Amel Larrieux

Steven J. Horowitz

After reaching the heights of mainstream success, neo-soul vocalist Amel Larrieux had to start over when it came to crafting her own vision. Three albums into a sometimes turbulent solo career, she's finally found her independence, and is preparing a musical explosion of creative output.

Breathing Room

Circa 1995, the Billboard Hot 100 singles boasted a top-four of pop royalty, all of whom would later face career blockades of wardrobe malfunctions, TRL breakdowns, and alleged crack addictions: Janet and Michael Jackson, Mariah Carey, and Whitney Houston. In the fifth slot, behind the seats of these temporarily dormant pop volcanoes, sat a song called "Tell Me" by Groove Theory, a fresh R&B duo that consisted of smooth chanteuse Amel Larrieux and producer Bryce Wilson. Unfortunately, with the burning newfound success of "Tell Me", Groove Theory began to suffer from the traditionally overwhelming quandary that comes with stardom. Each member of the duo wanted to take the group in different musical directions, and they split, despite managing to send a lasting tremble through the R&B world.

Amel Larrieux
multiple songs and videos: MP3s and video
multiple songs: MySpace

[Amazon] [iTunes]

"A couple months ago, I went to a movie premiere, and I ran into from the Black Eyed Peas, and we talked for a while, and he said 'I just want you to know that the Groove Theory album changed the way I looked at music completely, and it really influenced the way I did things.' I have absolutely no sense of these things if somebody doesn't just stand there and tell me something like that," says Larrieux.

With the recent release of her third solo album, Morning, Larrieux has taken her six years in solo-land to both sharpen her sound and independently command her artistic vision. Morning, a departure from 2000's silk-warbled Infinite Possibilities and 2004's dusky Bravebird, features Larrieux resting on a stripped backbone of sparseness that refrains from the musical aerobics that tend to cloud top-40 R&B hits. "The thing that we were really playing with on purpose was allowing ourselves to do stuff that's more stripped down. It's really nice to let the song breathe, and the lyrics breathe, and the voice breathe, and [to know] that sometimes it's really fine with just two instruments," she says.

The bareness of Morning shines through differently on each of the album's tracks. "Earn My Affections", on which Larrieux squarely scats against the simplicity of a drum-snare combo, builds musical tension (and remains charged with relativistic beauty) without the glossification of a mastering board or the banal trills of a glib keyboard. "Trouble", the album's opener, is built on a different brand of bareness, featuring the major 7th wicka-wah's of an electric guitar coalescing with the repetitious taps of a light shaker and wooden pipe.

Larrieux's departure from a more flourishing sound coincides with her willingness to tamper with vocal harmonies and experiment with chord progressions that many R&B singers are too musically insipid to attempt. On "Just Once", Larrieux takes advantage of the keyboard's basic one-note melody to harmonically experiment, blurring the line that separates a major from a minor key and crafting a track that shifts between pop, jazz, and R&B. The album flows in the same vein, resulting in a hodgepodge of musicality. "I'm so the wrong person to ask about a certain category of music, because they all kind of blur to me, and because I'm always listening to all kinds of stuff, I'm just kind of always thinking I'm just being blind," she states.

On the album's first single, "Weary", a piano track festooned with traditional rim shots, Larrieux shines in her vocal wails that emphasize the song's intent to represent the struggle that women have in finding emotional solace. "Part of the reason it ended up as kind of an ode to women is that there is still a lot of inequality, and we are still judged in a way that men aren't," she says. "I think that's probably why it rings true for so many women."

As on "Weary", Larrieux's subject matter on Morning draws from personal experiences, ranging from "procrastination" to "self-doubt" to "self-esteem issues." The title track draws from Larrieux's childhood bout with insomnia and the loneliness that comes with it. "I've been given meditation tapes, where you have to visualize yourself as an empty shell being filled with iron liquid, all this stuff, pictures of the ocean, and given valerian drops so I could go to sleep. I remember that feeling of being the only one awake and how lonely that was, and how I'd wish for the morning to come."

Although Larrieux is now able to deliver music without having to conform to a certain sound or subject, she achieved this musical freedom only after contending with Epic Records to release her from her contract. After the dissipation of Groove Theory, Larrieux's contract carried over on Epic, who eventually allotted her a hefty advance to record her debut album. But with the success of "Tell Me" in mind, record executives initially wanted her to recreate the formula on which the single was based. "When I left Groove Theory, they picked up my option and I was hoping that they would let me go, but they didn't. I had to try to get them to go ahead and give me money to record my own album and they wouldn't for a while, and I had to go ahead and do my stuff."

The result was Infinite Possibilities, a record that successfully melded nu-jazz and neo-soul R&B. The album spawned the successful hits "Get Up" and "Sweet Misery", and ended with the gorgeous piano-and-voice ballad "Make Me Whole", a tribute to her husband and producer Laru Larrieux. Fans enjoyed the song so much that some even made it their wedding song. "I think I'm such a romantic, and idealist. I want so much to say things in a way that no one else has said it, or at least attempt to. Maybe that's why that song works for people, because it's a refreshing way and a really intimate and personal way of saying 'Thank you for changing my life.'"

Despite the following that Larrieux acquired, she still remained dissatisfied with the promotional efforts on Epic's behalf. As the label went through several managerial regime changes, Larrieux seized any opportunity to wriggle out of her contract.

"We had been begging and calling the Vice President and the President, saying 'Please, let me off.' Finally, somehow, there was a way, because they were like 'Either do it our way, and get us to back you, or do it your way and we won't.' I think they realized that I was really serious that there wasn't going to be a way to sway me, and everything was falling apart there again. Everyone was leaving, there was nobody really working things, and so I was able to get out."

Larrieux was soon picked up by independent label Blisslife, who released both Bravebird and Morning. With the newfound freedom of having a label that backed her musical choices, Larrieux began to cultivate her own style without facing pressures to capture a mainstream sound. She began to musically experiment in the studio with her husband and created Bravebird, a record that was remarkably darker and edgier than her debut. "I do believe it was grittier, and I do believe it was more confident, and those things come from the seasoning that being on the road gives you, live," she says. "I think that we had always wanted to capture the feeling that people said they got from my live shows in the studio without necessarily having to do a lot of live recording, because that's a sound unto itself."

With the release of Morning, Larrieux plans on touring as she has done with previous albums. In addition to a tour in the works, Larrieux has already started work on three albums, each of which she hopes to release over the next three years. "Ideally, I'd like to put an album out every year and then, during this year, our plan is to do two more albums: a lullaby album with my oldest daughter, and then an album of covers. Then, maybe a live album," she says. "But hopefully, I'll keep myself busy enough where I don't ponder on that stuff too much."

[artist website]

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.