests. These guests are so talented and amazing that they need their own explanatory paragraph.

Joshua Nelson is a Jewish African-American singer who has been featured in the documentary Keep on Walking. His voice is indescribable without the adjective "huge"; he manages to channel classic soul and blues singers as well as his idol, Mahalia Jackson. The other guest, who appears on just one track, is jazz singer/pianist Kathryn Farmer, whose birth mother was Jewish but who was adopted into an African-American family as a child. This kind of cultural cross-connection is the soul of this project, but Nelson is the big revelation here. He has a gospel voice but full command of the Jewish music repertoire. There might not be a more exciting singer in the world.

Which is not to say that Farmer, or Klezmatics lead singer Lorin Sklamberg, are slouches. The latter's soaring tenor is still as ethereal as it's ever been, a weapon to be employed against all manner of stupidity and demonry, and the latter's rendition of "Go Down Moses" makes me want to seek out everything she's ever done and purchase it and memorize it. But the way Joshua Nelson wades into the middle of "Elijah Rock" and blows it apart, fat tones full of soul and sorrow and exultation, and the massive vamping on "Walk in Jerusalem" and "Didn't It Rain"... I'm telling you, it's not really anything that can be explained. If you don't find a way to experience this, then you will be a poorer person.

And the Klezmatics simply cannot be faulted as a band. Paul Morrissett and David Licht are an undeniable rhythm section; Frank London pulls off some stunning trumpet work, just like he always does (remember the trumpet solo in L.L.'s "Goin' Back to Cali"? that's the guy); one Matt Darriau clarinet run almost pulls a whole "walls of Jericho"; and violinist Lisa Gutkin seems a little more integrated into the rest of the band now, although she really hasn't banished the spectre of Alicia Svigals. And not enough nice things could be said about Lorin Sklamberg, one of the purest singers I've ever heard. He soars on "Ki Loy Nue," he owns "Ale Brider", and he pleads and testifies on the slow-burner "Shnirele, Perele", setting the table perfectly for Nelson's big fat entrance. Then the two of them, as the band goes into ambient free-fall, start trading lines in Hebrew, and burn the damn house down.

There are no longer any boundaries of any kind. The world is changed, somehow. If you have any soul at all, you will weep.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.